Extracting - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: extracting Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 305 results (0.033 seconds)Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd Vs. Bhagyanagar Solvent ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2013
..... indian renewable energy development agency ltd petitioner through mr dharmender arya adv versus bhagyanagar solvent extractions pvt ltd ors through none respondents coram hon ble mr justice j r midha judgment ..... confer any jurisdiction on the court within whose jurisdiction the notice was issued the relevant extract of the said judgment is as under 10 mr ahmadi learned senior counsel for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Regional Director, Esi Corpn. Vs. M/S. Arjuna Natural Extracts (P) ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-07-2013
..... 2 thrissur 20 by adv sri p sankarankutty nair respondent applicant m s arjuna natural extracts p ltd bank road aluva represented by its managing director mr p j kunjachan by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S.Kerala Solvent Extractions Ltd. Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-26-2013
..... sravana 1935 wp c no 12602 of 2013 a petitioner s m s kerala solvent extractions ltd registered office at irinjalakkuda and branch at vedhagiri kurumulloor p o kottayam represented by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Director Vs. M/S.Ananth Oil Extractions
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
..... kaloor kochi 17 by adv sri thomas mathew nellimoottil respondent applicant m s ananth oil extractions ananth towers vijaraghava menon road ravipuram ernakulam kochi 682 016 this insurance appeal having been .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEsi Corpn. Vs. Kerala Solvent Extractions Ltd.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
..... 680 020 by adv smt t d rajalakshmy sc esi corporation respondent applicant kerala solvent extractions ltd p o irinjalakuda rep by its chairman shri p c paul pin 680 121 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jandk; and ors
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
..... reliefs i mandamus commanding the respondents to provide accord permissions to the petitioner to extract the minor forests produce from the forests predominantly for the reasons that i the ..... five years for which ban had been imposed petitioner has not been granted permission for extraction collection of mfp despite making representation to the government 4 respondents have filed objections .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2013
..... article 239aa and reference made to article 254 of the constitution for convenience the relevant extract of these provisions are reproduced hereunder 239aa special provisions with respect to delhi 1 as ..... was drawn up 599 amongst the several barriers identified the two which deserve to be extracted for the purposes of highlighting the gender implications of limited access on account of restricted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.Daisy Rani Vs. Chairman of Teachers Recruitment Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
..... learned single judge in paragraphs 11 to 13 that were extracted above 120 therefore the petitioners who have participated in the ..... permitting the state government to make appointment which has been extracted above taking into account the fact that the appointments to ..... employment exchange officer and others reported in 2008 5 mlj1252is extracted in this regard quot 13 subsequently in the case of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2013
..... article 239aa and reference made to article 254 of the constitution for convenience the relevant extract of these provisions are reproduced hereunder 239aa special provisions with respect to delhi 1 as ..... was drawn up 599 amongst the several barriers identified the two which deserve to be extracted for the purposes of highlighting the gender implications of limited access on account of restricted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.Jayanthi Vs. Election Commission of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-05-2013
..... nomination and passed orders without mentioning any proceedings number document no 6 13 the above extracted portion thus amply makes it clear that the election petitioner has not presented her nomination ..... order of rejection made by the returning officer the translated version of the same is extracted hereunder quot the decision taken by returning officer for acceptance or rejection of nomination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial