Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 1989 Page 3 of about 1,699 results (0.119 seconds)

Jaloba Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1989Supp(2)SCC197

..... is on the face of it untenable in the light of sections 6 and 9 of the act. section 6 lays down that if in any area notified by the state government under the act a person contravenes any provision or rule made under the arms act, the explosives act, the explosive substances act and the inflammable substances act then he is liable to enhanced punishment as provided for in ..... the section. section 9 lays down that notwithstanding anything contained in the code, every offence punishable under the act or any rule made thereunder shall be triable only by the designated court within whose local .....

Abdula Pochamma Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1989Supp(2)SCC152

..... found to contain a hand grenade and some terrorist literature. she was, therefore apprehended and a case was registered against her under sections 3 and 4 of the act and section 5 of the explosive substances act. the designated judge accepted the evidence of pw 3 and the other prosecution witnesses and convicted and sentenced the appellant as stated above ..... three years and to pay a fine of rs 100, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. she has also been convicted under section 5 of the explosive substances act and sentenced to undergo ri for two years, the said sentences to run concurrently with the former sentence.2. the prosecution case was that at ..... not proved in an acceptable manner that what had been seized from the appellant was indeed a hand grenade or any other explosive substance so as to attract the operation of section 3(3) of the act. the appellant is, therefore, entitled to the benefit of doubt. consequently, the appeal is allowed and the conviction and .....

Metro Exports Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1989(24)LC424(Kerala)

..... pi on 11.12.1984 stating that the item imported namely, pentaerythritol was required mostly in the manufacture of paints and to some extent, in the manufacture of explosives and that it was not required for the purposes mentioned in item c in column 4 of entry g. 2 of appendix 17 of the import policy. the ..... freshening chemicals, it would appear that the 2nd respondent discovered later that pentaerythritol was used mostly only in the manufacture of paints and sometimes in the manufacture of explosives as well. according to them it was not used for the purposes mentioned in column 4 against entry g. 2(c) of appendix 17 to the import policy ..... shall not be taken against the petitioner under the various provisions mentioned. it is a notice under section 124 of the customs act, 1962 and alleges violation of certain provisions of the customs act and of the import and export (control) act. petitioner is called upon to submit written reply and to show cause why the action proposed shall .....

Abdul Razak Abdul Wahab Sheikh Vs. S.N. Sinha, Commissioner of Police, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC226; 1989CriLJ2303; (1989)2GLR940; JT1989(1)SC478; 1989(1)SCALE542; (1989)2SCC222; [1989]1SCR890; 1989(2)LC36(SC)

..... of bombaypolice act.11. it has also ..... 2/88 under section 307, 120(b) of pending i.p.c. under section 3(1) of for exa-terrorists act, under section 4, mention.5 of explosives act,under section 25(l)(c)(l) of arms act and under section 135(1) ..... p.s. kalupur case no. 372/85 under section 25(a)(c) of arms pending in act, sections 4, 5 of court explosive act.2. p.s. kalupur case no. 456/87 under section 120(b) of i.p.c. pending under section 25(1)(e)(c) of for exa-arms act and under section (1) mention of the terrorists act, 1985.3. p.s. kalupur case no. .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Joginderpal Mohinderpal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1989(2)ARBLR159(SC); JT1989(2)SC89; 1989(1)SCALE664; (1989)2SCC347; [1989]1SCR880; 1989(2)LC46(SC)

..... under the said punjab rice order and to that the millers submitted. this item is, therefore, allowed.4 the respondent filed an application under section 14 of the arbitration act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') for filing of the award and prayed for making the award the rule of the court. the appellant on 25th may, 1982 filed ..... of disputes between the parties, has a tradition in india. it has a social purpose to fulfil today. it has a great urgency today when there has been an explosion of litigations in the courts of law established by the sovereign power. new rights created, or awareness of these rights, the erosion of faith in the intrinsic sense ..... and norms which will create confidence, not only by doing justice between the parties, but by creating a sense that justice appears to have been done. sections 30 and 33 of the act provide for the grounds on which an award of the arbitrator can be set aside. these were mainly, until recent changes made by statutory laws in .....

Fort Wayne Books, Inc. Vs. Indiana

Court : US Supreme Court

..... state and federal obscenity violations as predicate offenses under federal rico, 18 u.s.c. 1961 et seq., senator helms stated: "[w]e are experiencing an explosion in the volume and availability of pornography in our society. today it is almost impossible to open mail, turn on the television, or walk in the downtown ..... presented in actual cases. . . ." see public workers v. mitchell, 330 u. s. 75 , 330 u. s. 89 (1947); see also electric bond & share co. v. sec, 303 u. s. 419 , 303 u. s. 443 (1938). [ footnote 12 ] we do not hold today that the pretrial seizure of petitioner's nonexpressive property was invalid. petitioner did ..... was charged with distributing obscene matter in violation of an indiana statute (a misdemeanor) and in addition with rico violations (felonies) based on these alleged predicate acts of obscenity. the trial court dismissed the rico charges on the ground that the rico statute was unconstitutionally vague as applied to obscenity predicate offenses. the indiana court .....

Challa Ramkonda Reddy and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh by District ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1990ACJ668; AIR1989AP235

..... same proceedings......againstthe secretary of state in council of india as they could have done against the said company.....'. this concept was reiterated insub-section (2) of section 32 of the government of india act, 1915, which declared 'every person shall have the same remedies against the secretary of stale in council as he might have had ..... to the addl. district& sessions judge, kurnool, that only two constables were guarding the jail that night. he opined : 'i am inclined to think that the alleged explosion in cell no. 7 took (place) for want of adequate vigilance on the purl of the police personnel.....'. his notes ofinspect ion appended to ex.a-9 show that ..... this constitution...... '6. (1) for the removal of doubts it is hereby declared that if any person alleges that any of the provisions of the foregoing sections or section of this constitution, has been, is being.or is likely to be contravened in relation to him, then, without prejudice to any other action with respect to .....

Indian Aluminium Co. Vs. Third Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 96CWN827,(1993)IIILLJ199Cal

..... of the respondent no. 2 was without justification. it was further held that it was a case of retrenchment without complying with the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act. the tribunal further held that, since the termination of service of the respondent no. 2 was not justified, he was entitled to reinstatement in ..... which sen was asked to perform as a geologist was totally different from that of a transport engineer under burma shell co. or aircraft maintenance engineer under indian explosive. he merely took the assistance of manual labourers, such as drillers and samplers. the surveyors would merely locate the drill holes according to the plan prepared by ..... the disputed property was a tank.21. in the case of baldev singh v. union explosives, 76 cwn 342 it was held by this court that the appellant baldev singh was not a workman within the definition of industrial disputes act and could not raise an industrial dispute and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain or .....

Mistretta Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... certificate; operation of a common carrier under the influence of drugs that causes injury and alteration of one motor vehicle identification number; illegal trafficking in explosives and trespass; interference with a flight attendant and unlawful conduct relating to contraband cigarettes; aggravated assault and smuggling $11,000 worth of fish." dissenting ..... the field of criminal sentencing provide a factual background and statutory context that give content to the mandate of the commission. see american power & light co. v. sec, 329 u. s. 90 , 329 u. s. 104 -105 (1946). [ footnote 11 ] petitioner argues that the excessive breadth of congress' delegation to ..... situated offenders and in uncertainty as to an offender's actual date of release by executive branch parole officials, congress passed the sentencing reform act of 1984 (act), which, inter alia, created the united states sentencing commission as an independent body in the judicial branch with power to promulgate binding sentencing .....

Bihar State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Dhanawat Rice and Oil Mills

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC1030; 1989(2)BLJR59; JT1989(1)SC425; 1989(1)SCALE162; (1989)1SCC452; [1989]1SCR168; 1989(1)LC379(SC)

..... or using the electrical energy to be supplied under this agreement either in whole, or in part due to strikes, riots, fire, floods, explosions, act of god or any other case reasonably beyond control or if the board is prevented from supplying or unable to supply such electrical energy owing to any or all of ..... contingency and it provides for the failure on the part of the supplier and also failure on the part of consumer in the circumstances like strike, riot, fire, flood, explosion or act of god or any other reason beyond the control of either of the parties. clause 13 of the agreement reads:if at any time the consumer is prevented from receiving .....