Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 23 of about 4,661 results (0.104 seconds)

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

Rakesh Agrawal Vs. B. S. Jaggi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... that - if the complaint is allowed to proceed only against the 'editor' whose name is printed in the newspaper against whom there is a statutory presumption under section 7 of the act, and in case such 'editor' succeeds in proving that he was not the 'editor' having control over the selection of the alleged libellous matter published in the ..... publication of any newspaper, each copy of the publication shall contain the names of the owner and the editor who have printed and published that newspaper. under section 7 of the act, there is a presumption that the editor whose name is printed in the newspaper as editor shall be held to be the editor in any civil or ..... for the editor of every portion of that issue of the newspaper of which a copy is produced.8. definitions of editor and newspaper have been given in section 1(1) of the act as under :- editor . means the person who controls the selection of the matter that is published in a newspaper. . newspaper . means any printed periodical work .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2012 (HC)

Anurudh Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... or any special form of procedure prescribed, by any other law for the time being in force. (emphasis supplied) ::4. :: (m.cr.c.no.3213/2012) under section 5 of the act (as applicable to the state of m.p.).officers authorized to issue search warrant are district magistrate or any other officer invested with the full powers of a magistrate ..... some way or the other, deriving profit from the use of instruments of gaming kept in the house. obviously, profit is the essence of the offence, under section 4 of the act. in the words of batty, j. the mischief aimed at is the practice of individuals making a profit by providing a spot of their own selection known as ..... chandra agrawal 4. preetam singh, 1230/- 1200/- 2430/- son of swayambhar singh total 4230/- 4200/- 8430/- learned senior counsel has strenuously contended that the offence, under section 4 of the act, was not made out as there was not even an iota of evidence to show that the shop was being used as a common gaming house. according to him .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 2012 (HC)

Makhmal Khan and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... by the judgment dated 11/10/2002 passed by the second sessions judge, sehore in st no.136/2002, whereby the appellants were convicted for commission of offence punishable under section 376(2)(g) of ipc and sentenced for ten years' rigorous imprisonment with fine of rs.2000/-. in default of payment of fine amount, an additional ri for six ..... to insult her. it is not a case where the prosecutrix or her husband was in possession of some property of the appellants, and therefore to pressurize her such an act was committed with her. the prosecutrix did not allege any enmity between herself or her husband with the appellants. she was suggested that her daughter hasina left her house ..... conduct of the prosecutrix appears to be unnatural as depicted by herself. she had alleged that gang rape done by three persons in turn by turn, but for such an act at least time of 30 minutes must have been spent. according to the prosecutrix, her brother-in-law bablu (pw-7) came to the spot after hearing hue and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2012 (HC)

Jaggu Korku Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... to 33 her home with ashok vishwakarma on his motorcycle. inspector swarnjeet singh dhami (pw-23) proved the statement of dolly ladiya (ex.p/1) recorded under section 27 of the evidence act. he also stated that he verified the fact that accused ashok vishwakarma had taken dolly to her house from bhedaghat. learned counsel of ashok vishwakarma submitted that by ..... back home from bhedaghat by auto, but this fact was found missing in her statement (ex.p/1) recorded by police by way of disclosure memo under section 27 of the evidence act. similarly, the fact that accused rahul rajak told to her that he will obtain rs.80 lacs from the parents of deceased was also not mentioned by ..... dead body at the instance of accused was proved not it was mentioned in the inquest report as to how the body was recovered and no panchnama under section 27 of the evidence act of the recovery of the body was made, accused 19 was entitled to acquittal on benefit of doubt.41. in the present case, before the information .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2012 (HC)

Durga Prasad Kewat Vs. the Chief Mechanical Engineer

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... 10 exceptin g in a case of malafides or perversity i.e., where there is no evidence to support a finding or where a finding is such that no man acting reasonably and with objec tivity could have arrived at that findings. the court cannot embark upon reappreciating the evidence or weighing the same like an appellate authority . so ..... m.that between 4-5 a.m.on 07-05-2006 on an inspection being carried out the petitioner was found sleeping in coach no.07404 slrwc. the said act on the part of the petitioner led to issuance of a charge-sheet/show cause notice dated 09-05-2006 under rule 11 of the railway w.p.no. ..... not applica ble to departmental enquiry proceedin gs. the only requirement of law is that the allegation against the delinquent officer must be established by such evidence acting upon which a reasonable person acting reasonably and with objec tivity may arrive at a finding upholding the gravamen of the charge against the delinquent officer . mere conjecture or surmises cannot sustain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2012 (HC)

Rajesh Gupta Vs. Smt. Urvashi Marwaha

Court : Madhya Pradesh

1 W.P. No. 6548/2012 HIGHCOURTOFMADHYAPRADEESHJABALPUR (WritPetitionNo.6548/2012) RajeshGupta Vs. Smt.UrvashiMarwahaandanother PRESENT:HONBLESHRIJUSTICESANJAYYADAV CounselforPetitioner ShriAshokKumarJain,Advocate Counselforrespondents ShriSiddharthGulati,Advocate ORDER (19/6/2012) PERSANJAYYADAV,J The respondent No. 1 is a proprietor of a Saw Mill, named and styled as Durga Trading Company situated over plot No. 1099/1100, NarsinghWard,MadanMahal,VillageAmanpur,Jabalpur,BandobastNo. 5,PatwariCircleNo.28KhasraNo.90/1.InthesaidpremisesthreeSaw Machines,ofwhichonebelongtorespondentNo.1andtwobelongto respondentNo.2arebeingoperatedonthestrengthofthelicenceissued by the Forest Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, under the provisionsoftheMadhyaPradeshKashthaChiran(Viniyaman)1984and the Rules made thereunder, viz., The M.P. Kashtha Chiran(Viniyaman) Niyam,1984.2. ThepetitionerisaproprietorofM/s.ShriRamKashthaUdyogand dealsinthebusinessofpurchaseandsaleoft...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2012 (HC)

Moil Jan Shakti Majdoor Sangh Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... automatic cessation of a representative union in the code of discipline. reliance is placed on clause 12 and 13 of code of discipline and section 16 of bombay industrial relations act 1946 to bring home the submissions that there is no automatic cessation of status as representative union even after expiry of two years. 25. ..... subscription paid, the months for which it was paid, etc. the verification officer will maintain a list of members personally interrogated, giving their ticket numbers, name of section where working, the result of personal interrogation, etc. (8) where the sample check reveals that certain members interrogated deny membership of union, its list of members ..... bombay and others : (1990) 2 scc 444: 7. it is further a common knowledge that although since long there was a strong demand from some sections for recog- nising the bargaining agent of the workmen by a ballot secret or otherwise, the national labour commission did not countenance it for certain obvious reasons. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2012 (HC)

Moil Janshakti Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... no automatic cessation of a representative union in the code of discipline. reliance is placed on clause 12 and 13 of code of discipline and section 16 of bombay industrial relations act 1946 to bring home the submissions that there is no automatic cessation of status as representative union even after expiry of two years. 25- ..... workers, bombay and others : (1990) 2 scc 444. 7. it is further a common knowledge that although since long there was a strong demand from some sections for recog- nising the bargaining agent of the workmen by a ballot secret or otherwise, the national labour commission did not countenance it for certain obvious reasons. it ..... importance in the industrial relations. the collective bargaining comes from being represented through unions, the formation whereof is under the statute, e.g. the trade union act, 1936. the formation of union in itself is not sufficient to bridge the gap between the management and the workman unless the union is recognized as representing .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2012 (HC)

Thakat Singh and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2573

..... exercise. hence, before considering the rival contentions of the parties, it would be profitable to set out the material provisions of the juvenile justice (care and protection) act 2000. section 7-a. procedure to be followed when claim of juvenile is raised before any court.- (1) whenever a claim of juvenility is raised before any court or ..... given to such juvenile or the person concerned. (5) save and except where ,further inquiry or otherwise is required inter alia in terms of section 7-a, section 64 of the act and these rules, no further inquiry shall be conducted by the court or the board after examining and obtaining the certificate or other documentary proof referred ..... before the court is juvenile, it shall forward the juvenile or the child alongwith the record of the proceeding to the board having jurisdiction under the act for making an inquiry under section 49 of the act. (10) in the case of jitendra ram alias jitu vs. state of jharkhand (air 2006 sc 1933), the apex court held:- we .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2012 (HC)

M/S. Technical Associates Limited Vs. the Assistant Labour Commissione ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... undertake the social security schemes and welfare measures. the parliament has, therefore, enacted the building and other construction workers welfare cess act, 1996 (in short, the cess act). section 14 of this act empowers the central government to make rules by notification in the official gazette for carrying out its provisions. in exercise of the ..... deals with levy of cess and it reads as under: 3. levy of cess. for the purpose of levy of cess under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act, cost of construction shall include all expenditure incurred by an employer in connection with the building or other construction work but shall not include- ..... building and other construction workers and to provide for their safety, health and welfare measures and for other matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 18 of this act mandates every state government to constitute a welfare board so as to provide and monitor social security, schemes and welfare measures for the benefit .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //