Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2006 Page 14 of about 337 results (0.168 seconds)

Randall Vs. Sorrell

Court : US Supreme Court

..... have changed buckley s result. the buckley court was aware of the connection between expenditure limits and a reduction in fundraising time. in a section of the opinion dealing with feca s public financing provisions, it wrote that congress was trying to free candidates from the rigors of fundraising. ..... of presidential elections. when the seasoned campaigners who were members of the congress that endorsed the expenditure limits in the federal election campaign act amendments of 1974 concluded that a modest budget would not preclude them from effectively communicating with the electorate, they necessarily rejected the buckley ..... id. , at 55. it decided that the government s primary justification for expenditure limitations, preventing corruption and its appearance, was adequately addressed by the act s contribution limitations and disclosure requirements. ibid. the court also considered other governmental interests advanced in support of expenditure limitations. it rejected each. id. , .....

Clark Vs. Arizona

Court : US Supreme Court

..... quoting speiser, 357 u. s., at 523). * * * the judgment of the court of appeals of arizona is, accordingly, affirmed. it is so ordered. footnote 1 section 13 1105(a)(3) provides that [a] person commits first degree murder if [i]ntending or knowing that the person s conduct will cause death to a law enforcement officer ..... consideration to the mental-illness evidence in making his factual findings as to whether [clark] did or did not act with the state of mind required for a first-degree murder conviction ). an entire section of clark s opening brief argues that the evidence of mental illness should have been considered to rebut the prosecution ..... moral incapacity test (telling right from wrong) does not necessarily require evaluation of a defendant s cognitive capacity to appreciate the nature and quality of the acts charged against him, his argument fails to recognize that cognitive incapacity is itself enough to demonstrate moral incapacity, so that evidence bearing on whether the defendant .....

R. Kalavathi Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2006(6)SC69; 2006(6)SCALE385; (2006)6SCC14

..... quashed on the other ground as submitted by learned counsel for the appellant i.e. absence of materials to show that the detenu was habitually committing offences. section 2(f) of the act reads as follows:xx xx xx xx(f) 'goonda' means a person, who either by himself or as a member of or leader of a ..... senior counsel submitted that at least two documents clearly show that the records were manipulated. additionally, for being labelled as a goonda under the act, the definition of ''goonda' under section 2(f) of the act is relevant. the grounds of detention referred to only one incident and there is no material to show that the detenu was habitually committing ..... tempo of life and public tranquility would be sufficient for detention, being prejudicial to maintenance of public order. for the purpose of the act the detenu has to be a 'goonda' as defined under section 2(f) of the act.8. habitual : the meaning of the words 'habit' and 'habitually' as given in the advanced law lexicon (3rd edn.) by .....

Surendranagar Distt. Panchayat and anr. Vs. Gangaben Laljibhai and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR548]; JT2006(6)SC64; (2006)IIILLJ320SC; 2006(6)SCALE408; (2006)9SCC132; 2007(1)SLJ63(SC)

..... . background facts in a nutshell are as follows:state of gujarat had made a reference to the labour court, surendra nagar under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (in short the 'act')basically on the question whether the alleged termination of the services of the respondents was valid. claim of the respondents was that they ..... worked for various periods for more than 240 days in a year was established and there was non-compliance of the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (in short the 'act') and as such termination was illegal. they were awarded back wages. the writ petitions filed were dismissed and so was the letters ..... was held as follows:analyzing the above decisions of this court, it is clear that the provisions of the evidence act in terms do not apply to the proceedings under section 10 of the industrial disputes act. however, applying general principles and on reading the aforestated judgments, we find that this court has repeatedly taken the .....

M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3366; III(2006)BC433; [2006]132CompCas450(SC); (2006)6CompLJ39(SC); 2006CriLJ4607; 2006(3)CTC730; JT2006(6)SC72; 2006(3)KLT404(SC); 2006(5)MhLj676; 2006MPLJ97(SC);

..... question which arose for consideration therein was as to whether closure of accounts or stoppage of payment is sufficient defence to escape from the penal liability under section 138 of the act. the answer to the question was rendered in the negative. such a question does not arise in the instant case.25. in kundan lal rallaram ..... mr. l. nageswara rao, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is that the trial court and the high court misconstrued and misinterpreted section 139 of the act and furthermore failed to take into consideration the principle of law that once the accused discharges the initial burden placed on him, the burden of ..... petition was filed on 19.11.1992 by the second respondent herein against the appellant purported to be for commission of an offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act (for short 'the act'), on the following allegations:2. the second respondent had been carrying on business of stock and share brokers under the name and .....

Heeralal Yadav Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2535; 2006CriLJ3301; JT2006(6)SC210; 2006(6)SCALE517; (2006)10SCC718

..... .1999 passed in criminal appeal no. 678 of 1995 whereby the high court reversed the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court convicting the respondents for an offence under section 302/34 ipc and sentenced them to ri for life and a fine of rs.1000/- each and in default of payment further six months simple imprisonment. 2. the ..... serious he was referred to district hospital, ujjain, where he succumbed to his injuries. 4. on the basis of the fir, 9 accused faced the trial for an offence under section 302/34 before the trial court. the trial court after examining the evidence on record particularly the evidence of eyewitnesses pw-2 heeralal yadav, pw-3 meharban singh, pw-6 ..... accused respondents namely a-1 gokul singh son of amar singh, a-2 bhawarlal son of ram singh and a-9 badulal son of lal singh for an offence under section 302/34 ipc and acquitted six other accused by giving them benefit of doubt. the high court on appeal by the accused persons reversed the conviction of the trial .....

Subhaga and ors. Vs. Shobha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD78(SC); 2006(3)AWC3132(SC); JT2006(6)SC178; 2006(6)MhLj545; 2007MPLJ221(SC); 2006(II)OLR(SC)778; 2006(6)SCALE598; (2006)5SCC466

..... is challenged in this appeal by the legal representatives of the plaintiff.4. it is contended on behalf of the appellants, that the high court had exceeded its jurisdiction under section 100 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 in interfering with the finding of fact rendered by the courts below that the suit property had been adequately identified and it .....

Pushpa Devi Bhagat (D) Th. Lr. Smt. Sadhna Rai Vs. Rajinder Singh and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2628; 2006(3)AWC3134(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(4)CHN93; [2006(4)JCR30(SC)]; JT2006(6)SC235; (2006)3MLJ258(SC); RLW2006(4)SC2817; 2006(7)SCALE8; (2006)5SCC566

..... making the statement and signed by him, can be said to be not in writing? obviously, no. we may also in this behalf refer to section 3 of the evidence act which defines a document as any matter expressed or described upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks or by more than one of those ..... pursue the application filed before the court, which passed the consent decree. such an appeal by second defendant was not maintainable, having regard to the express bar contained in section 96(3) of the code.re : point no. (ii)13. order xxiii deals with withdrawal and adjustment of suits. rule 3 relates to compromise of suits, relevant ..... therefore, the consequential decree is valid and binding. on the contentions raised, the following two questions arise for consideration:(i) whether the appeal filed by pushpa devi under section 96 of the code of civil procedure, against the consent decree was maintainable. (ii) whether the compromise on 23.5.2001 resulting in a consent decree dated 18.7 .....

Bhupinder Singh and ors. Vs. Jarnail Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2622; 2006CriLJ3621; II(2006)DMC334SC; JT2006(6)SC619; 2006(4)KLT460(SC); 2006(4)MPHT327; 2006(7)SCALE79; (2006)6SCC277

..... dowry death', and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death.explanation.--for the purpose of this sub-section, 'dowry' shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961).(2) whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be ..... 14. in satya narain musadi and ors. v. state of bihar : 1980crilj227 dealing with the section 11 of the essential commodities act, 1955 held as follows:section 11 of the act precludes a court from taking cognizance of the offence punishable under the act except upon a report in writing of the facts constituting such offence made by a person who ..... or 'liable to be punished.10. while dealing with a case relating to punjab borstal act, 1926, this court held that a person convicted under section 302 ipc and sentenced to life imprisonment is not entitled to benefit of section 5 of the said act as offence of murder is punishable with death. (see sube singh and ors. v. .....

H.U.D.A. Vs. Jagmal Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR767]; [2006(4)JCR55(SC)]; (2006)IIILLJ152SC; 2006(7)SCALE114; (2006)5SCC764

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Heard Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. D.P Chaturvedi, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. The above appeal is directed against the order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 5947 of 2003, The Writ Petition filed by the appellant herein was dismissed without assigning any reasons whatsoever.3. The respondent herein was appointed by the appellant as sweeper on daily wages on 01.05.1992. According to the appellant, the respondent had left the service at his own which has been disputed by the learned Counsel for the respondent. The respondent sent a demand notice after a delay of four and a half years through the Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer, Panipat to the appellant asking for reinstatement with continuous service and back wages. The appellant filed reply to the demand notice before the Labour-cum-Conciliation Officer, Panipat putting it clearly that the respondent had not completed 240 days service in ...