Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: guwahati Year: 2006 Page 11 of about 102 results (0.055 seconds)

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

National Plywood Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

..... paid by the petitioner company under rule 9(2) read with section 11(a) of the act ande) a penalty should not be imposed under the provision of the sub-rule 1 of rule 173 q of ..... the differential duty should not be demanded from the paid by the petitioner company under rule 9(2) read with section 11(a) of the act;d) central excise duty amounting to rs. 61,711.27 being the differential duty should not be demanded from the ..... .01 passed by the commissioner of central excise, shillong confirming the demand made in terms of the provision of section 11(a)(2) of central excise act, 1944 and in addition imposing the penalty of rs. 2,50,000/- in terms of the provision of ..... sunil gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended that the remedy before the tribunal under the u.p. public service tribunal act is wholly illusory inasmuch as the tribunal has no power to grant an interim order. therefore, he contends that the high court ought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

State/Cbi (Spe) Vs. Subrate Bhattacharjee and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

..... the knowledge of al, the learned trial court ought to have attempted to ascertain if al could be held guilty of offences under section 420 and 13(1)(d), read with section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, for, the fact that forgery was committed is an admitted fact and that the amounts have been fraudulently withdrawn is, again, ..... , 420, 468, 465 and 471 ipc. by this impugned judgment and order, al was also acquitted of the charge framed against him under section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act. aggrieved by the acquittal of the two accused-respondents, the state has preferred the present appeal.2. i have heard mr. d.k. ..... following the complaint and treating the same as first information report, the c.b.i, registered a case under sections 120 b/420/468/471 ipc and under section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act. during the course of investigation, 'the c.b.i, seized a number of documents and got many of these .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //