Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: union territory consumer disputes redressal commission ut chandigarh Page 16 of about 152 results (0.086 seconds)

Jul 10 1991 (TRI)

Shri Raj Kumar Bajaj Vs. Chandigarh Housing Board

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... complainant 6. we, therefore, accept this complaint and direct the respondent board to allot a category-ii of revised design (1228 sq.ft.) constructed by it in section 45-a, chandigarh or in a contiguous sector, which is available or will become available. the allotment shall be made within a period of three monism from this ..... amongst the applicants was held on 20.02.1988 and the complainant was declared successful. he was accordingly allotted the first floor in a category-ii flat in section 47, chandigarh vide allotment letter dated 21.04.88 (copy annexure-c/1). the complainant started paying installments and claimed to have paid all the installments due ..... ' and hence a person affected by the same can claim relief under the consumer protection act. the objection is, therefore, overruled. 4. on merits, the respondent cannot get out of its own act of having called upon the allottees of flats in section 38 and 47, chandigarh to exercise their option for allotment of a flat of category-ii .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1991 (TRI)

BhasIn Industrial Corporation Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... found that goods worth rs. 32,000/-, which were covered by the insurance policy, had been stolen. an f.i.r. was lodged with the police under section 380 ipc. thereafter a claim was also made to the two insurance companies with which there was lengthy correspondence but nothing tangible came out. the complainant claimed compensation being ..... complaint was made on the 21st of july, 1989. 4. these facts weigh very heavily against the complainant. his bonafides in invoking the protection of the consumer protection act, 1986 in july, 1989 for a loss be sustained in 1984 are questionable. and i am, therefore, inclined to dismiss this complaint without even going into the ..... because of scarce finance. the only reason cited for this inaction is "lengthy correspondence" between the parties surely not a good enough justification. 3. the consumer protection act was placed on the statute book in 1986. it came into force w.e.f. the 15th of april, 1987. the chandigarh state commission was established on the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //