Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 20 of about 19,101 results (0.117 seconds)

Feb 11 2013 (HC)

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd Vs. Delhi International Airport Pvt L ...

Court : Delhi

..... no.2, dgca is not a competent authority to assess the danger of fuel storage within the apron area and rather it is the authority under the explosives act, which is competent and authorized to analyze the safety aspects with regard to the existence of the atf facility within the apron area.38. counsel for ..... the defendant no. 1 raised various factual and legal objections in its written statement. it referred to some of the provisions of the aircraft act, 1934, namely section 4 of the aircraft act, 1934 which enables the central government to make rules to implement the convention relating to international civil aviation signed at chicago on december 7 ..... of the matters specified in clauses (aa), (b), (c), (e), (f), (g), (ga), (gb), (gc), (h), (i), (m) and (qq) of sub-section (2) of section 5, to any person or persons using any aerodrome or engaged in the aircraft operations, air traffic control, maintenance and operation of aerodrome, communication, navigation, surveillance and air traffic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 2013 (HC)

Weider Publications, Llc and anr. Vs. Shri Pushpendra Srivastav and an ...

Court : Delhi

..... the two magazines, inter alia, being pictures of man weight-lifting have been scanned from plaintiff's magazine and published in defendant's magazine including printed matter "explosive growth", "high pull", "jump shrug", etc. photograph of ronnie coleman being felicitated with raised hands have been plagiarized from the plaintiff's magazine and published in ..... by authors of member countries and originate from and are first published in the said member countries. the plaintiffs' works are, thus, protected in india under section 40 of the copyright act, 1957 read with the international copyright order, 1999. (iv) the plaintiff no. i is the owner of the copyright in its magazine muscle & ..... fitness are "works" that have been first published in the usa and are also registered in the usa. under the us copyright law, us code title 17, section 201(b) the copyright in a work created by an employee or an author who has been remunerated, belongs to the employer. the articles published in the magazine .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2012 (TRI)

Chet Ram Meena Vs. Commissioner of Police and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... suitability of the respondent and considering the charge against the respondent and disposal of the cases as compromised with admonition and benefit under section 3 of the probation of offenders act concluded the respondent to be habitual of picking up quarrels and resorting to violence and his such attitude rendering him unsuitable. it ..... that anti-social maladies are mostly the result of social imbalances. it must be remembered that on the one hand, social stresses, for various reasons, explosively mount in the real worlds hard environs and the harsh remedy of heartless incarceration and ouster from society deepens the criminality. the swing of the pendulum ..... of the respondent and considering the charge against the respondent and disposal of the cases as compromised with admonition and benefit under section 3 of the probation of offenders act concluded the respondent to be habitual of picking up quarrels and resorting to violence and his such attitude rendering him unsuitable. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2012 (HC)

M/S Bhagwan Dass Khanna Jewellers Vs. Bhagwan Das Khanna Jewellers Pvt ...

Court : Delhi

..... of place to mention that different acts like drugs and cosmetics act, 1940, food adulteration act, trade and merchandise marks act, copyright act, designs act etc. have made numerous provisions to protect the consumers. but as is bound to happen in impending legislative explosion following globalisation and numerous existing acts, different authorities act differently. such an approach is ..... two independent rights of action against the defendant who may be using the corporate name of a previously incorporated company, one under section 22 of the companies act and the other for injunction restraining the defendant from using the corporate name of the plaintiff or from using a name bearing close ..... the goodwill shall be taken into consideration while arriving at the share of the profits of the partners of the firm. the said section 55 when read with section 37 would further reveal that the while settling the accounts of the outgoing partner, if the agreement between the partner allows so, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2012 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S. Ganapati Finance Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... the manufacture of such cylinders are strictly controlled and regulated, having regard to the safety aspects etc. the ao has referred to the relevant regulations (under the explosives act and gas cylinders rules) which stipulate that a manufacturer of lpg cylinders cannot manufacture the cylinders unless an order has been placed on it by a person who ..... coram: mr. justice s. ravindra bhat mr. justice r.v. easwar r.v. easwar, j.: this is an appeal by the cit under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 and the following substantial questions of law were framed on 30.7.2007:1. whether the incometax appellate tribunal was correct in law in allowing ..... took note of irrelevant material in reaching those findings. if these considerations are not present, it would not be proper for the court in an appeal under section 260a which can be granted only on a substantial question of law, to disturb the findings of fact, particularly when two appellate authorities have reached concurrent findings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2012 (HC)

National Investigation Agency Vs. Wasim Akram Mallik

Court : Delhi

..... (1) of potawith intent to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india or to strike terror in the people or any section of the people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or by any other substances (whether ..... . judge by the same impugned order, the learned additional sessions has directed framing of charges under sections 120b/440/436/302/307/325/323 ipc and section 4 of explosive substance act, 1908 and sections 16, 18, 20, 38, 39 of unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967. the respondent has not preferred an appeal against the impugned order, framing the aforesaid charges and, therefore, framing of charges .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2012 (HC)

Javed Ahmed Khan @ Chhota Javed Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... four appellants before this court and acquitted a-4, a-7, a-8 and a-10 of the charges. a-1 and a-2 were convicted under sections 5 and 7 of explosive act and were sentenced to undergo 7 years imprisonment.9. two accused farooq ahmed khan a-1 and farida dar a-2 did not appeal against their conviction ..... does not involve the present appellants, in any manner; the said accused have not appealed to this court, in respect of the conviction under the explosives act; they were acquitted of the charges under section 120-b ipc; the state has not appealed against that decision.112. pw-105 acp pp singh deposed that investigation of this case was transferred to ..... had proved the complete chain of circumstances, that is to say: (1) even though a-1 and a-2 were acquitted of the charges under section 302, yet they were convicted under the explosives act. the state submits that despite this, the court should consider the evidence as a whole, despite acquittal of some accused by the trial court. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2012 (HC)

State Vs. Mohd. Naushad and ors

Court : Delhi

..... four appellants before this court and acquitted a-4, a-7, a-8 and a-10 of the charges. a-1 and a-2 were convicted under sections 5 and 7 of explosive act and were sentenced to undergo 7 years imprisonment.9. two accused farooq ahmed khan a-1 and farida dar a-2 did not appeal against their conviction ..... does not involve the present appellants, in any manner; the said accused have not appealed to this court, in respect of the conviction under the explosives act; they were acquitted of the charges under section 120-b ipc; the state has not appealed against that decision.112. pw-105 acp pp singh deposed that investigation of this case was transferred to ..... had proved the complete chain of circumstances, that is to say: (1) even though a-1 and a-2 were acquitted of the charges under section 302, yet they were convicted under the explosives act. the state submits that despite this, the court should consider the evidence as a whole, despite acquittal of some accused by the trial court. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2012 (HC)

Mohd. Naushad Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... four appellants before this court and acquitted a-4, a-7, a-8 and a-10 of the charges. a-1 and a-2 were convicted under sections 5 and 7 of explosive act and were sentenced to undergo 7 years imprisonment.9. two accused farooq ahmed khan a-1 and farida dar a-2 did not appeal against their conviction ..... does not involve the present appellants, in any manner; the said accused have not appealed to this court, in respect of the conviction under the explosives act; they were acquitted of the charges under section 120-b ipc; the state has not appealed against that decision.112. pw-105 acp pp singh deposed that investigation of this case was transferred to ..... had proved the complete chain of circumstances, that is to say: (1) even though a-1 and a-2 were acquitted of the charges under section 302, yet they were convicted under the explosives act. the state submits that despite this, the court should consider the evidence as a whole, despite acquittal of some accused by the trial court. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2012 (HC)

Mirza Nissar HussaIn @ Naza Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

..... four appellants before this court and acquitted a-4, a-7, a-8 and a-10 of the charges. a-1 and a-2 were convicted under sections 5 and 7 of explosive act and were sentenced to undergo 7 years imprisonment.9. two accused farooq ahmed khan a-1 and farida dar a-2 did not appeal against their conviction ..... does not involve the present appellants, in any manner; the said accused have not appealed to this court, in respect of the conviction under the explosives act; they were acquitted of the charges under section 120-b ipc; the state has not appealed against that decision.112. pw-105 acp pp singh deposed that investigation of this case was transferred to ..... had proved the complete chain of circumstances, that is to say: (1) even though a-1 and a-2 were acquitted of the charges under section 302, yet they were convicted under the explosives act. the state submits that despite this, the court should consider the evidence as a whole, despite acquittal of some accused by the trial court. as .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //