Court : Supreme Court of India
..... he furnishes bail in the sum of rupees one lakh with two sureties for like amount", finds constrained applicability in respect of cases under the ndps act, in light of section 37 of the act. therefore, this court in achint navinbhai patel vs. state of gujarat & anr. [(2002) 10 scc 529] observed that "it has been ..... the facts of the case and can satisfactorily depose in court on his behalf.(4) this section applies to the following government scientific experts, namely:-(a) any chemical examiner or assistant chemical examiner to government;(b) the chief controller of explosives;(c) the director of the finger print bureau;(d) the director, haffkeine institute, bombay ..... a provision, which otherwise appears as a standard one in other legislations. the legislature, unlike for the ndps act, enacted section 25(4) of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, section 13(2) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 and rule 56 of the central excise rules, 1944, permitting a time period of thirty, ten .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... bail in the sum of rupees one lakh with two sureties for like amount , finds constrained applicability in respect of cases under the ndps act, in light of section 37 of the act. therefore, this court in achint navinbhai patel vs. state of gujarat & anr.[2]. observed that it has been repeatedly stressed that ..... the facts of the case and can satisfactorily depose in court on his behalf. (4) this section applies to the following government scientific experts, namely:- (a) any chemical examiner or assistant chemical examiner to government; (b) the chief controller of explosives; (c) the director of the finger print bureau; (d) the director, haffkeine institute, ..... a provision, which otherwise appears as a standard one in other legislations. the legislature, unlike for the ndps act, enacted section 25(4) of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, section 13(2) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 and rule 56 of the central excise rules, 1944, permitting a time period of thirty, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... s rigorous imprisonment while a sentence of ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of rs.2000/- was awarded to the appellant under section 3 of the explosive substances act read with section 34 of the ipc. criminal appeal no.514/2000 filed by the appellant before the high court against the judgment and order of ..... convicted for offences punishable under sections 302, 307, 427 read with section 34 of the ipc and section 3 of the explosive substances act, 1908 read with section 34 of the ipc by the xxi additional city civil and sessions judge, bangalore. for the offence of murder punishable under section 302 read with section 34 of the ipc the ..... to the learned amicus curiae, forthcoming in the present case; which should, argued the learned counsel, entitle the appellant to an acquittal. 15. section 133 of the evidence act, makes an accomplice a competent witness against the accused person and declares that a conviction shall not be illegal merely because it proceeds upon the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2013SC336; AIR2013SCW328; 2013(2)SCC177
..... parties, we are satisfied, that there is prima facie material, to establish the involvement of the petitioners in activities violating the provisions of the explosive substances act, 1908. the consequences of such violation are extremely serious. the minimum punishment on conviction, is 10 years rigorous imprisonment. for more serious activities ..... that the statements of armugam, ganeshan, sashi, shanmugam, mageshwaram and karupaiah, recorded under section 164 of the code of criminal procedure, also revealed, the involvement of petitioner r. chidambaram in the procurement of illegal explosive substances, and of their use in his quarrying activities. it was also submitted, that the ..... kannapan and selvam, which establishes their relationship. n. kannapan was also found to be associated in the matter, as shanmugam in his statement under section 164 of the code of criminal procedure affirmed, that the petitioner n. kanappan was using ammonium nitrate for quarrying operations. in this behalf it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... parties, we are satisfied, that there is prima facie material, to establish the involvement of the petitioners in activities violating the provisions of the explosive substances act, 1908. the consequences of such violation are extremely serious. the minimum punishment on conviction, is 10 years rigorous imprisonment. for more serious activities ..... that the statements of armugam, ganeshan, sashi, shanmugam, mageshwaram and karupaiah, recorded under section 164 of the code of criminal procedure, also revealed, the involvement of petitioner r. chidambaram in the procurement of illegal explosive substances, and of their use in his quarrying activities. it was also submitted, that the ..... kannapan and selvam, which establishes their relationship. n. kannapan was also found to be associated in the matter, as shanmugam in his statement under section 164 of the code of criminal procedure affirmed, that the petitioner n. kanappan was using ammonium nitrate for quarrying operations. in this behalf it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... duty under heading 21.05, sub-heading 2105.00 -"ice-cream and other edible ice, whether or not containing cocoa". invoking the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 11a of the act, additional duty was also demanded. a proposal for imposing penalty on the assessee and on their managing director was also initiated.4. while adjudicating on ..... in market parlance. for example, if a type of explosive (rdx) is known in the market as kala sabun by a section of the people who uses these explosives, the manufacturer or importer of these explosives cannot claim that the explosives must be classified as soap and not as explosive."27. there is a catena of decisions that has dealt ..... on and from the 1st day of march, 1997 and ending with 28th february, 2001.now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 11c of the said act, the central government hereby directs that the whole of the duty of excise payable on such softy ice cream and non alcoholic beverage dispensed through vending .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , 2012, the police registered fir no.4 of 2012 in respect of offences alleged to have been committed under sections 307, 427 and 120-b of the indian penal code in connection with an explosion involving an israeli embassy vehicle carrying the wife of an israeli diplomat which had occurred at about 3.15 p.m ..... it may be useful to indicate that the provisions of section 167(2) of the code were modified by virtue of section 43d of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967. the modification of the provisions of section 167(2) cr.p.c. by virtue of section 43d of the aforesaid act is extracted hereinbelow :-43d. modified application of certain provisions ..... . at the aurangzeb road/safdarjung road crossing. the alleged offences were later amended to cover sections 16 and 18 of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967.6. on 6th march .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... no.ii.] charge-sheet against 14 accused persons under section 120b, 121a, 122, 123 and 188 of indian penal code, section 3 and 5 of tada, section 4, 5 and 6 of explosive substances act, section 25(1a) of arms act, section 135 of customs act and section 135 (1) of bombay police act. second [list of persons charge-sheeted in the second ..... , altogether 62 persons were charge-sheeted.the designated court framed charges against 60 accused persons under section 120b of the indian penal code, section 3 and 5 of tada, section 4, 5 and 6 of the explosive substances act and section 25 (1a) of the arms act. however, accused no. 57 namely, mohmad harun @ munna @ riyaz @ chhote rahim, has ..... tada, the confessions recorded cannot be looked into to establish the guilt under the aforesaid acts. hence, the conviction of the accused under section 7 and 25(1a) of the arms act and section 4, 5 and 6 of the explosive substances act cannot also be allowed to stand.as we have held the conviction and sentence of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... chaibasa p.s. case no.10/01 u/ss. 307/120(b) ipc and section 4/5/6 of explosive substance act.b. bistupur p.s. case no.125/03 u/s. 25 (1-b)/a/26/35 arms act.c. adityapur p.s. case no.139/04 u/ss.392/411 i.p.c ..... chandra jew). if the above tests are applied to the facts of the present case, the police must get protection given under section 197 of the code because the acts complained of are so integrally connected with or attached to their office as to be inseparable from it. it is not possible ..... p.s. case no.53 of 2004 dated 2/7/2004 u/s. 307/427/353/34 ipc read with section 25(1b)(a)/26/27/35 of the arms act corresponding to g.r. case no.1065 of 2004. he has confirmed that on the written request made by the ..... unimpeachable circumstances on record which may establish at the outset that the police officer or public servant was acting in performance of his official duty and is entitled to protection given under section 197 of the code. it is not possible for us to hold that in such a case, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... accused persons one of them being the present appellant, a national of pakistan for the commission of offences under sections 302/307/120-b of indian penal code (for short, ipc) and sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act, 1908 (for short, es act ). the appellant and the other three accused were committed to the court of session by the concerned magistrate. the ..... three accused other than the appellant were discharged by the additional sessions judge, delhi. the appellant was charged under sections 302/307 ipc and section 3 and, in the .....
Tag this Judgment!