Extorter - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: extorter Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 52 results (0.003 seconds)Speedway Rubber Co. Vs. Commissioner, Central Excise, Chandigarh and o ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-07-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC2108; 2002(143)ELT8(SC); JT2002(Suppl1)SC41; 2002(4)SCALE475; (2002)5SCC527; [2002]3SCR826
rajendra babu j 1 this is a statutory appeal by the appellants under section 35l a and b of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTanwar Marketing Services Vs. Zenith Rubber Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2002
Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)900; AIR2002Delhi430
v s aggarwal j 1 three separate suits have been filed bearing nos 886 98 863 98 and 864 98...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlpine Industry Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2002
Reported in: (2006)(203)ELT563TriDel
1 appellant filed this appeal against the adjudication order passed by the commissioner of central excise whereby the central excise...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2002
Reported in: (2003)(87)ECC108
1 the above captioned appeals have been directed against the common order in appeal dated 28 9 2001 of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnthony @ Tony William Rosario Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-05-2002
Reported in: 2003(4)MhLj892
..... duly authenticated by the private secretary of this court indian penal code 1860 section 387 extortion identification of accused identification parade held in borivali police station building on 1st floor office .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurendra Alias Altaf Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-29-2002
Reported in: 2002BomCR(Cri)628; 2002CriLJ4137
..... dangerous persons act 1981 section 3 detention order six persons involved in the case of extortion no detention orders passed against two orders of detention of two were revoked by state .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOllala Kamlakar Lachaiah and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-19-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)40; 2003BomCR(Cri)678; 2003(1)MhLj849
..... required to part with money in order to protect himself and submits to extortion by the naxalites same cannot be construed as abetting the activities of ..... writ petition no 247 02 and the amount to be paid is not extortion money according to him there is sufficient material on record to show ..... no 2 in w p no 247 02 and it is not extortion money in the light of the above evidence we do not consider .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.S. Khandwala (i.P.S.) Addl. D.G.P. and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-29-2002
Reported in: (2003)1GLR802
..... the offences alleged against the petitioners are under sections 331 voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort confession or information 336 doing any act which endangers human life or the personal ..... and sudden provocation 346 wrongful confinement in secret 348 wrongful confinement for the purpose of extorting confession or information 352 assault or use of criminal force otherwise than on grave .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Viswanathan Vs. Dr. A.K. Burman and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-08-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ949
..... him and the member of his family with a view to extort money and with that evil design a first information report was ..... university the said criminal case was initiated with a view to extort money illegal steps had allegedly been taken to show that he ..... a member of some extremist organization like ulfa but having failed to extort money from the petitioner the above fir was lodged the summation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuptajee Tent and Decorators Vs. Ito
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)74TTJ(Del)927
..... great undue pressure and with such unwarranted pressure disclosure of rs 1 50 000 was extorted from the instant assessed there is no ground nor relevance for such a disclosure to ..... kindly not be presented for encashment because it is found that the disclosure is incorrectly extorted by undue pressure and the assessed has nothing on the basis of which it can .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial