Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Year: 2003 Page 78 of about 4,577 results (0.199 seconds)

M. Chella Rao Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD538

..... held a post not below the rank of additional registrar of co-operative societies'. likewise, section 76 of the act deals with appeal and section 77 of the act deals with revision. section 121 of the act deals with bar of jurisdiction of court. likewise, section 126 of the act deals with notice necessary in suits. no doubt, these provisions were referred just to convince ..... 99 before the a.p. co-operative tribunal under section 76 of the act and the tribunal dismissed the same by orders dated 19-9-2001. while dismissing the said appeal, the liability was fixed as against the other defendants also including ..... tune of rs. 1,07,880/-. it was also stated that while making the said order, no show-cause notice as contemplated under section 60(1) of the act was issued to the petitioner under section 51 of the act. it is further staled that an appeal was fifed by sri ekambar rao, the 4th defendant, vide o.a. no. 221/ .....

Gouranga Pradhan Vs. State and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2003(II)OLR316

..... 3. shri padhi, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that none of the ingredients of section 493 being satisfied, the learned magistrate could not have taken cognizance of the said offence and has mechanically acted on the basis of the charge-sheet submitted by the investigating officer. shri padhi further submitted that for ..... the purpose of section 493 of the penal code, a complaint is required to be filed and on the ..... that the learned magistrate was justified in taking cognizance. here the case is completely different. the charge-sheet having been filed for commission of offence under section 493 of the penal code which is non-cognizable offence, the learned magistrate could not have entertained the charge-sheet and take cognizance on the basis of .....

Prahallad Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2003(II)OLR513

..... i.r. was registered as jagatsinghpur p.s. case no. 46 of 2000 corresponding to g.r. case no. 151 of 2000 under section 498/(a)/34 i.p.c. and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act and the present opposite party no. 2, who was the a.s.i. of police of krushnananapur out-post under tirtol p.s., was ..... in his report has come to the following conclusions :'5. from the register (r.28) maintained in the court of civil judge (jr.divn)-cum-judge-in-charge. copying section, jagatsinghpur' it appears that under serial no. 766 the informant-kalyanilata swain made an application to obtain certified copy of the seizure list in question and other documents on 28 ..... created a false seizure list and a zimanama by taking signatures from the petitioner and his daughter. the petitioner filed an application before the s.d.j.m., jagatsinghpur, under section 457 of the code, which was registered as crl. misc. case no. 79 of 2000, detailing the circumstances under which the petitioner on 4.3.2000 accompanied the .....

Krishnan and anr. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC2978; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)458; 2003CriLJ3705; 2003(3)JKJ32[SC]; JT2003(6)SC151; 2003(5)SCALE484; (2003)7SCC56

..... a prearranged plan which is proved either from conduct or from circumstances or from incriminating facts. the principles of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act is embodied in section 34 of the ipc. the existence of common intention is to be the basis of liability. that is why the prior concert and the prearranged plan ..... is the foundation of common intention to established liability and guilt.31. section 34 deals with the doing of separate acts, similar or diverse, by several persons; if all are done in furtherance of common intention, each person is liable for the result of ..... them all as if he had done them himself; for 'that act' and 'the act' in the latter part of the section must include the whole section covered by a 'criminal act' in the first part, because they refer to it. constructive liability under section 34 may arise in three well-defined cases. a person may be constructively liable .....

Subbiah Pillai (Died) and ors. Vs. M.A. Thirunavukkarasu Pillai (Died) ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ396

..... of this court and : air1984mad235 , i find that the jurisdiction of the civil court is excluded in view of the express bar under section 16-a of act x of 1969 and under section 6 of act xxv of 1955.35. even on factual aspects, plaintiff's case is found to be wanting, uncertain and unclear as to whether the ..... a full bench of this court in periathambi goundan ..vs.. district revenue officer : air1980mad180 held that the civil court's jurisdiction is expressly excluded in view of section 16 of act x of 1969 in respect of the question whether a particular person is a cultivating tenant or not.27. in the above decision of the full bench in ..... tenant'. the jurisdiction of the civil court is not at all attracted, merely because the plaintiff has conveniently omitted to seek declaration under the simple device of invoking section 27(c) of the act. 33. at this juncture, we may usefully refer to the decision reported in : air1984mad235 (pankajam ..vs.. chinnaswamy naidu), wherein it was held, 'where .....

R. Dhandayuthapani Vs. C.R. Kaleel, Enforcement Officer, Employees Pro ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2004]118CompCas167(Mad); (2004)ILLJ491Mad

..... petitioner cannot be proceeded with; that the proviso to section 14a of the act comes into play only at a much later stage, viz., after discharge of initial onus by the complainant. 6. during arguments, the learned counsel for the ..... the evidence as to on what basis such an assertion is made by the complainant; that the primary onus lies with the complainant in an offence under section 14a of the act to show that the persons sought tobe proceeded against were directors in the a1 company and in the absence of any such averment in the complainant, the ..... of the a1 firm viz. m/s. komminar textiles (p) limited, pethappampatti, udumalpet taluk, which is an `establishment' within the meaning of the said act; that under sections 6 and 6a of the act r/w. paragraphs 30 and 38 of the employees' provident funds scheme, the accused are required to pay the member's and employer's contributions to .....

Dr. P. Ramasamy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary to Govt ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ792

..... servants of the university, as also fix their emoluments, define their duties and the conditions of service and provide for filling up of temporary vacancies. section 24 of the act which deals with the powers of the academic council, in sub-clause (c), empowers it to make proposals to the senate and the syndicate for ..... persons to such professorships, readerships, lecturerships and other posts and determine their conditions of service in accordance with the statutes. under section 24 of the said act, the executive council shall be the principal executive body of the university. its constitution and the terms of office of its members and its powers ..... as teachers by the ordinances. no difference based on the method of appointment to these posts has been spelt out in the definition. under section 5(7) of the said act, the university has the power to institute professorships, readerships, lecturerships, and other teaching or academic posts required by the university and to appoint .....

Manoj Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... truck shall be released to the petitioner, if not released earlier.'20. i do not find any force in this submission of mr. shukla. neither section 68 nor section 52 (3) of the act provides for release of the vehicle on payment of fine. judge made law is one of the sources of law and by process of interpretation such ..... custody shall be discharged and property released, as the case may be and further proceeding shall not continue against such person, which would be evident from section 68 (2) of the act. in such circumstances, i am of the opinion that the authorised officer did not err in proceeding with the confiscation proceeding and ultimately passing the order ..... and as such the authorised office ought to have allowed the same and should not have proceeded with the confiscation proceeding. in this connection he submits that section 68 of the act obliges for release of the vehicle. in support of his submission mr. shukla has placed reliance on a judgment of the supreme court in the case .....

In Re: Moschip Semiconductor Technology Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD827; [2004]120CompCas108(AP); [2004]50SCL405(AP)

..... on the other hand, is a foreign company which comes within the definition of 'body corporate' as can be seen from section 2(7) of the act and under sub-section (4) of section 394 of the act the transferor company can be a body corporate, there can be a valid scheme of arrangement for amalgamation in between them. therefore, ..... . the scheme is subject to the approval of the appropriate authorities.6. the transferee company filed c.a. no. 304/2003 on 28.3.2003 under section 391 of the act. notices have been directed to be issued to all the shareholders of the company and publication in the newspaper, namely, 'business line' has been ordered. ..... joined the transferee company in this petition seeking the necessary sanction from this court. it is appropriate, therefore, here to consider section 394 of the act, the provision germane in the context. the said section provides for sanctioning of the scheme when such a scheme has been proposed for the reconstruction of the company or companies or .....

Paikas Khaka Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR529; [2003(2)JCR336(Jhr)]

..... pleadings, right up to supplementary affidavit, the petitioner did not whisper about his having filed suit on 6.11.1990 under the provisions of section 10 of the indian divorce act. when the respondent nos. 3 and 4 brought photocopies of the certified copies of this document along with the order sheet, the petitioner filed ..... second marriage praying for dissolution of the first marriage. they have also stated that the petitioner gave a false declaration which is punishable under section 66 of the indian christian marriage act, 1872. they have also stated that the petitioner has come with unclean hands and all these actions amount to misconduct on his part. these ..... . these respondents have brought on record annexure a which is the photocopy of the certified copy of the plaint filed by the petitioner under section 10 of the indian divorce act praying before the judicial commissioner, ranchi that the marriage between him and ursulla be dissolved by a decree of divorce. annexure a/1 is .....