Facing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: facing Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 947 results (0.03 seconds)S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
..... inefficiency and incompetency get easily ruled out but the real problem that requires to be faced is what should happen when aspects like suspected misbehaviour and or reported lack of integrity ..... bureaucracy as this attitude which cannot be substantially justified beyond these specifically qualified areas in facing a parliament the bureaucracy out of a sure power instinct fights every attempt of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKartikey V. Sarabhai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-06-1981
Reported in: (1982)28CTR(Guj)132; [1982]138ITR425(Guj)
..... right of the shareholders to the extent of the reduction of the face value of the share and the consequential question if so whether any ..... in the shareholding in respect of reference shares which were of the face value of rs 1 000 originally was extinguished to the extent ..... in the shares the number of shares remained the same but the face value of the shares was reduced and there was a proportionate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1981
..... amendment grounds a lawyer s suspension from practice for face to face solicitation of business for pecuniary gain in the course ..... on which the indictments are founded are void on their face until an acceptable limiting construction is obtained the provisions cannot ..... prediction cannot with confidence justify invalidating a statute on its face and so prohibiting a state from enforcing the statute .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHeffron Vs. Soc'y for Krishna Consciousness
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-1981
..... from walking about the fairgrounds and communicating the organization s views to fair patrons in face to face discussions space in the fairgrounds is rented in a nondiscriminatory fashion on a first ..... f 2d 430 444 n 22 ca2 1981 if fairgoers can make speeches engage in face to face proselytizing and buttonhole prospective supporters they can surely distribute literature to members of their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnderson Bros. Ford Vs. Valencia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1981
..... entirely incidental to the principal consumer credit transaction to disclose this security interest on the face of the contract which is the point here is merely to add virtually inconsequential ..... the court believes that requiring disclosure of an assignment of unearned insurance premiums on the face of the credit contract would be a gratuitous informational overload of no significant benefit .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH. L. Vs. Matheson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1981
..... standing to challenge the utah statute as being unconstitutional on its face on the ground of overbreadth in that it could be construed ..... of justice marshall which would hold the utah statute invalid on its face elevates the decision of the minor and her physician to an ..... not alter the hardship created by the notice requirement on its face footnote 4 27 and that hardship is not a mere disincentive .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMichael M. Vs. Superior Ct.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1981
..... drinking moved away from the others and began to kiss after being struck in the face for rebuffing petitioner s initial advances sharon submitted to sexual intercourse with petitioner prior to ..... disproportionately the deleterious consequences of illegitimate pregnancy justice stewart concurring section 261 5 on its face classifies on the basis of sex a male who engages in sexual intercourse with an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Protima Roy Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-20-1981
Reported in: (1982)27CTR(Cal)275,[1982]138ITR536(Cal)
..... right may be measured by setting off against the appreciation in the face value of the new shares the depreciation in the old shares and ..... the price might have to be adjusted either in proportion to the face value they bore if there was no other circumstance to differentiate them ..... their sale price and the valuation of the bonus shares whether at face value or at market value or at nil or even at a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBullington Vs. Missouri
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-04-1981
..... missouri capital murder trial surely are at least equivalent to that faced by any defendant at the guilt phase of a criminal ..... nonetheless one that a guilty defendant may not be required to face twice petitioner s ordeal upon retrial would not be different in ..... that of the defendants in chaffin and stroud both of whom faced the possibility of the death sentence upon reconviction chaffin v stynchcombe .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLassiter Vs. Department of Social Svcs.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1981
..... powell agreed with the plurality that independent representation must be provided to an inmate facing involuntary transfer to a state mental hospital but concluded that this representative need not ..... determined that due process requires an individualized approach to requests for counsel by probationers facing revocation the rule established there was based on respect for the rehabilitative focus of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial