Array ( [0] => ..... 2) and subsequent memorandum dated november 26, 1991 (annexure p-5) which has been challenged in this writ petition is the executive committee contemplated in section 30 of 'the act'. section 50 authorizes central board in consultation with the reserve bank and with the previous sanction of the central government to make regulations not inconsistent with 'the ..... the rules and the bank cannot abrogate its functions to outside authority on the basis of said guidelines not in conformity to the provisions of section 18 of the act. the learned counsel next contended that the special area allowance was paid to the members of the petitioners association on the basis of settlement between ..... central board of directors of the state bank of india was abolished by the executive committee without jurisdiction and ultra vires of the provisions made under section 43 of the act;(b) hill and fuel allowance has been abolished retrospectively w.e.f. january 1, 1990 though the same was drawn by the members of ..... [1] => ..... cases particularly when neither the owner nor the driver came forward to contest and resist the claim of the claimants as also leave to contest under section 170 of the motor vehicles act having been granted in favour of the appellant, compensation should have been payable by owner and driver of the bus and not by the appellant ..... was recorded that he has no objection to the same being allowed. but there is no order to that effect, whereas order allowing the application under section 170 of the motor vehicles act, is there in the case of raj kumari and others. both cases were consolidated as is evident from the record of the tribunal.4. at ..... submitted that when both these cases were pending before the learned tribunal below his client was permitted to contest the claim of the respondents-claimants under section 170 of the motor vehicles act. record of case of geeta devi and others, shows that application had been filed, and also a statement of learned counsel for the respondents-claimants ..... ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Old - Court Himachal Pradesh - Year 2003 - Page 2 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: himachal pradesh Year: 2003 Page 2 of about 12 results (0.029 seconds)

Nov 24 2003 (HC)

Sbi Officers Association Vs. Chief General Manager, Sbi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Reported in : (2004)IIILLJ169HP

..... 2) and subsequent memorandum dated november 26, 1991 (annexure p-5) which has been challenged in this writ petition is the executive committee contemplated in section 30 of 'the act'. section 50 authorizes central board in consultation with the reserve bank and with the previous sanction of the central government to make regulations not inconsistent with 'the ..... the rules and the bank cannot abrogate its functions to outside authority on the basis of said guidelines not in conformity to the provisions of section 18 of the act. the learned counsel next contended that the special area allowance was paid to the members of the petitioners association on the basis of settlement between ..... central board of directors of the state bank of india was abolished by the executive committee without jurisdiction and ultra vires of the provisions made under section 43 of the act;(b) hill and fuel allowance has been abolished retrospectively w.e.f. january 1, 1990 though the same was drawn by the members of .....

Tag this Judgment!
Dec 15 2003 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Raj Kumari and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2003

Reported in : 2004ACJ1100

..... cases particularly when neither the owner nor the driver came forward to contest and resist the claim of the claimants as also leave to contest under section 170 of the motor vehicles act having been granted in favour of the appellant, compensation should have been payable by owner and driver of the bus and not by the appellant ..... was recorded that he has no objection to the same being allowed. but there is no order to that effect, whereas order allowing the application under section 170 of the motor vehicles act, is there in the case of raj kumari and others. both cases were consolidated as is evident from the record of the tribunal.4. at ..... submitted that when both these cases were pending before the learned tribunal below his client was permitted to contest the claim of the respondents-claimants under section 170 of the motor vehicles act. record of case of geeta devi and others, shows that application had been filed, and also a statement of learned counsel for the respondents-claimants .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //