Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka kalaburagi Page 6 of about 168 results (0.095 seconds)

Jun 22 2016 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr Vs. shri.siddeshwar

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... 586 101 pan: aaaat380if appellants8 respondent (shri g. venkatesh, advocate for shri a. shankar, advocate) this income tax appeal is filed under section 260a of the income tax act, praying to formulate the substantial question of law stated above. allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the income tax appellate tribunal ..... sindagi, bijapur 586 101 pan: aaaat380if (shri g. venkatesh, advocate for shri a. shankar, advocate) respondent7this income tax appeal is filed under section 260a of the income tax act, praying to formulate the substantial question of law stated above. allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the income tax appellate ..... bijapur 586 101. pan: aaaas4391p (shri g. venkatesh, advocate for shri a. shankar, advocate) respondent this income tax appeal is filed under section 260a of the income tax act, praying to formulate the substantial question of law stated above. allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the income tax appellate tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2016 (HC)

Girish and Others Vs. Champabai and Others

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... . it is that which is under challenge in the present appeals. 3. it is contended by the learned counsel for the appellants that the trial court has overlooked section 58 of the evidence act, 1872, namely that a fact which is admitted need not be proved. as the plaintiff had admitted the defence taken by the defendants in their written statement in ..... (prayer: this regular first appeal is filed under section 96 of civil procedure code, against the judgment and decree dated 01.07.2014, passed in original suit old no. 26/2007 new no. 61/2011 on the file of the senior .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2016 (HC)

Girish S/O Late Vithalrao Kulkarni and Ors Vs. Champabai W/O Late Ra ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... . it is that which is under challenge in the present appeals.3. it is contended by the learned counsel for the appellants that the trial court has overlooked section 58 of the evidence act, 1872, namely that a fact which is admitted need not be proved. as the plaintiff had admitted the defence taken by the defendants in their written statement in ..... no.1, shri ashok s. kinagi, advocate for respondents no.2 to 6 shri r.s. sidhapurkar, advocate for respondents no.7 &8) this regular first appeal is filed under section 96 of civil procedure code, against the judgment and decree dated 01.07.2014, passed in original suit old no.26/2007 new no.61/2011 on the file of the senior ..... no.1, shri ashok s. kinagi, advocate for respondents no.2 to 6 shri r.s. sidhapurkar, advocate for respondents no.7 &8) this regular first appeal is filed under section 96 of civil procedure code, against the judgment and decree dated 01.07.2014, passed in original suit old no.26/2007 new no.61/2011 on the file of the senior .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2016 (HC)

Mallappa @ Mallikarjun S/O Revanappa Pujari Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... up accused persons in prosecution of their common object have intentionally threatened the deceased sanjeevkumar to take away his life and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 506 read with section 149 of the ipc?.5. whether the prosecution further proves beyond all reasonable doubt that on the above said date, time and place, the accused ..... the manner in which the murder had 17 been committed, the inconsistency in not having mentioned the name of accused no.6 to whom a particular overt act is attributed, is indeed inexplicable and was clearly an afterthought. this becomes evident from the fact that the first information report itself is registered a full twelve ..... if they were available before and after the incident, when their identity was clearly noticed by pws.12 and 13 and their acts were also noticed by them and if they continued to act normally, it is contrary to normal human behaviour and especially a person who has committed a serious crime and such conduct would .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2016 (HC)

Malappa @ Mallikarjun Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep by Additional St ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... accused persons in prosecution of their common object have intentionally insulted deceased sanjeevkumar by abusing him in filthy language and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 504 read with section 149 of the ipc? 4. whether the prosecution further proves beyond all reasonable doubt that on the above said date time and place, accused persons ..... witnessed the manner in which the murder had been committed, the inconsistency in not having mentioned the name of accused no.6 to whom a particular overt act is attributed, is indeed inexplicable and was clearly an afterthought. this becomes evident from the fact that the first information report itself is registered a full ..... if they were available before and after the incident, when their identity was clearly noticed by pws.12 and 13 and their acts were also noticed by them and if they continued to act normally, it is contrary to normal human behaviour and especially a person who has committed a serious crime and such conduct .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

Additional Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburgi Vs. B ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .no.7 to 18 of property register for which they have not produced relevant records for possession of the same and thereby committed the offence punishable under section 98 of the karnataka police act? 8. whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that, accused no.5 abetted/instigated accused nos.1 to 4 to commit robbery/dacoity and murder in ..... apex court has observed thus:- this takes us to the question of sentence. it may in this connection be pointed out that after the amendment of section 367(5), cr. p.c., by act 26 of 1955, the discretion of the court in deciding whether to impose the sentence of death or of imprisonment for life has become wider. the ..... any punishment other than death, the reason why sentence of death was not passed had to be stated in the judgment. after the amendment of section 367(5) of the old code by act 26 of 1955, position is clear that the normal penalty is imprisonment for life. it can be awarded in the presence of extenuating circumstances which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2016 (HC)

The Additional Registrar General Vs. Basavaraj @ Basya & Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... .7 to 18 of property register for which they have not produced 13 relevant records for possession of the same and thereby committed the offence punishable under section 98 of the karnataka police act?.8. whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that, accused no.5 abetted/instigated accused nos.1 to 4 to commit robbery/dacoity and murder in ..... court has observed thus:- 34 this takes us to the question of sentence. it may in this connection be pointed out that after the amendment of section 367(5), cr. p.c., by act 26 of 1955, the discretion of the court in deciding whether to impose the sentence of death or of imprisonment for life has become wider. the ..... to any punishment other than death, the reason why sentence of death was not passed had to be stated in the judgment. after the amendment of section 367(5) of the old code by act 26 of 1955, position is clear that the normal penalty is imprisonment for life. it can be awarded in the presence of extenuating circumstances which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2016 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs. M/s. Bahubali Neminath ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... rejected the books and had invoked the provisions of section 145 (3) of the i.t. act. the assessing officer estimated the income by applying the gross profit rate of 7.43% on the unaccounted sales over and above the ..... other hand shri ashok kulkarni, the learned counsel appearing for the assessee respondent, would submit that in the assessment proceedings that followed the search under section 132 of the i.t. act, the assessing officer had found that the books of accounts of the assessee were not reliable. therefore, after considering the respondent s explanation had ..... had accurately added the unaccounted purchases and the gross profit on suppressed sales. therefore, the tribunal ought to have noted the addition made under section 69b of the i.t. act would have no bearing on the estimation of profit on suppressed sales. it is contended that the tribunal was also in error in holding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2016 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Bahubali Neminath Muttin

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... rejected the books and had invoked the provisions of section 145 (3) of the i.t. act. the assessing officer estimated the income by applying the gross 10 profit rate of 7.43% on the unaccounted sales over and above ..... other hand shri ashok kulkarni, the learned counsel appearing for the assessee respondent, would submit that in the assessment proceedings that followed the search under section 132 of the i.t. act, the assessing officer had found that the books of accounts of the assessee were not reliable. therefore, after considering the respondent s explanation had ..... post chandachan taluk indi, district bijapur 586 205. (shri ashok kulkarni & shri k.r. prasad, advocates) respondent3this income tax appeal is filed under section 260a of the income-tax act, 1961 against order passed in income tax appeal no.164/pnj/2010 dated 08-06-2011 on the file of the income tax appellate tribunal, panaji .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2016 (HC)

Anusuya and Another Vs. Mallayya

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... being effected on an application made by the plaintiff himself and therefore he was estopped from contending otherwise to defeat the right which is absolutely protected under section 14 of the hs act. consequently, the substantial question of law is answered in favour of the appellants and both the courts below were wrong in their conclusions that the sale ..... to reconcile the same with the judgments of the courts below. in this endeavour, it is necessary to first take note of the language and tenor of section 14 of the hs act: 14. property of a female hindu to be her absolute property.- (1) any property possessed by a female hindu, whether acquired before or after the ..... way of maintenance it would amount to mere recognition of a pre-existing right or a conferment of a new title so as to fall squarely within section 14(2) of the 1956 act. after noticing the divergence of judicial opinion on the subject, where various high courts had taken contrary views on this point, the court has proceeded .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //