Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 311 results (0.019 seconds)

Jan 18 2005 (HC)

Holu Ram Nishad and anr. Vs. Ishak Mohmmed and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT1(CG)

..... in substitution for the civil court for adjudicating upon claims for compensation arising out of the 'use of motor vehicles'. this is further made clear from section 110f of the act which states that no civil court shall entertain any question 'relating to any claims for compensation which may be adjudicated upon by the claims tribunal'. in ..... motor vehicle the tanker had fallen on one of its sides on sloping ground resulting in escape of highly inflammable petrol and that there was grave risk of explosion and fire from the petrol coming out of the tanker. in the light of the aforesaid circumstances, the learned judges of the high court have rightly concluded ..... the field of protection made available to the victims of an accident and is in consonance with the beneficial object underlying the enactment.36. was the accident involving explosion and fire in the petrol tanker connected with the use of tanker as a motor vehicle in our view, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2011 (HC)

Matoshri Developers and Another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... constitute the offence alleged. (see r.p. kapur v. state of punjab and rupan deol bajaj v. kanwar pal singh gill)."19. in v.p. shrivastava v. indian explosives limited and others, the supreme court observed as under:"18. in g. sagar suri v. state of u.p. this court had opined as follows: (scc p. 643, ..... the petitioners is without jurisdiction and, as such, the same is illegal.6. shri tamaskar would further submit that as per the provisions of section 235 of the companies act, 1956 (for short "the act, 1956") the central government, where a report is made by registrar of companies, may appoint one or more persons as inspectors to investigate into ..... affairs of the company, under the provisions of section 237 of the act, 1956 and also other cases under the circumstances and, as such, the criminal cases registered against the petitioner society and royal vision is illegal. the notice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2011 (HC)

Commissioner Customs and Central Excise Vs. Lafarge India Private Limi ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... )satish k. agnihotri, j.1. the present appeal filed under section 35-g(2) of the central excise act,1944 arises from the order dated 28.11.2003 (annexure a/1) passed by the northern bench of customs, excise and service tax appellate tribunal (for short `cestat') whereby the ..... the credit is allowed on the inputs which are used within the factory of production.3. the facts, in brief, are that the respondent admittedly used ammonium nitrate and other explosive materials outside the factory mines for production of lime stone which was used in the factory of the respondent for production of cement. the respondent claimed modvat credit on the ..... , in jaypee rewa cement v. commissioner of central excise, m.p.3 held as under:"9. the question which, however arises for consideration is whether it is necessary for the explosive to be used within the factory premises where the manufacture of cement takes places.10. reading of rule 57a clearly shows that the notification is to specify the goods used .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2011 (HC)

Asit Kumar Sen Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... does any act with intent to threaten or likely to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india or with intent to strike terror or likely to strike terror in the people or any section of the people in india or in any foreign country,- (a) by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or ..... of india, any state government or the government of a foreign country or any other person to do or abstain from doing any act, commits a terrorist act. explanation.- for the purpose of this section, public functionary means the constitutional authorities and any other functionary notified in the official gazette by the central government as a public functionary ..... ." 51. on a reading of the above quoted provisions, it would appear that to prove the charges under sections 18 and 39 (2) of the act of 1967, the prosecution is required to prove that the accused has conspired or attempted to commit or advocates, abets, advises or incites, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2014 (TRI)

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Manager ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... one cylinder to another cylinder or from one container to another container unless authorized by the chief controller of explosives. the distributor has no such right in view of the specific provision added to the sub-section which is confined to removal of the seal in presence of the consumer either for checking or installing of ..... concerned, that may be governed by the agreement but it would not take away the right of the consumer by necessary implications. if the distributor is acting under authority of the government's oil company then the government oil company would not be able to absolve itself from the liability to pay compensation in ..... supplied 39. notwithstanding clause 17, if under authority of the government oil company like bharat petroleum corporation ltd. any distributor is authorized, the distributor would be acting only under authority of the company and not independently. the observation in latter part of para 14 of the judgment in indian oil corporation's case referred to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2001 (HC)

Timan Lal Sahu Vs. Shivcharan Lal Sahu

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT64(CG)

..... the appellant or the applicant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period.section 5 of the limitation act provides that the provisions would be applicable to any appeal or any application other than an application under any of the provisions of order 21 ..... order 9, rule 13, cpc seeking the relief of setting aside of the ex parte judgment and decree. along with the said application an application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 was also filed. in the said applications it was inter alia pleaded that the applicant was informed by his counsel that the suit stood dismissed ..... he submits that as the two different situations have been envisaged under article 123 itself there is no scope for application of section 5 of the indian limitation act because if section 5 of the indian limitation act is held applicable to an application/proceedings under order 9, rule 13, cpc then the purpose of article 123 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2001 (HC)

Sheoprasad Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT93(CG)

..... magistrate, bilaspur.2. from the records of the trial court, it appears that crime no. 12/2000 was registered against the applicant-accused for offences punishable under section 41(1)(d) cr.pc/379, ipc. the superintendent of police, bilaspur received an anonymous inland letter wherein it was mentioned by some public spirited (?) person ..... are the custodians of law and order should havethe greatest respect for the personal liberty of citizens and shouldnot flout the laws by stooping to such bizarre acts of lawlessness.custodians of law and order should not become depredators of civilliberties. their duty is to protect and not to abduct.'in the said matter, the ..... ,000/- be immediately returned back to the accused. the accused is given liberty to prosecute dhruv kumar sharma and sue him for recovering damages because for his acts he had to remain in confinement.27. personal liberty of a citizen is of the paramount consideration. the constitution of india respects the personal liberty of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2001 (HC)

Ram Bai Vs. State of M.P. (Chhattisgarh)

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT117(CG)

..... slight doubt about the mental soundness of either of the dying declarations it wouldbe unsafe to base a conviction on such statement albeit its inadmissibility under section 32 of the evidence act. to contend that the dying declaration should be recorded without any loss of time as any remissness may result in shielding of truth, he placed ..... same cannot be relied upon. before appreciating the arguments on this aspect, it would be necessary to refer to the provisions of section 32 of indian evidence act. the material portion of section 32 of lndian evidence act reads as under.-'32. cases in which statement or relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc. is ..... being aggrieved by the judgment dated 18-7-2000 passed in sessions trial no. 412 of 1998 by the learned sessions judge, raipur convicting the appellant under section 302 of the indian penal code and sentencing her to undergo imprisonment for life has filed this appeal.2. the prosecution case in brief is that appellant ram .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2001 (HC)

Bhupendra Singh Babara and Another Vs. Municipal Council Ambikapur and ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2001(3)MPHT80(CG)

..... the court, by two or more persons, even though no special damage has been caused to such persons by reason of such public nuisance or other wrongful act.(2) nothing in this section shall be deemed to limit or otherwiseaffect any right of suit which may exist independently of itsprovisions.'7. order 1, rule 8 of the code of civil ..... or more persons, even though no special damage has been caused to such persons by reason of such public nuisance or other wrongful act. unless the leave is granted by the court a suit instituted under section 91 of the cpc cannot be treated to be a properly instituted suit. a court before granting leave in case of public nuisance ..... and in absence of the leave by the court the suit could not be proceeded on merits.6. section 91 of the code of civil procedure provides as under :--'section 91. public nuisances.-- (1) in the case of a public nuisance or other wrongful act affecting, or likely to affect, the public, a suit for a declaration and injunction or for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2001 (HC)

Gurumukh Singh Hora Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT79(CG)

..... after appreciating the rival contentions came to the conclusion that the said clause 3 (2) of the ordinance was not ultra vires. 10. section 61 of the m.p. reorganisation act, 2000 reads as under: '61. functioning of organisation, registered society or trust incorporated on behest of state government.-- (1) notwithstanding anything ..... or nomination by the registrar or the state government in accordance with the provisions of the madhya pradesh, co-operative societies act, 1960 and the rules made thereunder.' according to section 3 of the ordinance, the existing societies should be reconstituted by excluding from their area of operations the territories comprised in ..... or election or nomination by the registrar or the state government inaccordance with the provisions of the madhya pradesh co-operative societies act, 1960 and the rules made thereunder. sub-section (3) simply provides for filling of the vacancies but it does not say that unless the vacancies are filled, the corresponding .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //