Extensively - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: extensively Year: 1920 Page 1 of about 110 results (0.018 seconds)Eastern Extension Tel. Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-12-1920
..... the treaty with spain was signed december 10 1898 that the government used the cables extensively for official dispatches which were given priority in transmission but that this was in accordance ..... in the form following the united states government at manila in account with the eastern extension australasia china tel co limited free transmission of american government telegrams over hong kong manila .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Bhagvan Krishna Thorat
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-14-1920
Reported in: AIR1921Bom249; (1920)22BOMLR892
..... animals liability to be tried under section 62 of the bombay district police act the extension of the provisions of the prevention of cruelty to animals act 1890 by the bombay .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhagwandas Maganlal Vs. Kaikhushroo Adarji Antia and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-01-1920
Reported in: (1921)ILR45Bom928
..... alleged municipal set back the court s power to rescind or vary order for possession extension of time landlord subsequently claming the premises on the ground that they were required for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Bhagwan Krishna Thorat
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-14-1920
Reported in: (1921)ILR45Bom203
..... animals act xi of 1890 section 1 sub section 2 repeal of section 62 by extension of the latter act to a certain area section 62 of the bombay district police .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKali Nath Roy Vs. the King-emperor
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-09-1920
Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR709
..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhakrishna Ayyar Vs. Swaminatha Ayyar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-03-1920
Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR718
..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNakimo Dewani Vs. Musammat Pemba Dichen
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-13-1920
Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR698
..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMalraju Lakshmi Venkayyamma Row Bahadur Zamindarini Garu Vs. Venkatadr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-07-1920
Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR713
..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaja of Ramnad Vs. Velusami Tevar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-01-1920
Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR701
..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSayyapureddi Chinnayya Dhora Vs. the King-emperor
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-09-1920
Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR705
..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial