Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Year: 2003 Page 11 of about 300 results (0.071 seconds)

Tata Consultancy Services Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR674

..... in favour of karnataka infrastructural development and finance corporation and that it is a duty which is levied in addition to the normal duty leviable under section 3 of the act. section 3-b of the act reads as under:-'3b. certain instruments chargeable with additional duty:- (1) any instrument of conveyance, exchange, settlement, gift or lease in perpetuity ..... that the notification in itself does not expressly extend the benefit of exemption upto 50% in respect of any levy of additional stamp duty levied under section 3-b of the act; that in the absence of any such express wordings in the notification, the petitioner cannot claim such benefit on the levy of additional stamp duty; ..... the statute, as the only question that arises for determination is dependent on the interpretation of the notification and in the light of the provisions of section 9 of the act, matter is taken up for consideration even under article 226 of the constitution of india.5. rule is issued in the matter.6. a common .....

G.P. Srinivas Vs. K. Halappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(6)KarLJ347

..... pointed out how the votes polled by a disqualified candidate in a multi-cornered contest have to be treated for purpose of issuing directions under section 101 of the representation of peoples act, in the following terms: 'this is not to say that where there are more than two candidates in the field for a single seat ..... and submissions made at the bar, i proceed to decide the issues arising for consideration in these petitions. the term 'backward classes' is defined under section 2(2) of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993 as: ''backward classes' means such class or classes of citizens as may be classified as categories 'a' and 'b' and notified ..... dated 20-4-2000. reservations were made for certain classes under the provisions of the karnataka panchayat raj act (for short 'the act') by notification issued in that regard on 13-1-1995 under section 2(2) of the act specifying the castes/communities coming under backward class a/b groups. namadhari caste is brought under backward class .....

P.E. Kalaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi), by Its Secretary and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3643

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Petitioner was an applicant for Indane L.P.G. Distributorship at Kutta Rural Location in response to a Newspaper advertisement dated 16.7.2000 issued by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., the third respondent herein. Petitioner had applied for award of distributorship claiming to be an outstanding sports person as mentioned and described in this advertisement, a copy of which is produced as Annexure-A to the petition, inasmuch as the Distributorship was exclusively reserved to the category of outstanding sports persons.2. The advertisement had elicited response from about four persons including the petitioner. It appears that One amongst them did not turn up for the interview and only three candidates remained in the fray. The Dealer Selection Board interviewed the three candidates on 22.1.2001 and listed them in the order of merit. The result of the selection was also announced on the same day. As per this list, the fourth respondent figured as No. 1, the...

S. Jogindar Singh Sabarwal Vs. the Karnataka Power Transmission Corpor ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2004Kant141; ILR2003KAR4284

..... with a view to safeguard the interest of cinema viewing public; that it was an hindrance for their movement and a source of danger, that the authorities have acted only after taking note of this possibility with a view to safeguard the interest of the general public; that necessary charges have been paid in this regard and the ..... breach of law, say by taking into account bona fide, and with best of intentions, some extraneous matters or by ignoring relevant matters. that would render the impugned act or order ultra vires. it would be a case of fraud on powers. the misuse in bad faith arises when the power is exercise for an improper motive, say ..... location namely the theatre premises to the present premises of the petitioner smacks of malafides and biased action in favour of the fifth respondent; that it is purely an act of favouritism in favour of the fifth respondent; that the authorities have grossly misused the powers vested in them under the provisions of the regulations to effect such .....

Sadashivaiah and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR5088

..... of judicial determination by competent authority deciding the valuable rights of the parties. however, the same meaning cannot be attributed to an award passed under the act. under the act, under section 11 the collector is called upon to hold an enquiry and enquire into the objections, (if any), which any person interested has stated pursuant to a ..... a nil award. in the aforesaid judgment the question for consideration was the compensation payable in respect of the damage suffered by the owner under section 48(2) of the act. the aforesaid section provides that whenever the government withdraws from such acquisition, the collector shall determine the amount of compensation due for the damage suffered by the ..... ghose v. the secretary of state for india, ilr vol xlvi cal, series 861 where it has been held as the award is not defined in the act but from sections 11, 26, 27, 30, 31 and 32 it seems decision which does not decide in some form or the other the question of compensation, is not .....

B. Krishnamoorthy Beliya Vs. Syndicate Bank

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(5)KarLJ453; (2004)IILLJ75Kant

..... bank proving difficult of recovery. the foil/more details of the above are furnished in the statement of imputation of misconduct on your part appended here below.by your above acts you failed to discharge your duties with utmost integrity and honesty and exhibited conduct unbecoming of the status of the bank officer and thereby contravened regulation 3(1) read with .....

Saraswathi Bai and ors. Vs. Regional Director, E.S.i. Corporation and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC730

..... adopted by the employees' insurance court while examining the questions that arose for consideration was erroneous. the court below appears to have remained oblivious of section 51-a of the act which raises a presumption in favour of the claimants that the death was because of an accident arising out of the employment of the deceased employee ..... the furnace and not by jumping inside the furnace.9. the above depositions of the witnesses do not in our opinion rebut the presumption under section 51-a of the act. insofar as rw 1 gopal gunderao kulkarni is concerned, he has in no uncertain terms denied having seen the deceased committing suicide by jumping into ..... the appellants for the said benefits proceeded on the premise that the untimely demise of the deceased employee was an 'employment injury' within the meaning of section 2(8) of the act entitling the dependants to the relief prayed for by them. the expression 'employment injury' has been defined by the said provision as under:(8) ' .....

Smt. Yashoda Bai Vs. Smt. Lakshmamma

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR3871

..... be entitled to receive the rent, if the premises were let to a tenant.' the relief sought by the respondent in the present case is under section 27(2) (r) of the act and section 27 speaks in terms of a petition presented by a landlord and landlord is defined in a very broad sense and it includes a person who ..... landlord could terminate the tenancy and institute the suit for eviction. the tenant in such a suit is estopped from questioning the title of the landlord under section 116 of the evidence act. the tenant cannot deny that the landlord had title to the premises at the commencement of the tenancy. under the general law in a suit between landlord ..... if eviction is ordered. the court-below considered relative merits of the contentions urged by both sides, passed an order allowing the eviction petition under clause (h) of section 21(1) of the act. being aggrieved, the petitioner-tenant has come up in this revision. 3. i have heard the learned counsel on both sides.4. mr. v.b.shivakumar, .....

Widia (India) Limited and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... , challenge is confined to the notification dated 23rd september, 1998, which was issued by the state government in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act providing that w.e.f. ist day of april, 1994 and up to 6th day of january, 1998 tax shall be levied and collected on ..... at the conclusion that the notifications were discriminatory for the reasons recorded therein and it was also held that the authority exceeded its powers conferred under section 3(1) of the act and, therefore, the said notifications were ultra vires.9. the said judgment and order was challenged before this court and the court finally passed ..... 7. several assessee filed writ petitions challenging the said notification. pending writ petitions, government of karnataka in exercise of its power under section 3(1) of the act read with section 21 of the mysore general clauses act, 1899, by issuing notification no. fd-109-cet-97(8) dated 31st march, 1997, amended the notification dated march, 30, .....

Bhimavva and ors. Vs. Shankar Alias Adya and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2004)IILLJ235Kant

..... it should be as per contractual liability and for that the insured has to pay additional premium.17. a plain reading of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 147 of the act states that an insurer is not compulsorily required to cover the risk of all employees of the insured but is only required to cover the risk in ..... it. the liability could be statutory or contractual. a statutory liability cannot be more than what is required by the statute itself. however, there is nothing in section 95 of the act prohibiting the parties from contracting to create unlimited or higher liability to cover wider risk. in such an event, the insurer is bound by the terms of the ..... said decision was based upon the relevant clause in the insurance policy in that case which restricted the legal liability of the insurer to the statutory requirement under section 95 of the act. as such, that decision had no bearing on amrit lal sood's case as the terms of the policy were wide enough to cover a gratuitous occupant .....