Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: privy council Year: 1949 Page 24 of about 456 results (0.049 seconds)

Rai Surendra Nath and ors. Vs. Sm. Naraini Devi

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All69

..... property. in 1941, the decree was sought to be executed by sale of the property. therefore, ketki kunwar and krishna murari lal filed an application under section 8, debt redemption act for amendment of the decree on the allegation that kanhai lal was an agriculturist when the mortgage of 1920 was executed and they them selves were agriculturists when ..... and descendants in the joint family property'was more or less than rs. 1000. the test laid down in sub-clause (ii) of clause (e) of section 3, debt redemption act, has to be applied in determining whether a 'particular member of the joint family can or cannot be treated as an, agriculturist.' the principle of personal protection ..... undivided member of the family as a separate individual that has to be considered to be an agriculturist for the purpose of qualifying for protection under the terms of section 17 of the act. in view of these decisions of the privy council, the law laid down in khushal kunwar v. zauki ram, 1946 a. l. j. 310: (a. .....

Rukn-ul-mulk Syed Abdul Wajid and ors. Vs. R. Vishwanathan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1950Kant33; AIR1950Mys33

..... plaintiffs, is the one so far dealt, with, and as this line of thinking was accepted by his lordship kandaswami pillai j. though that was due to his acting on the incorrect statement of facts made by the district judge, who could not have been expected to make such incorrect statements. all the same we cannot pass without ..... and his son for releasing such right as they might be demand to have, if any, in the said properties. the settlement as evidenced by this document has been acted upon for nearly four decades and neither devaraj nor plaintiffs or their father are shown to have questioned it. before considering the evidentiary value of what has been stated ..... by his waiving or surrendering his special right in it as separate property. a clear intention to waive separate rights must be established and will not be inferred form acts which may have been done merely from kindness or affection.'it is clear that shanmugam at any rate had at no time conceived the idea of treating his property as .....

Promod Chandra Shekhar Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All546

..... in the manner laid down in the second clause. we are, however, satisfied that that was not the intention of the legislature.9. now if section 3, prevention of corruption act, had done no more than place certain offences in the category of cognizable offences, then theinvestigation of those offences would have been governed by the provisions ..... notes-it is the case for the prosecution that he accepted these notes as a gratification other than legal remuneration, in respect of an official act, and thereby committed an offence punishable? under section 161, penal code. the receipt of the notes is admitted by the applicant, but he says that they were received by him in ..... such facts as are relevant, are set out in the order of reference and need not be repeated.7. section 3, prevention of corruption act, 1947 (ii [2] of 1947), provides that:'3. an offence punishable under section 161 or section 165, penal code, shall be deemed to be a cognizable offence for the purposes of the code of criminal .....

Bisheshwar Dayal Vs. Chandrika Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1950All85

..... from the date on which he discovers the fraud. if within that period he prefers a claim, there can be no question of the drastic consequences mentioned in section 13 of the act following against him.6. this, in our opinion, is sufficient to dispose of the point raised by the learned counsel in support of this appeal. the appellant ..... of fraud having been committed on the decree, holder in such proceedings is that the decree-holder acquires an extended period of limitation to prefer a claim under section 9 of the act. this period may even go beyond 30th november 1939, or the date on which the decrees are sent to the collector for execution. this was held in kishni ..... while affirming the finding of the execution court with regard to the judgment-debtor's fraud, took the view that the debt had in fact got discharged under section 13 of the act and that, therefore, it was not open to the decree-holder to apply for execution of the decree straightway in the civil court.4. the principal question .....

Amir Chand and anr. Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1950P& H53; 1950CriLJ480

..... to bail for treason nor shall such person be admitted to bail except by order of his majesty's secretaries of state.in the criminal appeals act of 1907, (7 edw. vii, chap. 23, section 14(2)) similar words have been used:the court of appeal may, if it thinks fit, on the application of an appellant, admit the ..... the two petitioners were partners of a firm known as the national iron & steel works and that they had been guilty of offences punishable under sections 7 and 10 of the above mentioned act by (1) selling six black sheets of iron to one prem nath. the memorandum signed by prem nath showed that spades and not sheets had ..... the expression 'admit to bail' has been employed in a similar sense, e. g., by b. 5, sub-section (2), coroners act, 1887, coroners may 'admit to bail persons charged with manslaughter,' and by the municipal corporations act, 1882, section 227, a borough constable 'may admit to bail persons charged with petty misdemeanours and brought into his custody.' i cannot .....

Chunna Lal Vs. Governor General in Council Through the Secretary Railw ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1950All89

orderseth, j.1. this is a plaintiff's application in revision under section 25, provincial small cause courts act. the plaintiff sent five consignments of green chillies from mathura to ahmedabad. the consignee were messrs. lalobhai chhagan lal. the consignments were not delivered by the railway company to the .....

Deputy Commissioner Vs. Upendra Saran Sanyal and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... speeches delivered at the meeting amount to contempt of a 'court' within the meaning of the expression as used in the contempt of courts act, under section 2 (1) of the act this court has the same power to punish contempts of courts subordinate to it as it has of punishing contempts of its own authority. the ..... .22. the proceedings are again admittedly non-judicial even if the sub-deputy collector's. bona fide believed that he was acting under the regulation. chapter vir, land eevenue manual contains rules framed under sections 129,152 and 155 (b) and (c)rule is provides that the provisions of the civil procedure code and all enactments amending the ..... investigate and report on matters which coma before him in his capacity as a eevenue officer acting under the regulation. the deputy commissioner when directing the sub-deputy collector to enquire and report did not purport to act under this section.24. section 142 of the regulation punishes failure to comply with a notice served on a person .....

Mt. Sajida Khatoon Vs. M.B. Ahmad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1950All56

..... and that a further ad valorem court-fee is payable oil this amount of rs. 13,200. the finding of the court is based on the ground that section 7 (ii) (a), u. p. court-fees act, read with the proviso to it, is applicable to the present case.4. it is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that this ..... no force in this contention.5. section 7 (ii) (a), u. p. court-fees act is, divisible into two portions. the first portion, describes the nature of the suit to which it, applies; the second portion describes the method in which the subject-matter ..... section does not apply to the present case, and that the court-fee is payable in accordance with article 17 (vi) of schedule ii, court-fees act, because, the learned counsel contends, this relief is incapable of valuation. in my opinion, there is .....

Santosh Kumari Lalchand Mehra Vs. Chimanlal Munilal Kapur

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1950Bom307; (1950)52BOMLR394

..... father who was her next friend, could maintain this petition. i drew the attention of the learned counsel for the respondent to the provisions of section 49, divorce act which he had himself resorted to in the first instance for urging before me that the petition was not maintainable having been filed before the next ..... very clear in terms and they lay down a condition or conditions for the valid solemnization of marriages between the parsis governed by the act. similarly sections 2 and 17, special marriage act, 1872, which are clear and categoric in terms leave not the slightest doubt in my mind that what the legislature intended was the ..... conclusion of mine, i respectfully differ from the learned judges who constitute0d that special bench, and i am of opinion that the provisions contained in section 2, special marriage act, 1872, are not directory in character but are mandatory and they prescribe the conditions for the proper and valid solemnization of marriage between the parties .....

Udipi Municipal Council Represented by Its Commissioner, T. Harichandr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad222

..... pasture lands must be considered to be lands used solely 'for agricultural purposes' within the meaning of section 63, madras district municipalities act of 1884 as amended in 1897 which was then in force. the language of section 81 (4) of the act is similar and applies to land used 'exclusive for agricultural purposes.' if a piece of urban vacant ..... : a. i. r. 1924 p. c. 247, it was held that a mango tope was not land used for agricultural purposes within the meaning of section 79, agra tenancy act, 1901. 'agriculture' in its ordinary and primary sense implies the tillage or cultivation of the soil by human effort with or without the aid of animal or ..... limits of the municipality. the defendants, here respondents, resist the claim on the grounds that they should: have been assessed to property tax under section 81 (i) of the act and not under section 81 (3) and they should have been separately and individually assessed on the share of the property held by each of them. their contentions .....