Array
(
    [0] =>  .....  compromise or not.7. to decide this controversy, this court has to look into the provisions of s. 25 of small cause courts act, and provisions of civil procedure code to the said proceedings.8. section 25 of small cause courts act, reads as under:'25. revision of decrees and orders of court of small causes:the high court, for the purpose of satisfying itself ..... .23, r. 3 or the principles thereof are applicable to the proceedings under s. 25 of small cause courts act.12. section 7 of civil procedure code mentions about the provisions which are not applicable to the courts constituted under provisions of small cause courts act, which reads as follows:--'7. provincial small cause courts: the following provisions shall not extend to courts constituted under ..... 
    [1] =>  .....  in the assets as of right. in these circumstances, there was no gift in her favour within the meaning of section 9 of the act.7. now, in view of the decision of the supreme court in the case of kakumanu pedasubhayya, air 1958 sc 1042, perhaps, it cannot be disputed that, under .....  court in the case of prithiviraj pailo v. kautuka babi, air 1970 orissa 4.6. the tribunal also rejected the alternate case of the revenue based on section 9 of the estate duty act by holding that there being a partition in the joint family property, the wife of the karta as a member of a hindu undivided family gets a share .....  filing the application on march 14, 1973, being within two years of the death of the deceased, the same was liable to be treated as deemed gifts under section 9 of the estate duty act accordingly, on the alternative finding also, he held that 50% of the value of the agricultural land was liable to be assessed as property passing on the ..... 
    [2] =>  ..... . in our democratic fibre it is expected that arbitrary approach is seldom required and the case is to proceed as per procedure laid down. the trial court seems to have acted as a sovereign.13. such an approach of the trial court which has unnecessarily procrastinated the proceedings of the case is disapproved. learned counsel for the opposite party sri r .....  290 of 89 deserve to be allowed. the order passed by the court below is liable to be set aside in view of the fact that the trial court has acted in exercise of its jurisdiction with material irregularity which tentamounts in the mis-carriage of justice.15. in the result both the revision no. 276 of 89 and 290 of ..... 
    [3] =>  .....  13.4.1989 by which the appellants' application for setting aside the ex parte award has been dismissed. none of these orders, therefore, will be covered by section 110-d of the motor vehicles act. learned counsel submitted that the appeal lies under order 43, rule 1 (d). however, order 43 has not been made applicable in proceedings under the motor vehicles ..... n.n. mithal, j. 1. this appeal purports to have been filed under order 43, rule 1 (d) read with section 110d of the motor vehicles act. none of the orders annexed with the memo of appeal is the award passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal. the only orders which have been annexed are the one  .....  act. rule 21 of the motor accidents claims tribunals rules applicable in u.p. only makes order 9, rule 13 applicable to these proceedings. this does not include the provision of  ..... 
    [4] =>  .....  accordingly at the admission stage.6. heard the learned counsel for theparties.7. learned counsel for the applicant sri rajesh tandon has very strenuously submitted that the trial court has acted in an arbitrary manner in decreeing the suit even without the applicants (defendants) written statement having been brought on the record. the trial court granted adjournments as many as 13 .....  the record which would have suggested that virendra kumar goel has a right to maintain the suit. the trial court illegally erred in decreeing the suit and has in fact acted in the exercise of the jurisdiction illegally and has committed material irregularity. once such an allegation was made in the plaint giving such a right to sri viredra kumar goel ..... 
    [5] => 
    [6] =>  ..... its property and also to a case for realisation of property of an insolvent partner by the official receiver or court under the presidency-towns and provincial insolvency act. sub-section (4) provides for exception in certain class of cases with which we are not concerned in this appeal.10. as the facts narrated earlier would indicate ..... . subsequently when the plaintiff filed a suit for the recovery of the amount, the plea was raised by the defendant by moving an application under section 34 of the arbitration act. the plaintiff's contention was that the proceedings in the suit could not be stayed. this plea was repelled holding that the dismissal of the ..... -1986, the civil court declared that the appellant was the sole proprietor of the firm supreme traders. subsequent to it, the present proceedings under section 20 of the arbitration act were initiated for referring the dispute to arbitration. the basis of the application was that although the plaintiff had executed the work of the value of ..... 
    [7] =>  .....  be unreasonable.5. so far as the third argument to the effect that the planned industrial development cannot be said to be the public purpose, which required urgent section is concerned, it also lacks force. unemployment is increasing day by day and position is becoming acute and unless state can quickly provide avenues for employment the whole  ..... completed the acquisition proceedings on the basis, that the notification under s. 4 is valid. if writ petitions are entertained against a notification under s. 4 of the act at such a late stage, it would be putting the premium on dilatory tactics. the writ petition is thus liable to be dismissed on this ground also.7. for .....  of the petitioner were proposed to be acquired for the aforesaid purpose. as the government was of the opinion that the provisions of s. 17(1) of the act were applicable to the said land, as it was required urgently for the planned industrial development in district mathura, it directed to disperse with the inquiry under s.  ..... 
    [8] =>  ..... petition is based on the premise that the transport authority has made a delegation, in favour of its secretary of all its powers under s. 62 of the act. section 62, insofar as it is relevant to the present controversy, enables a regional transport authority to grant permits, effective for a limited period not exceeding four months to .....  such a power will arise on the conditions enumerated in the proviso to s. 68-ff being fulfilled. the submission is fallacious.4. sub-section (5) of s.44 of the act provides that the state transport authority or any regional transport authority, if authorised in this behalf by rules made under s. 68, may delegate  ..... temporary permit on that portion. the order rejecting the application for notified portion is being impugned in the present writ petition.2. section 68f of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the act) casts a mandatory duty upon a regional transport authority or the state transport authority, as the case may be, to issue a ..... 
    [9] =>  .....  in the present case, the corporation comes within the definition of an 'industry' and consequently termination of the services of the petitioner without complying with section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, which provides for giving notice and compensation before retrenchment of services, is bad in the eye of law and in breach of the provisions of the  ..... state of punjab was industry within the meaning of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act.7. a driver doing mechanical work and getting less than rs. 500 is a 'workman'. the corporation is to organise and work in various ways for ..... water supply and sewerage board v. rajappa (supra), it was held that the bihar khadi gramodyog sangh is an industry within the meaning of the expression of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act, 1947.in des raj & ors. v. state of punjab & ors. (1988-ii-llj-149) it was held that the irrigation department of the  ..... 
)
Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Recent - Court Allahabad - Year 1989 - Page 5 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: allahabad Year: 1989 Page 5 of about 71 results (0.055 seconds)

Jul 21 1989 (HC)

Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs. the 3rd Addl. District Judge, Bulandshahar and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-21-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All23

..... compromise or not.7. to decide this controversy, this court has to look into the provisions of s. 25 of small cause courts act, and provisions of civil procedure code to the said proceedings.8. section 25 of small cause courts act, reads as under:'25. revision of decrees and orders of court of small causes:the high court, for the purpose of satisfying itself ..... .23, r. 3 or the principles thereof are applicable to the proceedings under s. 25 of small cause courts act.12. section 7 of civil procedure code mentions about the provisions which are not applicable to the courts constituted under provisions of small cause courts act, which reads as follows:--'7. provincial small cause courts: the following provisions shall not extend to courts constituted under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 1989 (HC)

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-20-1989

Reported in : [1989]180ITR382(All); [1990]48TAXMAN69(All)

..... in the assets as of right. in these circumstances, there was no gift in her favour within the meaning of section 9 of the act.7. now, in view of the decision of the supreme court in the case of kakumanu pedasubhayya, air 1958 sc 1042, perhaps, it cannot be disputed that, under ..... court in the case of prithiviraj pailo v. kautuka babi, air 1970 orissa 4.6. the tribunal also rejected the alternate case of the revenue based on section 9 of the estate duty act by holding that there being a partition in the joint family property, the wife of the karta as a member of a hindu undivided family gets a share ..... filing the application on march 14, 1973, being within two years of the death of the deceased, the same was liable to be treated as deemed gifts under section 9 of the estate duty act accordingly, on the alternative finding also, he held that 50% of the value of the agricultural land was liable to be assessed as property passing on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1989 (HC)

Smt. Madhuri Misra and Others Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All42

..... . in our democratic fibre it is expected that arbitrary approach is seldom required and the case is to proceed as per procedure laid down. the trial court seems to have acted as a sovereign.13. such an approach of the trial court which has unnecessarily procrastinated the proceedings of the case is disapproved. learned counsel for the opposite party sri r ..... 290 of 89 deserve to be allowed. the order passed by the court below is liable to be set aside in view of the fact that the trial court has acted in exercise of its jurisdiction with material irregularity which tentamounts in the mis-carriage of justice.15. in the result both the revision no. 276 of 89 and 290 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1989 (HC)

Narendra Singh and ors. Vs. Dhappo

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-1989

Reported in : I(1990)ACC174; 1990ACJ625

..... 13.4.1989 by which the appellants' application for setting aside the ex parte award has been dismissed. none of these orders, therefore, will be covered by section 110-d of the motor vehicles act. learned counsel submitted that the appeal lies under order 43, rule 1 (d). however, order 43 has not been made applicable in proceedings under the motor vehicles ..... n.n. mithal, j. 1. this appeal purports to have been filed under order 43, rule 1 (d) read with section 110d of the motor vehicles act. none of the orders annexed with the memo of appeal is the award passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal. the only orders which have been annexed are the one ..... act. rule 21 of the motor accidents claims tribunals rules applicable in u.p. only makes order 9, rule 13 applicable to these proceedings. this does not include the provision of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 1989 (HC)

Surendra Kumar and Another Vs. Rajendra Kumar Agarwal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-17-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All49

..... accordingly at the admission stage.6. heard the learned counsel for theparties.7. learned counsel for the applicant sri rajesh tandon has very strenuously submitted that the trial court has acted in an arbitrary manner in decreeing the suit even without the applicants (defendants) written statement having been brought on the record. the trial court granted adjournments as many as 13 ..... the record which would have suggested that virendra kumar goel has a right to maintain the suit. the trial court illegally erred in decreeing the suit and has in fact acted in the exercise of the jurisdiction illegally and has committed material irregularity. once such an allegation was made in the plaint giving such a right to sri viredra kumar goel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 1989 (HC)

Raghubir Saran and Others Vs. Krishna Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-05-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All14

ORDER1. The list has been revised. Nobody appears for the parties.2. In Original Suit No. 36 of 1979, Chudhari Krishna Kumar v. Raghubir Saran, pending in the Court of Judge, Small Causes, Moradabad, the applicants, who figure as defendants, raised a plea to the effect that the suit was wrongly valued. They further asserted that the value given in Schedule Ka had been wrongly given. And that the real price given by plaintiff was much less, It was also the plea of the applicants that the value of the property shown by the plaintiff was more than the marked value. In support of the pleadings the applicants did not give any detail. By means of the order dated 25th August, 1982, impugned in the instant revision, the applicants have been called upon to give details.3. Under R.5 of O.VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Court can always, in all cases, order furnishing of a further and better statement of the nature of the claim or defence, or further and better particulars of any matter s...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 1989 (HC)

Chhote Lal Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-04-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All27

..... its property and also to a case for realisation of property of an insolvent partner by the official receiver or court under the presidency-towns and provincial insolvency act. sub-section (4) provides for exception in certain class of cases with which we are not concerned in this appeal.10. as the facts narrated earlier would indicate ..... . subsequently when the plaintiff filed a suit for the recovery of the amount, the plea was raised by the defendant by moving an application under section 34 of the arbitration act. the plaintiff's contention was that the proceedings in the suit could not be stayed. this plea was repelled holding that the dismissal of the ..... -1986, the civil court declared that the appellant was the sole proprietor of the firm supreme traders. subsequent to it, the present proceedings under section 20 of the arbitration act were initiated for referring the dispute to arbitration. the basis of the application was that although the plaintiff had executed the work of the value of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1989 (HC)

Brij Bhushan Goswami Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-02-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All15; (1990)1UPLBEC537

..... be unreasonable.5. so far as the third argument to the effect that the planned industrial development cannot be said to be the public purpose, which required urgent section is concerned, it also lacks force. unemployment is increasing day by day and position is becoming acute and unless state can quickly provide avenues for employment the whole ..... completed the acquisition proceedings on the basis, that the notification under s. 4 is valid. if writ petitions are entertained against a notification under s. 4 of the act at such a late stage, it would be putting the premium on dilatory tactics. the writ petition is thus liable to be dismissed on this ground also.7. for ..... of the petitioner were proposed to be acquired for the aforesaid purpose. as the government was of the opinion that the provisions of s. 17(1) of the act were applicable to the said land, as it was required urgently for the planned industrial development in district mathura, it directed to disperse with the inquiry under s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1989 (HC)

Nadir HusaIn Vs. Regional Transport Officer, Kanpur

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-17-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All35

..... petition is based on the premise that the transport authority has made a delegation, in favour of its secretary of all its powers under s. 62 of the act. section 62, insofar as it is relevant to the present controversy, enables a regional transport authority to grant permits, effective for a limited period not exceeding four months to ..... such a power will arise on the conditions enumerated in the proviso to s. 68-ff being fulfilled. the submission is fallacious.4. sub-section (5) of s.44 of the act provides that the state transport authority or any regional transport authority, if authorised in this behalf by rules made under s. 68, may delegate ..... temporary permit on that portion. the order rejecting the application for notified portion is being impugned in the present writ petition.2. section 68f of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the act) casts a mandatory duty upon a regional transport authority or the state transport authority, as the case may be, to issue a .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1989 (HC)

Nathaniel Masih Vs. U.P. Scheduled Caste Finance and Development Corpn ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-16-1989

Reported in : [1989(59)FLR620]; (1991)IILLJ347All

..... in the present case, the corporation comes within the definition of an 'industry' and consequently termination of the services of the petitioner without complying with section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, which provides for giving notice and compensation before retrenchment of services, is bad in the eye of law and in breach of the provisions of the ..... state of punjab was industry within the meaning of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act.7. a driver doing mechanical work and getting less than rs. 500 is a 'workman'. the corporation is to organise and work in various ways for ..... water supply and sewerage board v. rajappa (supra), it was held that the bihar khadi gramodyog sangh is an industry within the meaning of the expression of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act, 1947.in des raj & ors. v. state of punjab & ors. (1988-ii-llj-149) it was held that the irrigation department of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //