Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Page 85 of about 6,356 results (0.610 seconds)

Nov 25 2014 (HC)

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court : Kerala

..... its report was withheld. the supreme court in sampat tatyada shinde v. state of maharashtra (air1974sc791 held thus: "the evidence of test identification is admissible under section 9. it is at best supporting evidence. it can be used only to corroborate the substantive evidence given by the witnesses in court regarding identification of the ..... accused as the doer of the criminal act. the earlier identification made by the witnesses at the test identification parade, by itself, has no independent value. nor is test identification the only type of ..... not suffer from any infirmity, that circumstance lends corroboration to the evidence given by the witness before court. the test identification parade is not a magisterial act. it is only the part of the investigation. the purpose of the identification parade is to test the veracity of the witness who tries to identify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2014 (HC)

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court : Kerala

..... its report was withheld. the supreme court in sampat tatyada shinde v. state of maharashtra (air1974sc791 held thus: "the evidence of test identification is admissible under section 9. it is at best supporting evidence. it can be used only to corroborate the substantive evidence given by the witnesses in court regarding identification of the ..... accused as the doer of the criminal act. the earlier identification made by the witnesses at the test identification parade, by itself, has no independent value. nor is test identification the only type of ..... not suffer from any infirmity, that circumstance lends corroboration to the evidence given by the witness before court. the test identification parade is not a magisterial act. it is only the part of the investigation. the purpose of the identification parade is to test the veracity of the witness who tries to identify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2014 (HC)

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court : Kerala

..... its report was withheld. the supreme court in sampat tatyada shinde v. state of maharashtra (air1974sc791 held thus: "the evidence of test identification is admissible under section 9. it is at best supporting evidence. it can be used only to corroborate the substantive evidence given by the witnesses in court regarding identification of the ..... accused as the doer of the criminal act. the earlier identification made by the witnesses at the test identification parade, by itself, has no independent value. nor is test identification the only type of ..... not suffer from any infirmity, that circumstance lends corroboration to the evidence given by the witness before court. the test identification parade is not a magisterial act. it is only the part of the investigation. the purpose of the identification parade is to test the veracity of the witness who tries to identify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2014 (HC)

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court : Kerala

..... its report was withheld. the supreme court in sampat tatyada shinde v. state of maharashtra (air1974sc791 held thus: "the evidence of test identification is admissible under section 9. it is at best supporting evidence. it can be used only to corroborate the substantive evidence given by the witnesses in court regarding identification of the ..... accused as the doer of the criminal act. the earlier identification made by the witnesses at the test identification parade, by itself, has no independent value. nor is test identification the only type of ..... not suffer from any infirmity, that circumstance lends corroboration to the evidence given by the witness before court. the test identification parade is not a magisterial act. it is only the part of the investigation. the purpose of the identification parade is to test the veracity of the witness who tries to identify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2014 (HC)

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court : Kerala

..... its report was withheld. the supreme court in sampat tatyada shinde v. state of maharashtra (air1974sc791 held thus: "the evidence of test identification is admissible under section 9. it is at best supporting evidence. it can be used only to corroborate the substantive evidence given by the witnesses in court regarding identification of the ..... accused as the doer of the criminal act. the earlier identification made by the witnesses at the test identification parade, by itself, has no independent value. nor is test identification the only type of ..... not suffer from any infirmity, that circumstance lends corroboration to the evidence given by the witness before court. the test identification parade is not a magisterial act. it is only the part of the investigation. the purpose of the identification parade is to test the veracity of the witness who tries to identify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2014 (HC)

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court : Kerala

..... its report was withheld. the supreme court in sampat tatyada shinde v. state of maharashtra (air1974sc791 held thus: "the evidence of test identification is admissible under section 9. it is at best supporting evidence. it can be used only to corroborate the substantive evidence given by the witnesses in court regarding identification of the ..... accused as the doer of the criminal act. the earlier identification made by the witnesses at the test identification parade, by itself, has no independent value. nor is test identification the only type of ..... not suffer from any infirmity, that circumstance lends corroboration to the evidence given by the witness before court. the test identification parade is not a magisterial act. it is only the part of the investigation. the purpose of the identification parade is to test the veracity of the witness who tries to identify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2014 (HC)

Althaf Vs. Station House officer,manjershwar Police

Court : Kerala

..... its report was withheld. the supreme court in sampat tatyada shinde v. state of maharashtra (air1974sc791 held thus: "the evidence of test identification is admissible under section 9. it is at best supporting evidence. it can be used only to corroborate the substantive evidence given by the witnesses in court regarding identification of the ..... accused as the doer of the criminal act. the earlier identification made by the witnesses at the test identification parade, by itself, has no independent value. nor is test identification the only type of ..... not suffer from any infirmity, that circumstance lends corroboration to the evidence given by the witness before court. the test identification parade is not a magisterial act. it is only the part of the investigation. the purpose of the identification parade is to test the veracity of the witness who tries to identify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2014 (HC)

K.K.Viswanathan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... to be considered by the c.r.p. nos. 337 of 2010 & 265 of 2011 7 taluk land board. the same shall be done in the touchstone of section 81 of the act in regard to the grant of exemption from ceiling provisions.10. the taluk land board, thirurangadi will consider the points focused above and pass final orders within a period ..... .27 acres to 24.97 acres. added to c.r.p. nos. 337 of 2010 & 265 of 2011 6 this is the fact that exemption was granted under section 81 of the act in regard to house sites and other structures bringing down the total extent of land. this aspect of the matter has also to be considered by the taluk land ..... document no. 1884/82. another extent of 44 cents in r.s. no. 167/18 was sold by the wife of the declarant to kodakkattakath yakoob under document no. 1304/1996. it is the contention of the legal heirs of the declarant that the above total extent of 1 acre is liable to be excluded under section 7e of the act. the taluk .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2014 (HC)

M.G. Prabhakara Panicker Vs. M.S.S. Rao

Court : Kerala

..... in state of w.b and others v. kartick chandra das and others [(1996) 5 scc342 to contend that the period of limitation prescribed under section 5 of the limitation act applies and the delay can be condoned. he also referred to the judgment of the supreme court in pallav sheth v.custodian and others [(2001) 7 ..... this contempt petition is filed on 11/04/2014, which according to the learned counsel, is beyond the period of limitation prescribed under the contempt of courts act, 1971. it is also argued that this court in the writ appeal had directed the respondent to consider the claim more meticulously with respect to the relevant facts ..... to the post of sub divisional engineer in the year 1996 by invoking the provisions of persons with physical disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995. he also claimed to have completed the qualifying service for promotion to the said post. according to the petitioner, for the post of sub divisional engineer, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2014 (HC)

Raghu Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... show that anybody other than the complainant and the accused persons had heard the alleged words.4. it is well settled that to attract a prosecution under section 3(1)(x) of the sc/st act the accused must have used the abusive or insulting words or humiliating words against a member of scheduled caste or scheduled tribe, with the object of ..... , i find that the prosecution in this case does not have a definite case against the petitioners herein. whether it is under section 294(b) of the indian penal code or under section 3(1)(x) of the sc/st act, what is alleged by the police against these petitioners is quite unsustainable under the law. thus the whole prosecution as against them ..... (b) ipc is liable to be quashed.3. now let us come to the other offence under the sc/st act. here also it is well settled that for a prosecution under section 3(1)(x) of the sc/st act, the alleged offence must have been committed in public view. of course such an offence can be committed even in a private .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //