Court : DRAT Allahabad
Reported in : I(2008)BC24
..... form its own opinion on the basis of the entire evidence brought on record. the court also would be competent to compare the signatures and the writings under section 73 of the evidence act.in this very ruling the mention had been made with regard to opinion of expert based on glaring similarities. another ruling panchula v.ganeshilal maheshwari , wherein in para .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : DRAT Allahabad
Reported in : IV(2007)BC1
..... the section 72 of contract act.ruling bank of baroda v. indochem and varnish industries ii (2006) b.c.56 (d.r.a.t./d.r.t.), decided by this tribunal, sowdra bai v ..... under mistake, sri sri shiva prasad singh (deceased), now represented by kali prasad singha v. maharaja srish chandra nandi air (36) 1949 p.c. 297, deal with section 72 of the contract act. both have no application in the instant case. learned counsel for both the parties have cited jammu and kashmir bank ltd. v. attar-ul-nisa , which deals with ..... as in that suit the appellants are only proforma defendants.8. having heard the counsel for both the sides, let us examine the definition of debt provided under section 2(g) of the act. this definition is as under: "debt" means any liability (inclusive of interest) which is claimed as due from any person by a bank or a financial .....
Tag this Judgment!