Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 22 of about 4,604 results (0.306 seconds)

Lufthansa German Air Lines Vs. Lufthansa German Airlines Employees Uni ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003IAD(Delhi)709; 102(2003)DLT762; 2003(67)DRJ217; [2003(97)FLR446]; (2003)IILLJ212Del; 2003(1)SLJ208b(Delhi)

..... ) drj 253, wherein it was held that the disputes, which fall within the ambit of the definition of industrial dispute as defined in section 2(r) of the act would be triable exclusively by the tribunals constituted under the act and not by the civil court. the plaintiff in the plaint is seeking enforcement of rights or obligations created under the provisions of ..... were sought.5. unfair labour practice has been defined in section 2(ra) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). section 25t in chapter vc of the act prohibits any employer, workman or trade union from committing any unfair trade practice. act of committing any unfair trade practice under section 25u of the act is punishable. matters specified in schedule ii are within .....

Bharatiya Dak Tar Mazdoor Manch Through Its President Vs. General Mana ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR950; 2003(4)BomCR189

..... than 240 days in a year, preceding their termination, under an employer. what is continuous service has been defined and explained in section 25-b of the i.d. act. the expression in sub-section (1) of section 25-b that a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of workmen requires to be considered ..... for the first respondent, at the outset, submitted that even 57 workmen out of 83 had also not completed 240 days of service as contemplated under section 25-b of the i.d. act. however, taking their attendance during 1990 which was continuous and that they had made themselves available for work, the first respondent took lenient view and ..... of the casual labour committee and only 26 workmen were once again terminated with effect from 1st july, 1990 without following the due procedure contemplated under section 25-f of the i.d. act. in his submission, prior to their reinstatement on 1st january, 1990 itself all 26 workmen had worked had worked for 240 days during the period .....

Hazura Singh Through His Widow-cum-legal Representative Smt. Kirpal Ka ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)135PLR476

..... the regulations framed by u.p. state road transport corporation cannot be held applicable to its employees because the same had not been notified under section 13-b of the 1946 act and the model standing orders would regulate their service conditions.15. in divisional forest officer, gadchiroli v. madhukar ramaji undirwade and etc., 1995 lab ..... he could not place before the court the notification issued by the government of punjab notifying the 1972 regulations framed by the board under section 79(c) of the 1948 act.12. in our considered opinion, issuance of notification by the appropriate government of the rules and regulations is sine qua non for excluding ..... legal representative of late shri hazura singh cannot be given any relief because the age of superannuation prescribed under the 1972 regulations framed under section 79(c) of the 1948 act is 58 years. learned counsel further submitted that even though late shri hazura singh became entitled to be reinstated in service in view of .....

Ramesh Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC536

..... discharged from base hospital, delhi cantt, you remained absent from 26th october, 1996 to 1st december, 1996. for this you were tried by your commanding officer under army act section 39(a) and awarded punishment of 'severe reprimand' and '14 days pay fine' which is one of the minimum punishments awarded to an n.c.o. however, ..... give respondents any such power to automatically treat his promotion to the substantive rank of havaldar to have been relinquished on the award of punishment under section 39(a) of the act.10. the army headquarter has been repeatedly approaching the audit authorities to award petitioner's pension of the rank of havaldar but for the reasons ..... with regard to the award of pension applicable to post of havaldar. in his written submission he stated that after award of punishment to petitioner under section 39(a) of the army act, petitioner was automatically relinquished as havaldar (h.m.t.) as per army instruction no. 84 of 1968, and that petitioner is not entitled to .....

Ujjal Transport Agency and anr. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... court in m/s central coal fields ltd. v. state of orissa and others, air 1992 sc 1371. the supreme court taking into consideration the provisions of section 2(18) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, as amended in 1956, held as follows : '8. it would be appropriate now to mention that somedocumentary material was sent to us by the ..... the mine and these are not meant for use on public road and, as such, the respondents have no authority to direct registration of the same under section 39 of the motor vehicles act, and to levy any tax thereon. mr. goswami further elaborated that entry 57 of list-ii of schedule vii of the constitution empowers the state to ..... within the enclosed premises of the mining areas. according to the petitioner, the dumpers cannot be treated as 'motor vehicles' or 'vehicles' within the meaning of section 2(18) of the motor vehicles act. 4. as usual, the state government filed no return in the instant case. therefore, decision on the question raised has to be on the basis of .....

Management of State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs. Santosh Kumar Mishr ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR885]; (2003)IIILLJ607All

..... the normal procedure prescribed i.e. through the recruitment board. in absence of such evidence, the tribunal was not justified in giving mechanical finding that section 25h of the act was violated. the tribunal has not noted, even in a cursory manner, or found as a matter of fact, that fresh hands were taken ..... were terminated. further he contended that no notice for retrenchment or compensation was given. all this, he claimed, apart from being in violation of section 25-g and h of the act, also contravened the provisions of shastri award and tripartite settlement. this action, it was contended, was arbitrary, discriminatory, unjustified and amounted to unfair ..... mentioned therein had expired. no order of termination was passed by the petitioner bank. the government referred the dispute under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the act) vide notification dated may 29, 1986 which was to the following effect:'whether the action of the management of state .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Birla Jute and Industries Ltd. (Present ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2003)180CTR(Cal)339,[2003]260ITR55(Cal)

..... within the excluded article provided in the eleventh schedule would be the subject matter of provision under sub-clause (iii) of clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 32a of the act. therefore, this provision also does not say anything that the plant must be related directly to the manufacturing purpose. the plant must be related to ..... assessee for the assessment year 1985-86. the learned tribunal affirmed the order of the appellate authority. on this the department had sought for reference under section 256(1) of the act on the question referred to above, which has since been referred to this court by the learned tribunal. 9. the question seems to be simple. ..... given by the karnataka and the orissa high courts. we also draw inspiration from the said decisions in order to support our view. section 32(1) : additional depreciation : 11. section 32(1) of the act allows deduction for depreciation of plant (among others) owned by the assessee and used for the purpose of the business as may be .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ganganagar Sahkari Spinning Mills Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(Raj)407; [2004]265ITR540(Raj)

..... of this court:'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that the deduction under section 80p of the it act should be allowed before set-off of unabsorbed losses of earlier years ?'2. it is agreed by the learned counsel for the parties that the ..... present case, the gross total income must be determined by setting off against the income the business losses of the earlier years as required under section 72 of the act.'the apex court further observed :'the principle of statutory construction invoked by mrs. ramachandran has no application in construing the expression 'gross total income' in ..... purposes of chapter vi-a, the expression 'gross total income' is defined in clause (5) of section 80b in the following terms :'(5) 'gross total income' means the total income computed in accordance with the provisions of this act, before making any deduction under this chapter.'6. the apex court after reading the relevant provisions stated above .....

Sitaram Nayak Vs. Smt. Usharani Das

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR370

ORDERP.K. Tripathy, J.1. Heard.2. This Civil Revision is taken up out of turn on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and stands disposed of because of the following reasons.3. Petitioner filed an application under Order 26 Rule 9, C.P.C. for demarcation of the land through the Court Amin and that has been rejected by the learned Court below inter alia, on the ground that the suit has been targetted by the High Court to be disposed of within a time frame. On being asked, Mr. Swain learned counsel for the petitioner states that in Civil Revision No. 3 of 2002 this Court issued a direction for disposal of the suit by the end of January, 2003. He also produces xerox copy of that order for perusal of this Court. It is seen from that order that it is at the instance of the present petitioner that such a target has been fixed.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to and relying on the case of Mahendranath Parida v. Purnananda Parida and Ors., 64 (1987) C.L.T. 722, stat...

Sajit Kumar, P. and ors. Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Income

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ61CAT

..... .1995, in r.k. sabharwal's case. the respondents have also relied upon the 85th constitutional amendment, whereby article 16 of the constitution has been amended. the said 85th amendment act, 2001 reads as under: "in article 16 of the constitution, in clause (4-a), for the words, "in matters of promotion to any class," the words "in matters of promotion ..... india, the law declared by the supreme court is binding on all courts. similarly under article 144, all authorities civil and judicial in the territory of india, are required to act in aid of the hon'ble supreme court. as such, even if no o.m. is issued by the nodal ministry, the law declared by hon'ble supreme court becomes .....