Skip to content


Extensively - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: extensively Year: 1920 Page 1 of about 110 results (0.018 seconds)
Jan 12 1920 (FN)

Eastern Extension Tel. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-12-1920

..... the treaty with spain was signed december 10 1898 that the government used the cables extensively for official dispatches which were given priority in transmission but that this was in accordance ..... in the form following the united states government at manila in account with the eastern extension australasia china tel co limited free transmission of american government telegrams over hong kong manila .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 14 1920 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Bhagvan Krishna Thorat

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-14-1920

Reported in: AIR1921Bom249; (1920)22BOMLR892

..... animals liability to be tried under section 62 of the bombay district police act the extension of the provisions of the prevention of cruelty to animals act 1890 by the bombay .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1920 (PC)

Bhagwandas Maganlal Vs. Kaikhushroo Adarji Antia and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-01-1920

Reported in: (1921)ILR45Bom928

..... alleged municipal set back the court s power to rescind or vary order for possession extension of time landlord subsequently claming the premises on the ground that they were required for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 14 1920 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Bhagwan Krishna Thorat

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-14-1920

Reported in: (1921)ILR45Bom203

..... animals act xi of 1890 section 1 sub section 2 repeal of section 62 by extension of the latter act to a certain area section 62 of the bombay district police .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 1920 (PC)

Kali Nath Roy Vs. the King-emperor

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-09-1920

Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR709

..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 1920 (PC)

Radhakrishna Ayyar Vs. Swaminatha Ayyar

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-03-1920

Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR718

..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 1920 (PC)

Nakimo Dewani Vs. Musammat Pemba Dichen

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-13-1920

Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR698

..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 1920 (PC)

Malraju Lakshmi Venkayyamma Row Bahadur Zamindarini Garu Vs. Venkatadr ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-07-1920

Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR713

..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 1920 (PC)

Raja of Ramnad Vs. Velusami Tevar

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-01-1920

Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR701

..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 1920 (PC)

Sayyapureddi Chinnayya Dhora Vs. the King-emperor

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-09-1920

Reported in: (1921)23BOMLR705

..... commissionerincome tax act 1961 s 132 nbsp search and seizure reason to believe commissioner considering extensive information and anonymous petitions and undertaking detailed scrutiny nbsp income tax act 1961 s 132

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //