Failed - Judgment Search Results

Follette Vs. Comacho

Court: US Supreme Court

follette v comacho 398 u s 279 1970 u s supreme court follette v comacho 398 u s 279 1970...

Adickes Vs. S. H. Kress and Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... petitioner given these unexplained gaps in the materials submitted by respondent we conclude that respondent failed to fulfill its initial burden of demonstrating what is a critical element in this aspect ..... by providing a remedy against individuals who share responsibility for conspiratorial wrongs under 1985 by failing to make reasonable use of their power to prevent the perpetration of such wrongs .....

Evans Vs. Abney

Court: US Supreme Court

..... particular purpose of the baconsfield trust as stated in the will failed under georgia law the question then properly before the georgia ..... effect that senator bacon would have rather had the whole trust fail than have baconsfield integrated when a city park is destroyed ..... of the georgia courts holding that the baconsfield trust had failed must rest logically on the unspoken premise that the presence .....

Toussie Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... regulations prescribed thereunder petitioner was indicted in may 1967 for failing to register and was convicted the district court held ..... bars petitioner s prosecution shortly before his 26th birthday for failing ever to have registered for the draft that conclusion ..... his duty to register continues he cannot be punished for failing to comply since late registration would necessarily be incriminating .....

United States Vs. Icc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the applicants had accepted all protective conditions sought by milwaukee and acknowledged that it had failed to give appropriate weight to 5 of the interstate commerce act to facilitate rail ..... weight to the diminution of competition between the northern lines in short that it failed to strike the correct balance between antitrust objectives and the overall transportation needs that concern .....

Gutknecht Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to the united states attorney for further education and persuasion or if such also failed for prosecution selective service system organization and administration of the system 241 special monograph ..... president might promulgate new regulations restricted in application to cases in which a registrant fails to comply with a duty essential to the classification process itself that provide for .....

H.H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao ScIndia Bahadur of Gwalior ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC530; (1971)1SCC85; [1971]3SCR9

..... in respect of their sequestrated property the commission made a determination that the plaintiff company failed to establish a claim the plaintiff company then brought an action for a declaration that ..... jurisdiction of the appointed tribunal viz whether the tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction or has failed to exercise its jurisdiction 402 in the present case the question for consideration is the .....

American Farm Lines Vs. Black Ball Freight

Court: US Supreme Court

..... seeks to provide or the identity of any existing carriers who failed or refused to provide the needed service and the reasons ..... carriers providing multiple line service are not capable of or have failed in meeting the reasonable immediate page 397 u s 548 and ..... assessment of them is not specified in sum the dod statement fails to supply that concrete evidence of the inability of particular existing .....

United States Vs. Sisson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the district of massachusetts syllabus appellee was indicted for willfully failing to report for induction as ordered by his local draft ..... count indictment charged that sisson did unlawfully knowingly and willfully fail and neglect and refuse to perform a duty imposed by ..... that the selective service registrant did unlawfully knowingly and willfully fail and neglect and refuse to perform a duty required .....

New Haven Inclusion Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

..... three valuation changes netting a 6 600 000 reduction in estimated worth the commission had failed to adjust the old inapplicable discount figure accordingly the court directed the commission to file ..... 121 400 in equipment investments and materials during the first year of the liquidation but failed to spread the assumed receipts over the entirety of that year with a consequent understatement .....