Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2006 Page 32 of about 337 results (0.070 seconds)

Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD(Cri)44; 2007CriLJ766; 2006(13)SCALE168

..... that time. all the accused by that time came to know that their involvement in the crime is known to the investigating officer.16. in his statements under section 313 of the code of criminal procedure, the appellant might have contended that he did not know baldev singh but the fact remains that he, baldev singh and ..... sessions judge convicted the appellant, baldev singh, nirpal singh and nardev singh under section 302 of the indian penal code and sections 25 and 27 of the arms act and sentenced them to suffer imprisonment for life. pargat singh, however, was acquitted. appeals there against were preferred by all the ..... long was present. two surgical drain wounds on each side of flanks of the abdomen and two surgical stitched drain wound on both sides of the chest with vene section wound on the left ankle and left elbow.8. relying on or on the basis of the said evidences brought on record by the prosecution, the learned additional .....

Lopez Vs. Gonzales

Court : US Supreme Court

..... united states , 464 u. s. 16 , 23 (1983) ( [w]here congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same act, it is generally presumed that congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion (alteration in original; internal quotation marks omitted)). unless a state offense is ..... eighth circuit no. 05 547. argued october 3, 2006 decided december 5, 2006 the immigration and nationality act (ina) lists as an aggravated felony illicit trafficking in a controlled substance including a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 924(c) of title 18), 8 u. s. c. 1101(a)(43)(b), but does not ..... felony as illicit trafficking in a controlled substance including a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 924(c) of title 18). 1101(a)(43)(b). and the term drug trafficking crime means any felony punishable under the controlled substances act . 18 u. s. c. 924(c)(2). lopez s state felony offense qualifies as .....

Parkash Singh Badal and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1274; 2007(3)ALD8(SC); JT2007(1)SC89; 2006(13)SCALE54; (2007)1SCC1; 2007AIRSCW115; (2007)1SCC(Cri)193; 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)142; 2007(1)KLJ497; 2007(2)KCCRSN92.

..... committed must have something to do, or must be related in some manner, with the discharge of official duty. no question of sanction can arise under section 197, unless the act complained of is an offence; the only point for determination is whether it was committed in the discharge of official duty. there must be a reasonable ..... , it is not every offence committed by a public servant while engaged in the performance of his official duty, which is entitled to the protection of section 197(1), an act constituting an offence, directly and reasonably connected with his official duty will require sanction for prosecution under the said provision. use of the expression, 'official duty ..... legislative assembly. shri sukhbir singh badal was a member of the parliament. as noted above, primary stand is that the effect of section 6(2) of the old act corresponding to section 19(2) of the act was not considered and in that view of the matter the judgment in antulay's case (supra) is to be considered per .....

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Ameerbi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(1)SC279; (2007)ILLJ996SC; 2006(13)SCALE319

..... v. peep chand pandey and anr. : air1993sc382 wherein casual employees were found to come within the purview of section 14(1) of the act holding:.an examination of section 14 and section 3(q) clearly indicates that the act covers a very wide field, and there is nothing to suggest that the provisions dealing with the jurisdiction of the ..... the nomenclature of payment is not decisive. our attention in this connection has also been drawn to the definition of 'post' as contained in section 3(k) of the act.6. the scheme was floated by the central government with certain objects. the staff pattern at the project level has been laid down in the ..... precise types of personnel whom the state government consider fit for such work. 2. anganwadi workers filed an application purported to be under section 15 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (for short 'the act') before the karnataka state administrative tribunal. in one of such applications being nagarathna b.k. and ors. v. the secretary, social .....

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Balaji Computers and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(14)SCALE240; (2007)2SCC743; (2007)5VST120(SC); JT2007(1)SC250

..... these two circulars that the central board of direct taxes, which is the highest authority entrusted with the execution of the provisions of the act, understood sub-section (2) as limited to cases where the consideration for the transfer has been understated by the assessee and this must be regarded as ..... authorities etc., to levy turnover tax on parts of computer and parts of computer peripherals. the assessing authorities exercising the powers under section 12a of kst act issued proposition notices to the dealers proposing to levy turnover tax on parts of computer and parts of computer peripherals for the relevant assessment ..... president, association for information technology, 15/13 floor, dickenson road, bangalore.4. the commissioner of commercial taxes, karnataka exercising the powers under section 3a of the kst act issued another circular no. 15/2004-05 dated 31.12.2004 directing the assessing authorities, revisional authorities, joint commissioners, inspecting authorities, audit .....

Vadla Chandraiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007CriLJ770; [2007(2)JCR258(SC)]; 2006(14)SCALE108; 2006AIRSCW6466; (2006)13SCC587

..... whether the fight was sudden or not and/or whether the deceased has taken undue advantage of the situation in the following words:9. the fourth exception to section 300 ipc covers acts done in a sudden fight. the said exception deals with a case or prosecution not covered by the first exception, after which its place would have been ..... not attracted as it is beyond any doubt or dispute that the death was not caused with an intention to that effect.fourthly, appended to section 300, would be attributed if the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily, injury as is likely to ..... cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid that will attract section 300 of the indian penal code.12. in sukhbir singh v. state of haryana : [2002]1scr1152 , wherein two fatal .....

Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007CriLJ782; 2006(13)SCALE256; (2007)1SCC242

..... at a finding on the basis of broad probabilities. however, while dealing with a special statute like mcoca having regard to the provisions contained in sub-section (4) of section 21 of the act, the court may have to probe into the matter deeper so as to enable it to arrive at a finding that the materials collected against the ..... it does not provide that even in case a person remains behind the bars for a period exceeding three years, although his involvement may be in terms of section 24 of the act, the court is prohibited to enlarge him on bail. each case, therefore, must be considered on its own facts. the question as to whether he is ..... 474, 475, 476 and 34 of the indian penal code. a case was also registered under the provisions of section 63(a) and 63(b) of the bombay stamps act, 1958. subsequently, sections 3 and 24 of the maharashtra control of organized crimes act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as 'mcoca') were also invoked. against some of the accused, including the appellant, .....

Ajendraprasadji N. Pande and anr. Vs. Swami Keshavprakeshdasji N. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC806; 2007(2)ALD93(SC); RLW2007(3)SC1790; 2006(13)SCALE525; (2006)12SCC1

..... any stage'. the proviso uses the phrase 'no application for amendment shall be allowed'.20. the submission of the learned senior counsel is that when in the same section of an act the word may is used in one place and shall in another place, may will have to be interpreted as may and shall will have to be interpreted as ..... . i have no reason to disbelieve the same. the above submission assumes significance for the reason that first defendant is a proclaimed offender. the proclamation has been issued under section 82 of cr.p.c. for the alleged commission of certain offences. he has not yet surrendered to the court. in page 4 of the counter affidavit, it is ..... wholly omitted so that an amendment itself was not permissible, although sometimes effort was made to rely on section 148 for extension of time for any purpose. ultimately to strike a balance the legislature applied its mind and re-introduced rule 17 by act 22 of 2002 w.e.f. 1.7.2002. it had a provision permitting amendment in the .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sheela Rani

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR708]; 2006(13)SCALE394

..... of the tribunal's order warranting any further action to be taken against the alleged contemnors under the provisions of the contempt of courts act, 1971 read with section 17 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. the contempt petition was dismissed and the notice to contemnors was discharged. however, the tribunal granted liberty to the respondent herein ..... date of initial appointment being 17.11.1982 was rejected. aggrieved by the said order, the respondent filed o.a. no. 1926 of 2003 under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act before the tribunal. the tribunal allowed o.a. vide order dated 25.2.2004. against the said order, the appellants preferred c.w.p. nos ..... been performing the job of noting down complaints at the enquiry offices/service stations of c.p.w.d. the respondent approached the tribunal under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 and prayed that she should be regularized on the post of enquiry clerk in c.p.w.d. before the tribunal, the appellants .....

Sathi Vijay Kumar Vs. Tota Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(14)SCALE199; 2007AIRSCW304; 2007AIRSCW304; (2006)13SCC353

..... by a recognised political party and a candidate not set up by a recognised political party is precise. a perusal of first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 33 of the act makes it clear that a candidate not set up by a recognised political party, meaning thereby a candidate set up by an unrecognised political party ..... of the prospects of the first respondent.29. with respect, the high court was wrong in interpreting and applying the ambit and scope of sub- section (7) of section 123 of the act. the provision has been reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment. it enacts that it would be deemed to be a corrupt practice if assistance ..... brijinder singh, who was one of the candidates at the election, had not been joined as party respondent. the learned counsel for the appellant contended that section 82 of the act requires a candidate to be joined as party respondent in an election petition against whom allegations of corrupt practice has been leveled. since allegations had been leveled .....