Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-20-2006
Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ815
..... acquiring such land should not be allowed to take any advantage of such ignorance of the agriculturists. once an application is moved for making a reference under section 18 of the act it becomes the duty of the collector to send full information to the court regarding the entire land acquired and it is thereafter the duty of the court ..... making the reference the collector was required to state for the information of the court the particulars as mentioned in clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of section 19 of the act. thus it was the duty of the collector to mention not only the situation and extent of land but even particulars of any trees, buildings or standing ..... at the cost of the claimant....5. in ram kumar and ors. v. union of india and ors. : [1991]1scr649 , the supreme court held thus:under section 18 of the act the only requirement for the person interested who had not accepted the award was to move a written application to the collector requiring that the matter be referred for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-21-2006
Reported in : (2007)IILLJ995Ker
..... . 26,971/- for the period from october 1990 to december 1998. the appellant paid those amounts later. proceedings were initiated on september 27, 1999 under section 39(5) of the act to realise interest on the contribution for the period from september 1, 1990 to december 31, 1998. challenging that order, the appellant filed i.c. no ..... however, while disposing of the o.p., a direction was issued that the petitioners in the o.p. may approach the employees' insurance court under section 75 of the employees state insurance act for appropriate reliefs against the notices impugned in the o.p. the e.s.i. corporation was directed to keep in abeyance all proceedings pursuant to ..... march 7, 1995. the contention raised by the appellant herein that hotels and restaurants do not fall within the purview of the definition of factory under section 2(12) of the employees state insurance act was repelled in the light of the decision of the supreme court in g.l. hotels limited v. t.c. sarin : (1994)iillj883sc .....
Tag this Judgment!