Court : Mumbai Goa
..... (xiv) in the alternative, even if, the incident is believed the case cannot at all come under the definition of murder and at the most it can fall under section 304 (ii) of i.p.c. 32. mr. rivonkar, learned public prosecutor, submitted that if some offence is disclosed, a police officer can make preliminary inquiries and ..... is proved to be homicidal? (ii) whether the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused persons caused the death of vasant sastikar? (iii) whether the act of the accused in causing death of vasant sastikar amounts to murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder? 26. insofar as the first question is concerned, homicidal death ..... they had injuries on their person they were referred to azilo hospital, mapusa. the arrest panchanama is at exhibit 53 for which babasaheb shetty (p.w.8) acted as one of the pancha witnesses. the clothes of the accused persons were attached. statement of witnesses were recorded by p.w.15. exhibits were forwarded to central .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... 2000, by filing an application for impleading them as parties. however, morajkar group withdrew the said civil application no. 444/2006 on 09/06/2009. under section 40 of the evidence act, previous judgments are admissible in support of a plea of res judicata in civil cases. if not res judicata, the principles analogous to that are applicable. in ..... be no dispute in respect of the principal laid down in the case of jacinto minguel de quadros barretto (supra), that the proceedings in reference under section 30 of the act are in the nature of interpleader's suit and parties are required to plead their case and lead evidence in support of the cases. there can be no ..... /- as compensation for the said acquired land. however, there was dispute regarding the ownership of the property. hence, the l.a.o. made reference under section 30 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (the act, for short) which gave rise to the said l. a. case no. 12 of 1991. 3. for the sake of convenience, the appellants shall .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... the state of goa. at the same time, the state government declared that in its opinion, sub-section 1 of section 17 of the l.a act is applicable and, therefore, by virtue of sub-section 4 of section 17 of the l.a act, section 5-a thereof shall not apply in respect of the said acquisition. 7} it is the case of ..... of the executive power of the union government is permissible hereunder. in appreciating the above submission made on behalf of the petitioners it may be seen that section 3(ee) of the act defines the expression appropriate government to mean, in relation to the acquisition of land for the purposes of the union, the central government, and in ..... in official gazette dated 8th august 2008. the notification was then published by affixation on 14th august 2008. this reply does not confirm with the requirement of section 4(1) of the act. 111} the learned advocate general, in reply to these submissions of mr.sonak which are adopted by other counsel, has urged that the statements made in .....
Tag this Judgment!