Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: delhi Year: 2006 Page 10 of about 411 results (0.050 seconds)

Mar 10 2006 (HC)

R.G. Desai and Associates (P) Vs. Sh. Sunil Dev

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)ARBLR463(Delhi); 2006(89)DRJ463; (2006)144PLR43

..... .11.2004, it was made clear that the award would be impugned under the grounds available to the petitioner in terms of the provisions of section 30 of the 1940 act. section 30 of the said act reads as under :-30. grounds for setting aside award. an award shall not be set aside except on one or more of the following grounds ..... in the context of section 30 of the 1940 act, the court exercises a very limited jurisdiction. this is, particularly so, when the award is a non-speaking award and the arbitrator has not disclosed his ..... the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in the case of a non-speaking award, it is well settled that the court exercising its jurisdiction under section 30 of the 1940 act can only interfere with the award if the arbitrator has misconducted himself or the proceeding or there existed an error apparent on the face of the award. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2006 (TRI)

Western Union Financial Services Vs. Additional Director of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Reported in : (2007)104ITD40(Delhi)

..... there may not be any liability under the indian law, unless there are other specific provisions as for royalty, technical fees, interest and salary as provided under section 9 of. the act. where there is no liability under the indian law, there is no need for considering the further question, whether the same set of facts could justify the ..... . (a) there was no business connection in india at all, so that the profits, if any, attributable to the indian operations could be brought to tax under section 9 of the it act. (b) as regards the dtaa, considerable arguments were advanced to deny the existence of any pe in india within the meaning of article 5. the lo, it ..... assessee. there is supervision of the transaction through the employees of the assessee. thus there is "business connection" in india and the assessee is liable under section 9(1) of the it act to pay income-tax on the profits arising from its activities in india. (b) that the assessee is also liable to tax in india under the dtaa .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2006 (HC)

Sh. Madhu Vijayan and anr. Vs. Sh. S.G. Ravishankar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ217

..... . one is is no. 3054/2005 under order xxxix rule 3 cpc seeking vacation of the exparte injunction. second application is crl.m. no. 4066/2005 under section 340 of the cr.p.c. alleging that the plaintiffs have made false statements and have committed perjury for which they should be prosecuted. notice in these two applications ..... no. 2. sustenance is also sought to be drawn from the provisions of the transplantation of human organs act, 1994 by contending that it is in pari materia with the case at hand in these proceedings. section 5 of the said act recognizes only the right of the 'near relatives' of the deceased to claim dead bodies. 'near relative' ..... has been defined in section 2(i) as 'spouse, son, daughter, father, mother, brother or sister'. 21. learned senior counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2006 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Apollo Tyres Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2006

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Delhi)15

..... revenue, if they are so aggrieved, could challenge order of special bench through a writ petition before the high court. he maintained that tribunal under section 254(2) of it act had no jurisdiction to rectify the mistake.7. in rebuttal, the learned departmental representative controverted various submissions made by shri sharma, the learned counsel on ..... question is considered and decided by the special bench in the process of "disposing" an appeal, any order passed by the special bench is order under section 254 of the it act. it is part and parcel of the order disposing of appeal. therefore, order passed by the special bench, if it contains mistake apparent from record ..... , can be rectified under section 254(2) of the it act. having regard to the scheme of disposal of appeals by the tribunal, we do not see any impediment in the special bench rectifying apparent mistake .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2006 (TRI)

Spl Siddhartha Ltd. and Shri N.K. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2006

..... industries ltd. and ors. v. c.c.e. and ors. 8. the test commonly applied to such cases is: how is the product identified by the class or section of people dealing with or using the product? that is a test which is attracted whenever the statute does not contain any definition. porritts and spencer (asia) ltd. v ..... regarded as falling more accurately under the entry relating to "hospital equipment and apparatus" rather than under the entry which related to "glasswares" in the u.p. sales tax act.12. the rival tariff headings in question do not specifically mention the product or define the product. both headings are general in nature, 'of plastics' and 'of textile ..... and ors. . the question whether thermometers, lactometers, syringes, eye-wash glasses and measuring glasses could be described as 'glassware' for the purpose of the orissa sales tax act, 1947 was answered by the orissa high court in state of orissa v. janta medical stores (1976) 37 stc 33 in the negative. to the same effect is the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2006 (HC)

Jai Prakash Gupta Vs. Suraiya Begum and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-14-2006

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT613; 2006(88)DRJ370

..... 2004 has disposed of issues no. 4 and 5 holding that the premises in question does not fall within the definition of 'premises ' as defined under section 2(i) of the delhi rent control act, 1958 and, thereforee, the court has jurisdiction to try the suit. cm(m) 317/2004 (page 1 of 5)2. it is contended by ..... petitioner that both the issues (i) whether the suit premises falls within the definition of premises as defined under section 2(i) of the delhi rent control act, 1958. ii) whether the suit is barred by section 50 of the said act as alleged are issues that can be decided only after evidence has been led. these issues cannot be adjudicated ..... was given with constructions and tanks and, thereforee, the premises falls within the definition of 'premises'of section 2(i) of the delhi rent control act. in terms of the present form, the suit is, thereforee, barred under section 50 of the act.7. having heard learned counsel for the parties and with their assistance i have gone through the record .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2006 (HC)

Shri Brijesh Sharma Vs. the Liquidator, Super Bazar, the Co-operative ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ497

..... advertised or prescribed. the second significant factor which has to be kept in mind is that the pharmacy council has to follow the procedure prescribed under the pharmacy act under section 36 to remove any member's name from the register. nothing on record suggests that such procedure was followed.21. i am of the view that the mere ..... his basic educational qualification certificate and that the delhi pharmacy council by its letter dated 28.4.1999 informed super bazar that under section 32 of the pharmacy act, no person was entitled to be registered as a pharmacist in the register unless he had passed a metriculation examination or an examination equivalent to it. ..... the petitioner was issued with a certificate dated 3.5.1978 by the delhi pharmacy council as per form-f under rule 65(1) read with section 32b of the pharmacy act, 1948 (hereafter 'the act') as amended, in 1976.4. on 3.3.2000, a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner alleging that he had failed to submit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2006 (HC)

Ch. Ranjit Singh Vs. Ito

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Reported in : [2006]7SOT151(NULL)

..... on loan was in the record of the assessing officer and this ought not to have been ignored in determining income chargeable to tax under section 149 of the act. if this had not been ignored, the amount would not have been exceeded rs. 25,000, le., the maximum amount not chargeable to tax. that ..... the question arising for consideration here is as to whether the assessing officer needed to go only into considering deductions prima facie available to the assessed under section 24(1) of the act, i.e., deduction allowable towards repairs. the case of the assessed is that as on 30-3-1999, the stand of the assessed regarding interest ..... according to the learned counsel, it is such income which has to be computed - there is no other choice. this also gathers support from explanation 2 to section 147 of the act, which deems certain cases where 'income chargeable to tax' has escaped assessment. as per the learned counsel, this provision also makes it clear that it is income .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2006 (HC)

Shree Digvijay Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. the State Trading Corporation of In ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi276; III(2006)BC405; 2006(2)CTLJ34(Del); 128(2006)DLT319; 2006(89)DRJ207

..... defendant is concerned, the findings on issue nos. 1 & 2 has shown that the relationship of the parties is of a principal and agent. section 222 of the said act mandates that if any loss is suffered by the agent, the principal would indemnify the same. this is so since a contract of agency is different ..... they have professed to disclaim it. it was held that agency is consensual and not contractual. for creating a contract of agency in view of section 185 of the said act even passing of consideration is not necessary.34. learned counsel for the defendant emphasized the fact that a reference to the documents would show that the ..... granted subject to certain terms and conditions.31. learned counsel for the plaintiff referred to chapter 10 of the indian contract act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as the said act), which deals with agency. learned counsel referred to the provisions of sections 182, 185, 186, 187, 188 & 222. the said provisions read as under:182. 'agent' and 'principal' defined. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2006 (TRI)

Anupam Synthetics (P) Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Delhi)119

..... payment only for services rendered by mr. vakil during the course of business operations and for business activities and therefore the deduction for business promotion was allowable under section 37 of the act. in support of his argument the learned counsel placed reliance on the decision reported in cit v. navsan cotton and silk mills ; cit v. indian cements ..... facts and is illegal.10.1. the learned cit(a)has adjudicated the issue by observing as under: regarding the disallowance of deduction of rs. 31,288 under section 80g, the ao has added the donation claimed at rs. 69,091 in the computation of income. however, during the course of appellate proceedings, the appellant has ..... of commission of rs. 12,54,388. he, thus, held that in absence of evidence to establish that the commission was paid for business purpose, the deduction under section 37 could not be allowed. in reaching to this conclusion he relied upon the decisions in the cases of swadeshi cotton mills co.ltd. v. cit ; and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //