Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Year: 1966 Page 3 of about 21 results (0.489 seconds)

Khazansingh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj221

..... vedu, air 1937 bom 55, observed 'but according to my experience of the administration of criminal justice in this presidency, which is not inconsiderable, the courts have always accepted the definition of trial which has been given in (1898) 25 cal 863, that is to say, 'trial' has always been understood to mean the proceeding which commences when the case is ..... considers the charge against the accused to be groundless he shall discharge him. in the case before me the prosecution had not even furnished the documents envisaged by sub-section (1) of section 251-a of the code of criminal procedure. they are to be furnished 'at the commencement of the trial'. the documents having not been furnished, in my opinion, on ..... a magistrate. 6. the question which emerges for consideration before me is whether the case of the applicants is covered by the provisions contained in section 5(1)(a) of the amending act. the material words of section 5(1)(a) on the interpretation of which the answer to this question depends are :'charged with and tried for an offence' which i have ..... applicants urged that the order of the learned special judge is erroneous because he failed to give effect to section 5(1)(a) of the criminal law amendment (amending) act, 1966. mr. mehta for opposite party supported the order of the special judge.4. in order to appreciate the rival contentions of the learned counsel ft is proper to briefly notice the relevant .....