Skip to content


Expressed - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: expressed Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 312 results (0.072 seconds)
Sep 24 2002 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Express Newspapers Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-24-2002

Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Mad)550

not to be cut down unless limitation therein is imposed expressly by statute or is implicit in the statute here the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2002 (HC)

Express Towers (P) Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-16-2002

Reported in: [2002]123TAXMAN706(Delhi)

s b sinha c j this application has been filed for review of the judgment of this court dated 12...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2002 (TRI)

Express Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-01-2002

Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT567Tri(Mum.)bai

2 the appellant imported in august 1990 a consignment of goods described as gold plated plastic moulded round bowls and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2002 (TRI)

Express Kargo Forwarders Pvt. Vs. Commr. of Cus., Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-15-2002

Reported in: (2002)(143)ELT128Tri(Bang.)

1 appellants are a licenced customs house agents hereinafter referred to as cha at bangalore they are issued a notice...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2002 (TRI)

Indian Express Classified Vs. D.C. Gupta

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on: Oct-30-2002

..... was sent to the appellant at the following address the indian express classified sector 35d sco no 309 310 1st floor chandigarh through its ..... has given the following address in the memo of appeal indian express classified sco no 309 310 sector 35 b chandigarh through its ..... per the copy of the notice placed on record the indian express classified sector 35 d sco no 309 310 1st floor chandigarh .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 2002 (HC)

Chandrakant Bhalekar and ors. Vs. Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) P ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-11-2002

Reported in: 2002(6)BomCR453

..... p m mr r n wani proof reader was going on duty near express towers mr b s adav pulled him towards him adav by holding ..... and 7 30 p m accordingly the meeting was held on ramp of express towers which was in breach of injunction order dated 27 11 1981 ..... slogans upto 25 yards away from the date of the company s premises express towers and its godown were prohibited and also in breach of written .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 2002 (HC)

Indian Express Newspapers, (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-20-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)BomCR667; 2003(86)ECC422; 2002LC584(Bombay); 2003(1)MhLj31

..... were to be imported as project imports under chapter 98 of c ta from the expressed words used in the notification no 132 of 1985 it was evident that the petitioners ..... court to direct that a circular should be given effect to and not the view expressed in a decision of the supreme court or the high court in the instant case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 2002 (HC)

American Express International Banking Corporation Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-25-2002

Reported in: 2003(3)BomCR193; [2002]258ITR601(Bom)

..... the income tax act 1961 preface meaning of broken period interest 5 the assesses american express international banking corporation is a non resident banking company in income tax reference no 346 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 2002 (HC)

State Express Transport Corporation, Tamil Nadu Division Ii Vs. Ponnus ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-19-2002

Reported in: I(2004)ACC43

..... causes court chennai they are being disposed of by the following common judgment the state express transport corporation tamil nadu division 2 formerly known as j jayalalitha transport corporation chennai 5 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 2002 (HC)

American Express International Banking Corporation Vs. Cit

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-25-2002

Reported in: (2002)177CTR(Bom)442

..... and section 28 of the income tax act 1961 preface meaning of broken period interestassesseeamerican express international banking corporation is a nonresident banking company in income tax reference no 346 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //