Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Year: 1989 Page 17 of about 224 results (0.370 seconds)

Smt. Dropadi Devi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi87

..... which had been requisitioned. the jurisdiction to decide the amount of compensation payable, and the authorities in whom that jurisdiction is vested, is provided by the 1952 act. section 19 expressly bars the jurisdiction of the civil court, including the high court, to adjudicate in respect of any matter which a competent authority or an arbitrator is ..... apply accordingly. the result of this is that the rights and obligations with regard to the property which was requisitioned will be regulated under the 1952 act. 92. section 8 of the act lays down the principles and the method for determining compensation payable in respect of property which is requisitioned. s. 9 provides for payment of compensation ..... s. kacker showed that the original of this command dt.1-2-40 was with the union of india. this.document was not produced. under section 65 of the evidence act if it is shown that the original of a document is in the possession or power of a person against whom the document is sought to .....

Mohd. Saleem Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (No. I)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1989(24)ECC210

..... detention passed by the particular officer, to the said officer himself. examining the constitutional mandate given under article 22(5) of the constitution and provisions of section 11 of cofeposa act, the court reached the conclusion that the detenu has a right to make a representation only to the appropriate government and not to the officer who may ..... or revoke his own order. the supreme court in the case of sushila mafatlal (supra) in para. 18 while making reference to the provisions of section 11 of the cofeposa act still gave a finding that the officer who passes the detention order has no power to revoke its own order. this ratio laid down is in direct ..... passed the detention order. however, there is nothing illegal or wrong if the officer, who has passed the detention order and who is empowered under section 21 of the general clauses act to revoke his own order to invite a representation to himself also for reconsidering the matter on some material which may be disclosed by the detenu .....

institute of Marketing Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (1990)32ITD616(Delhi)

..... commission paid to miss molijit singh and miss erajit singh, daughters of dr.jagjit singh for services rendered to the society were also disallowable under the provisions of section 13 of the act.12. the cit(a) in the first appeal vide his order dated 24-3-1988 though agreed with the conclusion arrived at by the iac(a),namely, ..... the cit(a) that, (a) the activities carried on by the assessee trust were business activities yielding profits and gains within the meaning of the provisions of section 11 (4a) of the act and that consequently a sum of rs. 13,46,203 was income chargeable to tax, rejecting the assessee's claim that it was not carrying on any activity ..... contention in ground no. 1 is that the learned cit(a) erred in holding that the assessee was not entitled to total exemption under the provision of section 11 of the income-tax act, 1961 in respect of its total income derived during the accounting period ending 30-9-1983. the alternative contentions are that it has been wrongly held .....

Usha Rectifier Corpn. (i.) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assitant Commissio ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1989]30ITD1(Delhi); (1989)34TTJ(Del)209

..... was made due to looses though it appears that the assessed could have asked for determination of the deficiency to be carried forward in terms of sub-section (3) of section 80j of the act. the claim for the assessment year under appeal is, thereforee, being considered for the first time. in making this claim, the assessed has taken the ..... the cit (a) is unjustified.for this reliance was placed on the following judgments :-1. bishamber dayal badri prasad v. iac [1986] 18 itd 279 (delhi) (tm);2. indian explosives ltd. v. cit : [1984]147itr392(cal) .reliance was also placed upon the judgment of the honorable supreme court in the case of madhav prasad jatia v. cit : [1979] ..... had shown total expenditure of rs. 46,606 the assessing officer added back rs. 41606 after allowing allowing deduction of rs. 5,000 in terms of section 37(2a) of the act. there were some other decisions and conclusions arrived at by the assessing officer in completing the assessment on 8-3-1985 but we are not concerned with .....

Kailash Chand Vs. Ganpat Rai

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 39(1989)DLT120; 1989(17)DRJ14; 1989RLR274

..... was repelled by their lordships of the supreme court by holding that there was enough guidance to the competent authority in the use of his discretion under section 19(1) of the act, and that it would fulfill the purpose which the law seeks to achieve viz. the orderly elimination of slums with interim protection for the slum ..... the dicta of the division bench and hold that inter se between the parties at least in view of the observations of the high court, provisions of section 19 of the act are not attracted. learned trial court was in the wrong in observing that the appellant went to the competent authority (slum) claiming himself to be a ..... the court of the rent controller, there is no purpose of harassing the applicant in the court of the competent authority. obviously, the present proceedings under section 19 of the act are infructuous and are not maintainable under law. the learned competent authority has erred in not considering the fact that the premises in dispute under the present .....

Ashok @ Billoo and anr. Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT173

..... sentence is set aside and he is acquitted of all the charges. the appeal no 42/86 of ashok and prem singh is dismissed and their conviction and sentence under sec. 302/34 indian penal code is confirmed. they are. however, acquitted of the charge u/s. 323/34 indian penal code and their conviction and sentence on ..... to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. they have also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months under section 323/34 ipc. sat pal appellant was also convicted u/s 27 of the indian arms act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. all the sentences have been made concurrent. the appellants have made a ..... in criminal appeal no. 27 of 1986 ashok and prem singh appellants in criminal appeal no. 42/1986 have been convicted under section 302/34, section 323/34, indian penal code, and sentenced to imprisonment for life under section 302/34 indian penal code and to the payment of fine of rs. 500.00 each, in default of which they .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Girivanvasi Pragati Mandal

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... excluded except the provisions contained in the non obstante clause.thus, the non obstante clause will exclude the operation and applicability of every other provision in the act or the section, as the case may be, other than those that are provided for in the non obstante clause because the purpose of a non obstante clause is ..... account of the reason mentioned by the learned income-tax officer for imposing such penalty and also by keeping in view the provision of sub-section (3)(a) of section 271 of the act. since the facts did not admit of any further interpretation or conclusion, the setting aside of the issue to the learned appellate assistant commissioner ..... by the assessee and the learned appellate assistant commissioner mentioning that the learned income-tax officer was not justified in imposing the penalty and making mention of section 271 of the act, cancelled the penalty, observing that no penalty for late filing of the return could be imposed in such a case.17. the issue was brought .....

Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1989)(22)ECC71

..... reached by him to the effect that the appeal is maintainable, i would set out the following reasons.10. we are not concerned here with section 35b (1)(a) of the act which speaks of a decision or order passed by the collector of central excise as an adjudicating authority. we are concerned here with an order passed ..... decision. the term is often used in insolvency proceedings to denote an order by which a debtor is declared an insolvent. see section 7 of the provincial insolvency act, 1920 and section 10 of the presidency-town insolvency act, 1909. the collector may adjudicate proper duty payable on an instrument on application by any party see secs. 31 & 32. ..... satisfy that the appeal is maintainable and to this shri sridharan, the learned advocate stated that the appeal is maintainable. he has referred to section 35 of the central excises and salt act, 1944 and states that the appeal is maintainable in respect of any decision or order passed by the central excise officer lower in rank than .....

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Ganesh Tobacco Co.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1991)(31)ECC68

..... gross weight of the package including the weight of the gunny packs, etc. he pleaded since the value is not defined in the notification in terms of section 20 of the general clauses act, the value as given in the statutes should be taken as the value for the purpose of the notification. he pleaded that the value including the cost ..... over the net weight would be relevant." "i have considered the matter. the law on the point relating interpretation of the expression "assessable value" under section 4 of the central excises and salt act, 1944 has been duly settled by the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the writ appeal filed by the union of india and ors. against ..... in this order are as under : "i have considered the matter. the law on the point relating to interpretation of the expression 'assessable value' under section 4 of the central excises and salt act, 1944 has been duly settled by the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the writ appeal filed by the union of india and ors. .....

Ved Pal Anand Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1989Delhi264

..... above.(69) as far as documents are concerned, mr. rawal submitted that his client madan lal anand had retracted from his earlier statement made under section 108 of the customs act. the retraction statement dated the 20th june, 1988 according to him, was not placed before the detaining authority. he further submitted that a letter dated ..... possibly divine that such an order was going to be passed. mr. rawal then submitted that atleast the specially empowered officer who made the declaration under section 9 of the act should have kept that in view. at any rate, he urged that at the time of confirming the detention order, the central government ought to ..... filament yarn/ fibre was allowed and consequently made the polyester filament yarn/fiber imported duty tree liable to confiscation in terms of clause (o) of section 111 of the customs act, 1962. the manner in which the polyester filament yarn/fiber was decaled duty free and its sale into india without fulfillling the export obligations in .....