Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 74 of about 4,604 results (0.119 seconds)

Feb 25 2003 (SC)

Ranbir Singh and ors. Vs. Kartar Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : AIR2003SC1858; [2003(2)JCR205(SC)]; 2003(2)SCALE424; (2003)3SCC518; [2003]2SCR291

..... by her mother (after her death in 1968) in favour of the defendants in the year 1936 as void ab initio is governed by the provisions of the act or limitation act, 1963. the facts that are not disputed or found established are the following.8. disputed lands were inherited by sihnu and nainu from their father. after their death ..... narotam chand and anr. v. mst. durga devi , that the suit of the plaintiff was governed by general law of limitation under article 65 of the limitation act, 1963 (old act of 1908) wherein the period of limitation prescribed is 12 years for a suit for possession of immovable property from the date of cause of action that has arisen ..... under hindu law he was a male lineal descendant of the last occupancy tenant and was entitled to succeed to the tenancy in view of the provisions of section 59, punjab tenancy act. on those allegations i fall to understand how could act 1 of 1920 (sic) made applicable to that suit, the claim being based under hindu law. moreover, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Smt. Basanti Satapathy and Two ors. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Satapathy

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR516

..... a balance between the two and not sacrificing one at the altar of the other. therefore, it may be proper to consider whether proviso (b) to section 115 of the code introduced by act 104 of 1976 should not be restored.8. i allow the revision. the order of the court below is set aside. the application for amendment will stand ..... that the order of the court below requires to be interfered with.7. before parting with this case, i may observe that proviso (b) to section 115 of the civil procedure code introduced by amending act 104 of 1976 served a salutary purpose. it enabled the revisional court to interfere with an order if the order challenged, if allowed to stand, was ..... on by the learned counsel is more in point. therein, the effect of the amendment has been discussed. a literal reading of the proviso to section 115 of the code as it reads after amending act 22 of 2002, and the indication available by the dropping of clause (b) of the proviso to the effect that interference was possible in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Satinderpalsingh Anand Vs. Sharnpal Balmukund Chopra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : 2003(6)BomCR830

..... no. 363 of 1988, was only respect of two flats. the issues were framed in respect of two flats. the matter was referred to court under section 21 of the arbitration act, 1940. amendment if any could not have been allowed by the arbitrator. the amendment if any had to be made before the civil court where the suit ..... was allowed by order dated 13th august, 1999. the respondent herein sought reference of the subject-matter of both the suits. the said petition was under section 21 of the arbitration act, 1940 which provides that where all the parties in any suit agree that any matter in difference between them in the suit, shall be referred to arbitration ..... was represented and cause of action survives, is devoid of merit as it must also be shown that anand was the legal representative, as provided under section 211 of the indian succession act. this was not the case and consequently satinder pal could not have represented the estate of deceased and hence, the suit filed by chopra abates in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Rechery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN335(Ker)

..... the name and addresses of those customers. in other words, the dispute is only regarding the scope and content of the provisions of section 133(6) of the act.section 133(6) of the act as amended by act 22 of 1995 with effect from 1-7-1995 reads as follows :'(6) require any person, including a banking company or any officer ..... high court in grindlays bank ltd. v. ito : [1998]231itr612(cal) had held that even after the insertion of the word `enquiry in sub-section (6) of section 133 by the finance act, 1995 and the insertion of the second proviso thereto with effect from 1-7-1995 unless there is a proceeding pending against the assessee when the ..... the notice it is stated that the information is required in connection with the investigation of the appellants case and the same is required under section 133(6) of the act. according to the appellants section 133(6) does not clothe the respondents with any power for conducting a roving enquiry into the affairs of the appellants or regarding the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Vivek Agrawal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : 2004ACJ893

Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. Both these appeals, State of Madhya Pradesh v. Vivek Agrawal, M.A. No. 149 of 1997 and Vivek Agrawal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, M.A. No. 563 of 1997, are proposed to be decided by this judgment since they arise out of the same award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bhopal in M.C.C. No. 317 of 1996 dated 17.1.1997.2. On 11.3.1990 at about 11 a.m., Vivek Agrawal (claimant) was going on his motor cycle from Arera Colony to his residence, D 11/20, Char Imli, Bhopal. On the crossing of Reserve Bank Colony, Mohan Singh (driver) came from Char Imli driving jeep CPZ 4112 rashly and negligently and hit the motor cycle of the claimant without giving signal when claimant was turning towards his residence. Claimant fell down, came under the right side tyre of the jeep, sustained injuries and became unconscious. Jeep driver sped away from the spot. The claimant was brought home in state of unconsciousness, shifted to New Bhopal Hospital and after preliminary treatment, tak...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Anjana Saikia (Das) Vs. Anuradha Das and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

..... inter alia, that the allegation made by the petitioner in the fir are defamatory and, as such, the petitioner has committed the offence of defamation. an enquiry under section 202 cr.pc was conducted and thereafter the learned addl. chief judicial magistrate, tinsukia took cognisance of the offence and issued processes vide order dated 31.7.2001. 5 ..... in this case as the petitioner was an eye witness to the incident and she has merely stated the same in fir filed by her. the petitioner never acted on any reported or hearsay evidence or on the basis of purported statement of some other person. 12. upon hearing the submission of the learned counsel for both ..... sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused. (6) where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the code or the concerned act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the code or the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Santosh Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR457

..... visited bichikota when some villagers impressed upon him that the petitioner should not be allowed to join because he was involved in g.r. case no. 137 of 1994 under sections 351 and 325 i.p.c. as petitioner had suppressed the above fact i.e. involvement in the said g.r. case, the tribunal took exception to it and held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Chitradurga District Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Bhadra Sahakari Sakkare Karkhan ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ300Kant

..... since the government holds 65 per cent. paid up share capital, it is stated, in exercise of the power conferred under the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 29 of the act, the government of karnataka has deputed an officer of the co-operation department holding the rank of joint registrar as the chief executive of the first ..... needs to be noticed that the first respondent sugar factory is an 'assisted society' within the meaning of that term as defined under section 2(a-1) of the act.section 29 of the act empowers the state government to nominate not more than three persons as its representatives on the committee of any assisted society. since the respondent ..... vajpayee, : (1980)illj222sc . if there is an instrumentality or agency of the state which has assumed the garb of a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act, it does not follow that it thereby ceases to be an instrumentality or agency of the state. for the purposes of article 12 one must necessarily see .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (TRI)

G.C. Bafna Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

Reported in : (2004)90ITD115(Pune.)

..... fresh consideration.?" 2. i have heard the rival submissions in the light of material placed before me and precedents relied upon.3. notice under section 158bc of the it act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the act'), was issued and served on the assessee on 7th april, 1997, calling for the return for the block period. the assessee did not ..... not complied with-but certainly not void or illegal..... held, allowing the appeal, that the tribunal was correct in holding that non-service of notice under section 143(2) of the it act, 1961, to nine out of the ten legal representatives of the. deceased s did not invalidate the assessment orders of the ito relating to the ..... the assessee and in case of trucks acquired before the previous year, actual cost to the assessee less of depreciation actually allowed to him under the act as per provisions of section 43(6), after getting necessary details from the assessee. "the depreciation determined for any of the years remained unabsorbed in the block period is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (FN)

Miller-el Vs. Cockrell

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-25-2003

..... )(1) by attacking the process employed by the state factfinder rather than the actual factfindings. this reading is confirmed by the changes worked by aedpa. section 2254(e)(1) does not, as its predecessor did, create exceptions to factual deference for procedural infirmities. for example, prior to aedpa, a federal ..... underlying constitutional claim, not the resolution of that debate. in this case, the statistical evidence alone raises some debate as to whether the prosecution acted with a race-based reason when striking prospective jurors. the prosecutors used their peremptory strikes to exclude 91% of the eligible african-american venire members ..... the question is the debatability of the underlying constitutional claim, not the resolution of that debate. in this case, debate as to whether the prosecution acted with a race-based reason when striking prospective jurors was raised by the statistical evidence demonstrating that 91% of the eligible mricanamericans were excluded from petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //