Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 1989 Page 84 of about 1,699 results (0.149 seconds)

Tumkur Town Veerashiva Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. H.C.Shyamala and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1991]70CompCas850(Bom)

..... , the contention of the petitioner is not different from what it was before the arbitrator as well as the revenue appellate tribunal and that contention is founded on section 176 of the contract act read with clauses 5 and 10 of the hypothecation agreement as at annexure 'a' to the writ petition. the contention in summary is thus : that the ..... operative societies, tumkur, who, by his order dated april 18, 1983 in dispute no. 37 of 82-83 upheld the contention of the bank in terms of section 176 of the contract act read with clause 5 and clause 10 of the agreement of hypothecation as at annexure 'a' to the petition that the bank had a right to seize the ..... of the loan advanced notwithstanding the fact that payment of dues to the co-operative society/ bank is a matter, recovery of which is provided for under section 70 of the co-operative societies act, by way of dispute in the specified manner, thereby excluding any other method available to a co-operative institution? 4. so far as the first .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Navalkishor Mangilal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1990MPLJ412

..... profits is permitted expressly or impliedly and for that matter, it is examinable also if claim in that regard is interdicted expressly or impliedly. as per section 5 of the said act, the entitlement of the landlord is restricted to recover from the tenant only 'standard rent' for the accommodation in possession of the tenant. what is more ..... relevance of use of the words 'any sum' and 'any consideration whatsoever' to justify the view taken.8. the primacy of the statutory mandate of section 13 of the act needs also to be underscored in this connection. when a tenant does everything which he is required to do by the statutory provision by continuing to pay ..... to vacate the premises at the bidding of the landlord. as held by this court in lachhobai rathore, 1989 mprcj 23 - 1988 jlj 213, section 13(5) of the rent control act extends the protection against eviction to the statutory tenant upto the stage of execution. thereunder, the landlord's claim against tenant for compensation in terms .....

County of Allegheny Vs. Aclu

Court : US Supreme Court

..... spirit"). [ footnote 55 ] justice kennedy evidently believes that contemporary references to exclusively christian creeds (like the trinity or the divinity of jesus) in official acts or proclamations is justified by the religious sentiments of those responsible for the adoption of the first amendment. see 2 j. story, commentaries on the ..... the court is this: that we will not tolerate either governmentally established religion or governmental interference with religion. short of those expressly proscribed governmental acts, there is room for play in the joints productive of a benevolent neutrality which will permit religious exercise to exist page 492 u. s. ..... 605, and nn. 53-54, the relevant historical practices are those conducted by governmental units which were subject to the constraints of the establishment clause. acts of "official discrimination against non-christians" perpetrated in the 18th and 19th centuries by states and municipalities are, of course, irrelevant to this inquiry, .....

Webster Vs. Reproductive Health Svcs.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... has not appealed those parts of the judgment below. see juris. statement i-ii. [ footnote 3 ] ii decision of this case requires us to address four sections of the missouri act: (a) the preamble; (b) the prohibition on the use of public facilities or employees to perform abortions; (c) the prohibition on public funding of abortion ..... state, inc., 454 u. s. 464 , 454 u. s. 473 (1982). [ footnote 6 ] we therefore need not pass on the constitutionality of the act's preamble. b section 188.210 provides that "[i]t shall be unlawful for any public employee within the scope of his employment to perform or assist an abortion, not necessary to ..... moot in part by [appellees'] willingness permanently to withdraw their equitable claims from their federal action, a dismissal with prejudice is indicated." ibid. d section 188.029 of the missouri act provides: "before a physician performs an abortion on a woman he has reason to believe is carrying an unborn child of twenty or more weeks gestational .....

Chhote Lal Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1990All27

..... its property and also to a case for realisation of property of an insolvent partner by the official receiver or court under the presidency-towns and provincial insolvency act. sub-section (4) provides for exception in certain class of cases with which we are not concerned in this appeal.10. as the facts narrated earlier would indicate ..... . subsequently when the plaintiff filed a suit for the recovery of the amount, the plea was raised by the defendant by moving an application under section 34 of the arbitration act. the plaintiff's contention was that the proceedings in the suit could not be stayed. this plea was repelled holding that the dismissal of the ..... -1986, the civil court declared that the appellant was the sole proprietor of the firm supreme traders. subsequent to it, the present proceedings under section 20 of the arbitration act were initiated for referring the dispute to arbitration. the basis of the application was that although the plaintiff had executed the work of the value of .....

T. Manneyya Vs. Commissioner of Settlements, Survey and Land Records a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT623

..... of ryotwari patta to the petitioner dated november 29, 1965, and remitted to the settlement officer to conduct an enquiry into the rival claims under section 56(1) of the act. assailing the legality thereof, the writ petition has been filed.2. the contention of sri rangacharyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner that the grant ..... his proceedings dated march 18, 1966, to which the petitioner objected by his objections dated august 29,1966 that he was already granted ryotwari patta under section 11 (a) of the act. the assistant settlement officer, nellore by which date proceedings were transferred to him, has dropped the proceedings on october 31,1972. then revision was ..... of ryotwari patta in respect of survey no. 104. while so, the petitioner appears to have filed an application for grant of ryotwari patta under section 11 (a) of the act and the assistant settlement officer, chittoor granted to the petitioner the ryotwari patta on november 29, 1965. there does not appear to have been any .....

P. Rajasekharappa Vs. Commissioner, Corporation of the City of Bangalo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR3234

..... , the corporation will take immediate steps to see that any construction which is contrary to law is proceeded against in accordance with the provisions contained in the karnataka municipal corporations act as well as any other law for the timebeing in force within karnataka subject to its decision in matters pending either compounding or post facto sanction for any violation.11 ..... calculating the floor area ratio of the building. it cannot have the effect of defining judicially or otherwise the expression 'basement'. the word 'basement' is not defined in the corporations act or the zonal regulations with which we are concerned and therefore the court must give it the ordinary meaning given to that expression in the english language which is to .....

T.V. Parangodan Vs. District Collector, Trichur and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1989Ker276

..... v. dewades, air 1982 sc 800 said that no separate application is necessary and a prayer to that effect in the memorandum of appeal is sufficient. section 5 of the limitation act only mentions 'satisfies the court'. nadubhagom m.s. karayogam v. gopalan nair, 1979 ker lt 166 said that no formal application is necessary. that decision ..... , afterhearing the parties, that no urgent orimmediate relief need as granted in the suit,return the plaint for presentation to it aftercomplying with the requirements of sub-section (1).3. in this case the defendant-state entered appearance and objected to the maintainability of the suit for want of notice and requested the plaint to ..... was followed in ramadevan v. state, 1986 ker lt sn 3 case no. 4 : (1987 cri lj 13). section 20 of the code of civil procedure also contemplates .....

Union of India Vs. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1989(24)LC240(Bombay); 1989(43)ELT225(Bom)

..... against the interim order passed on 19th july 1988 in the respondents' writ petition. the learned single judge, upon a prima facie interpretation of section 11a(3)(ii)(b) of the central excises and salt act, entertained doubts as to whether the collector could have issued the show cause notice that is impugned in the petition. accordingly, he restrained further ..... respect to the delhi high court, we are of the view that an examination of the provision by this court is required. it will be seen that sub-section (1) of section 11a, which invests the officer with the power to issue a show cause notice, invests him with the power to do so within a stated time 'from the ..... has come and gone is, therefore, a sine qua non of the valid exercise of the power conferred by sub-section 1. the definition of 'relevant date' appropriate to the present case is contained in sub-section (3)(ii)(b) of section 11a. where, as here, excise duty has been provisionally assessed, it is the date of adjustment of duty .....

Raghubir Saran and Others Vs. Krishna Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1990All14

ORDER1. The list has been revised. Nobody appears for the parties.2. In Original Suit No. 36 of 1979, Chudhari Krishna Kumar v. Raghubir Saran, pending in the Court of Judge, Small Causes, Moradabad, the applicants, who figure as defendants, raised a plea to the effect that the suit was wrongly valued. They further asserted that the value given in Schedule Ka had been wrongly given. And that the real price given by plaintiff was much less, It was also the plea of the applicants that the value of the property shown by the plaintiff was more than the marked value. In support of the pleadings the applicants did not give any detail. By means of the order dated 25th August, 1982, impugned in the instant revision, the applicants have been called upon to give details.3. Under R.5 of O.VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Court can always, in all cases, order furnishing of a further and better statement of the nature of the claim or defence, or further and better particulars of any matter s...