Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 11 of about 17,633 results (0.543 seconds)

C.V. Karunakaran Vs. the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009(171)LC254(Madras); 2010(249)ELT324(Mad)

..... export promotion schemes;(n) offences under the act;(o) the provisions of allied acts including the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992 (22 of 1992), the central excise act, 1944 (1 of 1944), foreign exchange management act, 2000 (42 of 1999), the indian explosives act, 1884 (4 of 1884), the arms act, 1959 (54 of 1959), the narcotics ..... of the same, preamble in customs house agents licensing regulations, 2004, is extracted hereunder:in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 146 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and in supersession of the customs house agents licensing regulations, 1984, except as respect things done or ..... the following regulations.23. as stated in paragraph 11 above, these regulations to issue customs house agents licence are framed under section 146(2) of the customs act, 1962. section 159a of the customs act, 1962, also deals with the effect of amendment, etc., on rules, regulations, notifications or orders, which reads as .....

M/S.Tamil Nadu Industrial Explosives Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

..... depot to which the impugned goods have been cleared has been defined as a place of removal for the purpose of valuation under section 4 of the act. under the law, the price prevailing at the depot on the date of removal from the factory has a bearing on the assessable ..... the refund claim from 13.06.1996 to 20.02.1997 was found to be barred by limitation under the provisions of section 11b of the central excise act, 1944 as the claim was filed only on 19.08.1997. hence it was proposed to reject the claim of ..... we have heard both sides. learned counsel for the appellants submits that the relevant date in the present case would be as defined in section 11b(5)(d) as this is a case of reduction of duty by the government and if this date is accepted to be the ..... brief facts of the case are that the assessees (hereinafter referred to as tel), who are manufacturers of explosives and accessories thereof, have depots at various places like kanpur, bilaspur, dehradun etc., and their products are sold .....

Ravi @ Ravi Prakash Vs. the State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4570

..... d-2 police station, chengalpattu, kancheepuram district, for alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 307, 397 and 506(ii) ipc, another offence punishable under section 25(1)(a)(1)(b) of the arms act and offences punishable under sections 3 and 5 of the explosives act. the earlier petition filed before this court for the very same relief ..... a person. but for such an advocate to act on behalf of the petitioner, ..... to that provision in sub-section 1(b), it shall be obvious that a petition for anticipatory bail under section 438 cr.p.c. may be moved only by the person apprehending arrest and not by any other person acting on his behalf.7. the above said observation does not mean that an advocate cannot act on behalf of such .....

N. Sridhar Vs. Maruthi Jayaraman and M.R.F. Ltd. Rep. by Its Secretary

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas100(Mad); (2009)6MLJ35

..... within the scope of his employment with the bank.'19. the learned counsel for the second respondent has referred to section 51, 53 and 108 of the companies act which refers to service of documents on company, service of documents on merits by company, and the transfer not to ..... has been made mention of. based on the ex.a.4, the police have registered a case in x. cr. no. 1917/92 under section 379, 467, 468, 419, 420 r/w 471 and 34 i.p.c. ex.b.16 is the letter of the second respondent ..... march to light a cigarette and threw it on the floor, and there by caused a fire and explosion which did great damage. the masters were held liable because the negligence was in the discharge of the duty by the servant. although ..... arise only when the servant is liable. the second question must be answered by factual determination of the issue whether the employees wrongful act or act of omission or commission committed by him has been done in the course of his employment.25. it is the settled principle of .....

P.R.P. Granites Represented by Its Chief Accounts Officer R. Arumugam ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Mad)371

..... granites in a pattern to facilitate extraction to big blocks more or less in cubical form or about . tonne to one tonne each. the holes are filled with explosives and exploded so as to extract the blocks from the hills. the blocks are then thoroughly washed with water to see whether there is any crack in it. the ..... ramachandran, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner very strenuously contended as follows:that the assessment order has been passed in total disregard to the object of section 10b of the act. the reasons stated in the assessment order are totally in variance with the reasons stated in the show cause notice. the activity of the petitioner has been ..... the reasons stated in the show cause notice dated 30.12.2005. the show cause notice proceeded as if the petitioner was not entitled to deduction under section 10b of the act for the reason that the petitioner unit had formed by splitting up or the reconstruction, of a business already in existence and also formed by the .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pioneer Press P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2009]308ITR154(Mad); [2010]186TAXMAN448(Mad)

..... as chemicals.10. in cit v. south india sugars ltd. : [2001]248itr92(mad) also, the same question was raised and this court, relying on cit v. southern explosives co. : [2000]242itr107(mad) , had observed as follows (headnote):. the amounts collected by the assessee were amounts which were meant to be utilised by the assessee for ..... as against that, the department has filed these appeals.3. the learned senior standing counsel appearing for the revenue submitted that this issue is covered by cit v. southern explosives co. : [2000]242itr107(mad) and there can be no dispute regarding the fact that the receipt was a trading receipt. in sundaram finance ltd. v. deputy ..... state of madras [1954] 5 stc 382 (mad).4. learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that pursuant to the 42nd amendment, section 3b was introduced in the tamil nadu general sales tax act. rules 6a and 6b prescribed the method to determine the taxable turnover hence the assessee was advised to collect 5.4 per cent. on .....

Tmt. Rohini Lingam Vs. State Represented by the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ822

..... , issued by the judicial magistrate-i, nagercoil in kanyakumari police station crime no.408/95 under sections 147, 148, 332, 379, 307 of ipc and in crime no.447/95 under section 56 of the indian explosive substances act and section 25(1)(b) of the indian arms act. he was released on bail in crime no.408/95 by the assistant sessions judge, nagercoil ..... . 27/94 of cbcid 147, 148, 449, 302 ipc 4,5 of indian explosive substances act judicial magistrate ii, nagercoil, no. 19/95 3. 106/87 of anjugramam 147, 170, 457, 386, 395 of ipc police station assistant sessions, nagercoil, sc. no. 72/90 ..... on bail in the said case and taken as remand prisoner for five cases pending against him, which are as follows: sl. no. crime no. & name of police station sections and act under which remanded court and case 1. 10/92 of eraniel police station 341, 302, 109 read with 34 ipc district sessions, nagercoil, s.c. no. 102/95 2 .....

K. Poruthammal, Vs. the Assistant Director, Drugs Control, Zone Iv,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ1151

..... of learned rent controller (district munsif) tambaram, for eviction against the third respondent. the petitioners have also filed a petition under section 11(4) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act,1960 for direction to the third respondent to deposit the rent and that was ordered on 07.11.2001, directing the third ..... the land and he has constructed the superstructure and therefore as a statutory tenant the notice is wholly illegal. the landlord approached the joint chief controller of explosives, chennai to cancel the permission granted to the tenant for storage of petroleum. the tenant has defended it before the authority stating that the no objection ..... in 2004, about which litigation is pending. in such circumstances, the third respondent, after the order of eviction was passed under section 11(4) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960 cannot be said to be a trespasser, especially when it is not in dispute that the third respondent has filed .....

Chitrahar Traders Rep. by Its Partner, R. Krishnamurthi and Neyveli Li ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)14VST439(Mad)

..... collector permitted the use of explosives to break the structures of b&c; plant.9. in the meanwhile, the commercial tax officer [hereinafter referred to as the 'cto'], cuddalore, who is ..... 53 was issued describing the goods as b&c; plant and machineries (iron scrap). subsequently, licence was also obtained from the district revenue officer for use of explosives for blasting the plant and the machineries and the district revenue officer called for remarks from the district superintendent of police and finally on 21.02.2006, the district ..... and transport them as a steel scrap, such sales of scrap was taxable at 4%. thereafter, m/s. chitrahar traders made an application under section 28-a of the tngst act to the first respondent commissioner of commercial taxes and sought for a ruling on the rate of tax payable on the scrap purchased by them.10. .....

Kannika Parameshwari Service Station Bharath Petroleum Dealers Rep. by ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)4MysLJ586

..... of the tenancy agreement,(b) any person who was a tenant in respect of such land under a tenancy agreement to which this act is applicable under sub-section (3) of section 1 and who are any of his predecessors in interest had erected by building on such land and who continues in actual physical possession ..... building, dispensing pumps and canopy as per the permission of the landlord, the third respondent. the respondent corporation is a government of india company under section 617 of the companies act, 1956 and a public sector enterprise of the government of india under the administrative control of the ministry of petroleum and natural gas.3(a). ..... viz., third respondent in accordance with the court order. at the request of the first respondent, the joint chief controller of explosives by letter dated 01.10.2007, has also cancelled the explosives licence and by letter dated 28.09.2007, the first respondent has requested the tamil nadu electricity board to disconnect the electricity .....