Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: central administrative tribunal cat kolkata Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.109 seconds)

Nov 18 2003 (TRI)

Kisalay Mukherjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-18-2003

Reported in : (2004)(3)SLJ382CAT

..... be his appellate authority we do not consider that any prejudice has been caused to the applicant if joint director, n.e. region had acted as his appellate authority.25. lastly the applicant has also raised a question whether the punishment imposed upon him was based on no evidence. ..... need not discuss this point. moreover, the disciplinary authority in this case is not the complainant and hence there is no bar in his acting as disciplinary authority.24. the applicant has also raised a question whether the joint director, cbi, n.e. region was to his appellate ..... cbi/acb/calcutta and till that time, not to file or sign unacceptable attendance in the office of sp/cbi/scb/ calcutta and thus committed acts unbecoming of a govt. servant. he has thereby contravened rule 3(1) (iii) of central civil services (conduct) rules, 1964." according to ..... 1. in this application filed under section 19 of the a.t. act the applicant has challenged the charge sheet dated 28.2.90 issued by the respondent no. 6, the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //