Express - Judgment Search Results

Southeastern Express Co. Vs. Robertson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the objections they are somewhat involved a prominent one is and it is variously expressed that the express company was not heard in the classification of railroads it being insisted that ..... state found reasons for the difference and there is certainly a difference between railroads and express companies of themselves and necessarily in their relations to their respective businesses and against .....

Adams Express Co. Vs. Darden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... act of congress was in force darden shipped six horses by adams express from latonia kentucky to windsor ontario five of the horses were ..... 100 each was 165 this rate was named to darden by the express company s agent that amount was paid and the company s ..... be more comprehensive than was found to be desirable compare american railway express co v lindenburg 260 u s 584 affirmed certiorari denied mr .....

Southeastern Express Co. Vs. Robertson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... southern district of mississippi syllabus decided upon the authority of southeastern express co v robertson ante 264 u s 535 affirmed appeal from ..... involves the consideration of the privilege tax passed upon in southeastern express co v robertson ante 264 u s 535 just decided it ..... grounds relied on in this case were decided adversely to the express company that is the tax was adjudged to be legal and .....

United States Vs. American Ry. Exp. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the interstate commerce commission establishing through routes for the american railway and southeastern express companies the suit was brought by the former company the seaboard air line railway ..... intervened as plaintiff the commission the other express company the southern traffic league and other shippers associations intervened as defendants page .....

Maharaja of Kolhapur Vs. S. Sundaram Ayyar and 15 ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1925)ILR68Mad1

..... an adoption valid that kamakshi bai saheba has always expressed and now expresses her willingness to forego her own legal claim in ..... implication of marriage it is a convenient english expression to use the original expression in mahratti is to the sword united 161 ..... dispute 300 i agree with the learned chief justice in expressing our indebtedness to the gentlemen who represented the various parties .....

Maharaja of Kolhapur Vs. S. Sundaram Ayyar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1925Mad497

..... their succession and the amount of their shares from certain expressions is the government proceedings it appears probable that government ..... a suddha proper kshatriya is correct it is unnecessary to express any opinion on this much vexed question whether sivaji ..... dispute 250 i agree with the learned chief justice in expressing our indebtedness to the gentlemen who represented the various parties .....

Sagili Pedda Rami Reddi and ors. Vs. Narreddi Gangireddi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1925Mad807

..... text it is evident that the word bandhu in these expressions has a narrower significance than bhinnagotra sapindas the question that ..... thus their lordships think that in the absence of any express authority varying the rule the propositions enunciated in muttuswami v ..... paterna over cognates ex parte materna is in conformity with the express rule that in each class propinquity should be the governing .....

Prdda Rami Reddi and 3 ors. Vs. Gangi Reddi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1925)ILR68Mad722

..... text it is evident that the word bandhu in these expressions has a narrower significance than bhinnagotra sapinda the question that ..... thus their lordships think that in the absence of any express authority varying the rule the propositions enunciated in muttusami v ..... judgment their lordships observe that it is not necessary to express any opinion how far the proposition that preference should be .....

Probhat Chandra Barua Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1924Cal668

..... income tax act had neither specifically nor as an irresistible implication from the language used expressed its intention to cancel or destroy the rights and privileges which had been solemnly granted ..... that nights such as those conferred under the permanent settlement can only be abrogated if express provisions cancelling such a rights are inserted in a subsequent legislative enactment no doubt the .....

Emperor Vs. Probhat Chandra Barua

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1924)ILR51Cal504

..... income tax act had neither specifically nor as an irresistible implication from the language used expressed its intention to cancel or destroy the rights and privileges which had been solemnly ..... that rights such as those conferred under the permanent settlement can only be abrogated if express provisions cancelling such rights are inserted in a subsequent legislative enactment no doubt the maxim .....