Exposing - Judgment Search Results

Heffron Vs. Soc'y for Krishna Consciousness

Court: US Supreme Court

for krishna consciousness inc v colorado state fair and industrial exposition comm n 199 colo 265 610 p 2d 486 1980

Ranchhod and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1981(3)SCALE1802; (1982)1SCC436; 1982(14)LC67(SC)

..... a convenient description to brand a person seldom is the other side of the story exposed to judicial view there is nothing on record to suggest that the appellant was beyond .....

Maitreyee Banerjee Vs. Prabir Kumar Mukherjee

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC17; (1982)3SCC217

..... ii it made them suffer a loss on this delivery of sugar and iii it exposed them to a penalty in case the delivery was short of the quota by a .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... and no government could contemplate with equanimity the inner workings of the government machine being exposed to the gaze of those ready to criticise without adequate knowledge of the background ..... central government or the state governments took important decisions any revolutionary decisions so as to expose high confidential matters to public gaze by following a policy of liberal disclosure of .....

City of Newport Vs. Fact Concerts, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... than compensatory damages for injuries inflicted by mob violence the amendment would not have exposed municipal governments to punitive damages rather it proposed that municipalities shall be liable to ..... was achieved through the respondeat superior liability to which municipalities were and still are exposed tr of oral arg 29 apparently respondent argues that because municipalities were liable for .....

Haig Vs. Agee

Court: US Supreme Court

..... american citizen and a former employee of the central intelligence agency announced a campaign to expose cia officers and agents and to take the measures necessary to drive them out of ..... the united states government he recruits collaborators and trains them in clandestine techniques designed to expose the cover of cia employees and sources agee and his collaborators have repeatedly and publicly .....

The State of Gujarat Vs. Ilac Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1982]50STC24(Guj)

..... manufacturer of cotton waste and therefore the assessee should not be exposed to the liability of forfeiture of the entire amount if the ..... done it is the maximum liability to which a dealer is exposed in the matter of forfeiture of such unauthorised collection of tax ..... is it not unreasonable to forfeit huge sums and still to expose the dealer to several actions is it not discriminatory to make .....

Uday Kaushish (Minor by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Mrs. Sheila K ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1982)29CTR(Del)217; [1982]137ITR906(Delhi)

..... devon hospital management committee 1966 2 all er 799 ca or by exposing him to a new hazard or as when he is prevented ..... reputations or careers their report may lead to judicial proceedings it may expose persons to criminal prosecutions or to civil actions seeing that their ..... sorabjee contended that the wto in acting under s 16a would be exposing an assessed to a new hazard or to pains penalties or .....

Indian Organic Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Chemtex Fibres Inc.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1981)83BOMLR406; 1982MhLJ698

..... measure was to stifle further litigation by way of suits to expose a public scandal 32 it is quite clear that had the ..... only after a copy of the rejoinder was received by it which exposed the underlying infirmities of the approach in the return earlier filed ..... court fees further whatever was earlier done as reflected in the returns exposes the erroneous legal basis of the government s view which is .....

Siddharth Mohanlal Sharma Vs. South Gujarat University

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1982)1GLR233

..... it for common misconducts 3 the reduction of penalty in the case of petitioner would expose the university to a charge of discrimination because in similar cases identical penally was imposed ..... imposition of penalty where both are found to have committed a similar malpractice would necessarily expose the university to the charge of discrimination betrays ignorance of the true principle governing the .....