Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: delhi Page 19 of about 18,978 results (0.297 seconds)

Thomas Cook (India) Limited Vs. Hotel Imperial and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT431; 2006(88)DRJ545

..... compensated by award of damages. it cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be said that a person in settled possession, though unlawful, is not entitled to the protection under section 6 of the act. maintenance of law and order, and enthusing confidence in the efficacy of rule of law are condition precedent for orderly society. thereforee, giving primacy, legitimacy or legality to ..... aggressor or mighty would trample upon the rights of the weak and meek and denial of relief under section 6 would put a premium upon the aggression or treachery or tricks. no doubt long delay in disposal of cases due to docket explosion became a ruse to unscrupulous litigant to abuse the due course of law to protract litigation and remain in .....

NitIn Nagpal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ745

..... same in evidence without any formal proof thereof. the following are the government scientific experts mentioned in sub-section (4) of section 293.(a) any chemical examiner or assistant chemical examiner to government;(b) the chief inspector of explosives;(c) the director of the finger print bureau;(d) the director, haffkeine institute, bombay;(e) the ..... statement of one injured had not been recorded; (2) the central forensic science laboratory report had not been obtained/not filed; (3) sanction under section 39 of the arms act, 1959 had not been obtained/not filed. submissions were made at length with regard to whether the challan was complete or incomplete and the same ..... the substance seized was ganja or not. and, the chemical analyser's report would determine whether the provisions of the narcotic drug and psychotropic substances act 1985 were attracted or not. the court held that in such a situation the magistrate undoubtedly could not proceed to take cognizance of the offence in .....

Lt. Col. (Retd.) S.J. Chaudhri Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 131(2006)DLT376

..... flat at 98, sunder nagar, new delhi by way of a parcel bomb resulting in the registration of a case against him under section 302 ipc and sections 3, 4 and 6 of the explosive substances act bearing case no. rc-3/83. the said case was pending in the court of ms.mamta sehgal, additional sessions judge posted at ..... on the administrative side which is under challenge in this petition.6. in the course of arguments, the principal ground for assailing the order under challenge was that section 407 of code of criminal procedure circumscribes the power of the high court to transfer criminal cases and appeals and the same contemplates issuance of notice to the accused ..... by the earlier additional sessions judge, the same cannot be sustained in view of the fact that the successor judge stands empowered in view of the provisions of section 326 of the code of criminal procedure to try the case on the evidence recorded by his predecessor.7. having carefully considered both the aforesaid decisions, we are .....

The State Vs. Mohd. Hussain

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT428

..... bodies of their relatives who had died in the bomb blast. pw-64 shri r.c.meena proved the sanction for the prosecution of the accused under section 7 of the explosive substances act, 1908.37. this much is the main evidence of the prosecution relied upon by the prosecution. other witnesses examined were of formal nature and their ..... by confirming the death sentence imposed on the appellant mohd. hussain and the appeal filed by him for setting aside his conviction under sections 302/307 ipc and also under section 3 of the explosive substances act and the sentences imposed upon him vide judgment dated 26-10-04 and order on sentence dated 03-11-04 in sessions case no ..... jehad. on 27-02-98 itself the police had registered a case vide fir no. 49 of 1998 under sections 121/121a ipc and sections 3, 4 & 5 of the explosive substances act as well as under section 25 of the arms act at main delhi railway station. on the basis of information provided by the apprehended terrorists the police made more .....

Mohd. Aamir Khan Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 138(2007)DLT759

..... and one mohd. shakeel who was allegedly making the bomb and had supplied the same to mohd. amir khan. charges were framed under sections 302/307/436 ipc and section 3 of the explosive substances act against the appellant only while his co-accused was discharged.4. the substratum of the allegations against the appellant are that on 26. ..... 23.4.2003 and order of sentence dated 8.5.2003 passed by the additional sessions judge, delhi, convicting and sentencing the appellant under sections 302/307/436 ipc and section 3 of the explosive substances act in sessions case no. 104 of 1998 arising out of fir no. 631 of 1997, police station karol bagh, new delhi.2. ..... was seated on the seat beneath which a blast occurred after he vacated the same. this evidence, in no way, holds the appellant responsible for planting of the explosive substance which detonated subsequently. suspicion, howsoever strong it may be, does not take place of evidence. he also submitted that the appellant was arrested in case fir .....

Mohd. Akbar Butt Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 138(2007)DLT43; 2006(91)DRJ242

..... mohd. akbar butt has been found guilty. they have been along with mohd. akbar butt charged for the commission of the offence punishable under section 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908. the findings of the trial court against accused- appellant shahnawaj latif and his brother shahid latif are contained in para nos. 59 ..... appeal no. 303 of 2004 of appellant mohd. akbar butt partly by setting aside his conviction under section 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908. his conviction and punishment imposed on him under section 4 read with section 5 of the said act, however, stand confirmed. crl. appeal no. 552 of 2003 of appellants shahnawaj latif and shahid latif ..... the court of sessions. learned additional sessions judge framed a charge for the offence punishable under section 6 of the explosive substances act against all the three accused. a separate charge under section 4 read with section 5 of the act of 1908 was also framed against accused mohd. akbar butt for his having been found in .....

R.D. Bohet S/O Sh. Bhoop Singh, Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi, Govt. of Nc ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... many of whom are under trials with previous convictions, convicts involved in murder rape and other heinous offences convicts involved in offences under the arms act and explosive act as also the ndps act and further tada and pota under trials, dangerous prisoners like those involved in the attack on parliament on 13th december 2001 and other death sentence ..... though the ccs (cca) rules, 1965 have not taken enough provisions and stringent measures to call for the presence yet under the commission of inquiries act, 1952, section 4 provides as a power of commission to summon and enforce the attendance of any person from any part of india to depose on oath, failing ..... authority has given detailed and cogent reasons for arriving at a decision in this regard. the order is based on violation of the provisions of section 9 of the delhi prisons act, 2000 that provides that the officers (of the jail) shall not have business dealings with the prisoners. the disciplinary authority has clarified that .....

Aditya Cement Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)(116)ECC552

..... avail cenvat credit. the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under sub-heading 2502.29 and 2502.10 of central excise tariff act, 1985.they availed cenvat credit on explosives which are used in mines.3. ld. advocate on behalf of the appellant submits that this issue is already decided by the hon'ble supreme court in .....

Abdul Gafoor Vs. State of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(94)DRJ287

..... the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant and has no hesitation in concluding that the impugned sentence awarded by the trial court under section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 by sentencing the appellant to undergo ri for 14 years cannot be sustained. the rigorous imprisonment could not be for more than five ..... in case the plea of learned asg that transportation for 14 years be read as imprisonment for 14 years is accepted, there would be incongruity in section 5 of explosive substances act, 1908 inasmuch as it would provide imprisonment for 14 years as well as 5 years without any classification as to for which category which punishment ..... , j.1. this appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 17th may, 2004 passed by the trial court convicting the appellant under section 4(b) and section 5 of the explosive substance act, 1908 and sentencing the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of rs.15,000/- each on the two counts.2 .....

Sh. Deep Chand Vs. Sh. Kulanand Lakhera and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT765; 2007(95)DRJ683

..... , juridical possession, settled possession akin to juridical possession and rank trespass, the provision of law i.e. section 6 of the specific relief act 1963 has rendered nugatory the object of the section, more so in view of the docket explosion in the courts in india. in para 10 of the decision in r.v.bhupal prasad's case ( ..... 1958, the law commission under the chairmanship of late m.c. setalvad in the 9th report of the law commission, dealing with the specific relief act 1877 recommended deletion of section 9. the report records that it was felt that the question of possession cannot be determined without going into the question of title to some extent. ..... to retain possession has expired? 24. a peep into the legal precedents show a fairly hazy picture. 25. the fore runner of section 6 of the specific relief act 1963 was section 9 of the specific relief act 1877. it was the subject matter of discussion in various decisions.26. in the report published as : (1911)13bomlr1200 hillava subbava .....