Court : Mumbai Goa
..... kept in the plot no.l-2 some of which was open to air and rain apparently attracting the provisions of section 16 read with section 15 of the environment (protection) act, 1986 and section 269 ipc while declining to quash the fir. all these judgments are clearly distinguishable and cannot substantiate the case of the ..... prescribed permissible limits for drinking water and accordingly giving rise to the report against the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 269 ipc and section 16 read with section 15 of the environment (protection) act, 1986. 17. in nazeem (supra), this court while dealing with the petition considered whether the contents of the fir ..... which a person in good faith believes himself to have a lawful right to obstruct, is not an offence within the meaning of this section. section 341 ipc reads thus:- section 341. punishment for wrongful restraint-whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... form prescribed. in the present case, it is not disputed that in fact the petitioner submitted such application in the form prescribed on 08.03.2013. sub-section (2) of section 32 of the revenue code provides that the collector has to acknowledge the receipt of such application within seven days. but, however, in the present case, ..... out that whilst assessing the amount of conversion fees payable by the petitioner, such fees were assessed on the basis of the goa land revenue code (amendment) act 2013 which came to be published in the official gazette dated 22.05.2013 whereby the fees were substantially increased depending upon the categories such as residential, commercial ..... between the parties and ultimately on 19.09.2013, the deputy collector directed the petitioner to deposit conversion fees as per the goa land revenue code (amendment) act 2013. the petitioner thereafter requested the deputy collector on 24.09.2013 to amend the memorandum dated 13.08.2013 so as to include the open space of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... upon, more so, when oral evidence cannot help the court when it is in the form of words against words by rival parties. considering the implication of section 83 of the indian evidence act, presumption can be drawn in respect of map or plan drawn by competent public official in such cases so as to resolve the controversy between the arties. it .....
Tag this Judgment!