Court : Patna
Decided on : Dec-21-2006
..... district judge - cum - motor vehicle accident claims tribunal, katihar whereby he has been pleased to dismiss the claim application of the appellants filed under section 166 of the motor vehicles act on the ground that the deceased was an unauthorised passenger and was trying to take lift in the offending tractor when the tractor met accident.2. ..... judgment of the tribunal it appears that the tribunal refused to grant any relief to the applicants and dismissed the application filed by them under section 166 of the motor vehicle act on the ground that the deceased was an unauthorised pass and was trying to take lift in the offending tractor when the said tractor ..... deceased's family was of labourer and therefore, in my view, figure '11' will be the best suitable multiplier in this case as per schedule appended with motor vehicle act. thus, figure '11' is taken as best suitable multiplier in this case. now the compensation will be calculated in the following manner: monthly loss - 900 annual .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Dec-22-2006
..... or rejecting the same could have been done only by the board as is also the requirement of law as per the provisions of the bihar state madarsa education board act, hence, there was no justification for the chairman of the board to pass such an order (annexure-4) himself either withdrawing temporary approval or appointing respondent no. 5 for six .....
Tag this Judgment!