Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 1949 Page 10 of about 527 results (0.172 seconds)

Virendra Kumar Tripathi Vs. the Crown

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1951CriLJ3

..... the three present cases there ace subsequent orders of the chief commissioner farther extending the period of detention which have been passed under the proper section, namely, sub-section (4) of section 3 of the act of 1949 and his argument is that the latter part of the remarks cited above applies to these oases, and now that the detenus are ..... of law was invoked.13. this brings us to the question of the effect of the non-compliance of the authorities with the provisions of sub-section (6) of section 3 of the act of 1919. it is not disputed that since the present detenus were originally arrested and ordered to be detained, upto the present date, none of ..... on 18th march the chief commissioner passed an order extending the period of detention for three months from 18th march to 17th june. still purporting to act under section 3 (4) of the act of 1947, the chief commissioner on 11th june passed an order extending the period of detention for two months from 17th june to 16th august and .....

M.A. Jalil Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1952All550

..... justice that these cases be listed for hearing before a judge of the lucknow bench. reference was made to section 108, government of india act 1915-16, as amended by the government of india act 1919 and to sections 219 and 223, government of india act, 1935. the learned counsel also referred to the case of shell co. of australia ltd. v. federal commissioner ..... in the matter of the preparation of the cauee list of the high court and an order passed under section 24, civil p. c., cannot but be misleading. we are satisfied, therefore, that the order of 29-4-1949, passed by the acting chief justice, was not a judicial order. it was an administrative order.7. we are clear, however, that ..... . judged by this standard the order passed by the hon'ble acting chief justice on 29-4-1949, cannot be said to be a judicial order. reference was in course of argument made by mr pandey to section 24, civil p. c. we are clear that there is no analogy between an order of transfer or withdrawal passed by the high .....

United States Vs. Spelar

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . 29, 35, 66. the attorney general's revised version was h.r. 6463, 402(12). [ footnote 9 ] the shape of the federal tort claims act was largely determined during its consideration in the course of the 77th congress. subsequently, the bill was reintroduced without substantial modification or further hearings until its enactment during the ..... traditional immunity turn upon the fortuitous circumstance of the injured party's citizenship. the page 338 u. s. 221 amended version identified the coverage of the act with the scope of united states sovereignty. the record of the hearings tells us why. we quote the pertinent colloquy between assistant attorney general francis m. ..... of the statute were not enough, however, to sustain our result, we think the legislative history behind this provision concludes all doubt. the federal tort claims act of 1946 was the product of some twenty-eight years of congressional drafting and redrafting, page 338 u. s. 220 amendment and counter-amendment. [ footnote 6 .....

Judhisthir Chandra Adak and anr. Vs. P.R. Mukherjee and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1950Cal577,54CWN222

..... are entitled to make the application.10. the next question is whether the tribunal in making the award of 20-5-1949 has acted in excess of its jurisdiction. the tribunal has only a limited jurisdiction under section 19(3) proviso, viz., to decide whether there has been a material change in the circumstances, in which the award in ..... thing the tribunal can do and nothing else. an award can be modified only under section 15. sub-section (4) of that section says :'save as provided in the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 19 an award declared to be binding under that section shall not be called in question in any manner.' the award in the proviso referred ..... whereas it is expedient that the said award should be referred to a tribunal constituted under the industrial disputes act, 1947.now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by the proviso to sub-section (3) of 19 of the said act, the governor is pleased to appoint sri p.b. mukerjee, additional district judge, to be the tribunal .....

Dalsukhrai Jaidayal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and C.P. and Berar

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1950All255; [1950]18ITR546(All)

..... answer to question no. 1 is that the loss of rs. 6,411 in the year 1939-40 in speculative business in calcutta could be set off under section 24 (2), income-tax act against the profits made in the speculative business by the calcutta branch in the year 1940-41.11. as regards question no. 2, my answer is that the ..... of the loss carried forward, they allowed rs. 3,006 and disallowed' the balance of rs. 3,405. this they did by following the clear wordings of section 24 (2) of the income-tax act which says that such loss carried forward can be set off against the profits and gains if any of the 'same business.' it is contended on behalf ..... inter-connection, interlacing, inter-dependence and unity embracing the two businesses. no such attempt seems to have been made by the appellate tribunal.6. on an application made under section 66 (1) to state a case the appellate tribunal refused the application on the ground that no question of law arose for determination. on a further reference to this court .....

Ram Rup Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1951CriLJ930

..... taken any precaution or used the slightest circumspection with regard to the safety of others. they were found guilty under section 304a, because the death of the deceased was directly due to what they held to be a criminally negligent act on the part of both of the accused:it is difficult to see', said the learned judges, 'how a ..... might have been avoided by the exercise of reasonable care; thus a negligent act or omission is willed, because the person responsible does not will to prevent the commission or omission.6. if it was necessary to hold i would hold that ram rup, in the words of section 107, expl. 2 read with ss. 336 and 279 prior to ..... person can 'abet' the 'negligence' of another without himself being equally 'negligent' within the meaning of the section, having regard to the definition of 'negligence' above quoted.the .....

In Re: E.P.T. Valyudam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad324

..... in the nature of a curative measure and in my view, it is perfectly open to any legislature or legislative authority specially constituted, such as the governor acting under section 88, constitution act, to enact 'ex post facto' legislation. very often, it may be desirable and necessary that such 'ex post facto' legislation should be enacted by the ..... , as well as defects and vagueness of the same are such infirmities as would invalidate the detention because of not conforming to the provisions of the act and since sections 4-a and 19 of ordinance iv [4] of 1949 declare that orders of detention should not be questioned or deemed to be invalid or unlawful ..... for a further period or periods not exceeding three years in the aggregate', were substituted while matters were in this state, the governor of madras, acting under section 88(1), government of india act, 1935, promulgated ordinance i [1] of 1949 on 11th august 1949 with the object of the removal of doubts regarding the validity of the .....

Harchanda and anr. Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1950All355

..... that they were there for a subsidiary purpose, namely, for the purpose of convicting the remaining two of riots and of the offence of simple hurt under section 323 read with section 149, penal code. the learned assistant government advocate has referred me to a ruling reported in emperor v. ram adhin singh : air1931all439 in support of ..... and convicted the remaining two. his lordship held that the remaining two persons could not be convicted under section 147 as well as under section 328 read with section 149, penal code. it was observed :'the entire prosecution evidence in the case has been laid before me and it is clear from ..... 32. in ram rup v. emperor : air1945all31 , waliullah j. (now my lord the acting chief justice), had a case before him in which seven persons were put on trial before the sessions judge for offences under sections 147 and 323, read with section 149, penal code. the sessions judge acquitted five persons giving them the benefit of doubt .....

Ramamurthi Ayyar and ors. Vs. Kuppuswami Ayyar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad621

..... . 1942 mad 183 should have been the other way. it cannot also be presumed that when the father gave an indemnity he was doing either a grossly unjust act or a flagrantly dishonest act. indeed he was trying to be honest and straight, forward in his dealings with the vendee. he was selling a property in the circumstances he thought it was ..... pain not only of losing their share of the free 'unspent' portion of the price but on paying damages to the vendee if they dared to question their father's act in selling their property. relying upon this finding he argued that a promise made by a father which was so much at variance with his duty and which, in any ..... of his father in regard to a covenant of indemnity given by him. defendants 1, 2 and 3 are the sons of one venkatarama iyer. venkatarama iyer for himself and acting as guardian of his minor sons, defendants 2 and 3, and defendant 1 as a major executed a sale-deed in favour of the plaintiff's father, ramaswami iyer on .....

Arumuga Mudaliar Vs. Muruga Mudaliyar (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad603

..... in proof of the contract to support the relief of specific performance in a suit for such relief--a difficulty which does not exist after the amendment of section 49, registration act, by the addition of the proviso thereto in 1929--such a document can be received in proof of the contract in a suit like the present for ..... contended for the appellant that the document falls within clause (d) or clause (b) or at any rate, within clause (c) of section 17(l), registration act, and that under section 49 of the act it cannot be received as evidence of any transaction affecting the immovable property comprised therein. it is urged that if it cannot be received as evidence ..... that raises the question, what is the meaning of the words 'any transaction affecting such property' in clause (c) of that section. the contract, in my opinion, is such a transaction, although as section 54, t. p. act, declares it does not of itself create an interest in the property. so much is clear from the ruling of a full .....