Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 15 of about 205 results (0.043 seconds)

Mar 05 2012 (TRI)

A.C. Aggarwal Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Government of India ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... refer to the rule position. all india service (leave travel concession) rules, 1975 is applicable to a member of the service as defined in section 2 of the all india service act, 1951 and the said section provides that ias, ips are two principal services which come within the ambit of definition for all india service. as per the all india ..... visiting home town and any place in india for the state government pensioners. it is his argument that there are no rules and regulations framed under the all india service act, 1951, to grant ltc for the pensioners of the all india services as has been admissible to the pensioners of the haryana government pensioners. citing the provisions of ..... service of persons appointed to an all india service for which there is no provision in the rules made or deemed to have been made under the all india service act of 1951. it is further indicated in rule 2 (b) that in case of persons serving in connection with the affairs of a state by the rules, regulations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2012 (TRI)

Deepak Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... in timor-leste (un mission in short) for the post of fs4. vide his note dated 20.07.2007 (annexure-p2 colly), he informed the mea administration section that he had to convey his acceptance within seven days from the date of issue of the offer of appointment. on 13.8.2007, in continuation of his ..... shri gangwani would submit that vigilance clearance for his request to the un mission was not granted for the above reason. further, there were investigations for four more acts of misconduct which were underway and a formal departmental proceeding was being contemplated to enquire into those misconducts. in view of the above facts of the investigation going ..... any reasonable reply and he was conveyed vide a communication dated 19.10.2009 (page 40) in response to an appeal filed by him under right to information act, 2005 permitting him to peruse the relevant files and take the photocopies from the respective files. feeling aggrieved by the unfavourable decision of the respondents, the applicant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Ramanuj Upadhyay Vs. Commissioner of Police and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... order which is under challenge in the present original application filed by him under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. 2. it is not in dispute that the applicant had revealed his involvement in the relevant columns of the application and attestation forms. ..... involvement in a criminal case fir no.139/2003 u/s 147/148/332/333/341/308 ipc read with section 7 of criminal law andamendment act and sections 2/3/4 of prevention of damage to public property act, pertaining to ps mutthiganj, district allahabad, in which he was acquitted on 21.04.2010. it is this ..... in a violent agitation/rioting, damaging public property, assaulting, causing simple/grievous injuries to public servant as well as press reporters and doing an act amounting to attempted culpable homicide. such act is highly undesirable. his mob mentality and indulging in violent activities without fear of law and land renders him unsuitable for appointment in delhi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Rajiv Tandon Vs. the Government of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... law are not governed by this principle (emphasis supplied). 21. it is appropriate to notice the provision regarding limitation under s. 21 of the administrative tribunals act. sub-section (1) has prescribed a period of one year for making of the application and power of condonation of delay of a total period of six months has ..... adverted to above would manifest that when it be a case of ordinary representations, the limitation talked of and terminus a quo therefor as provided under section 21 of the act of 1985 would not be attracted, as otherwise, there would be no question of treating an application within limitation when such ordinary representation has been rejected ..... representation or appeal provided to him under the relevant service rules. 6. if the representation is non-statutory, the period of limitation as prescribed under section 21 of the act of 1985, and terminus a quo therefor would not be attracted. we would have further delved into the matter, but we find that the issue .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Man Singh Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through Commissioner of Polic ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... appear to be pari materia. there is, however, substantial difference between the two. there is no sub-section (2) in the act of 1958, like sub-section (2) of section 19 of act of 2000. sub-section (2) of section 19 of the act of 2000 provides that record of conviction of a delinquent has to be removed after expiry of period ..... a criminal case. as mentioned above, there was no discussion in this case with regard to the effect of provisions as contained in section 12 of the act of 1958 or section 19 of the act of 2000. in harichand vs. director of school education (supra), it was indeed a case where, harichand was removed from service on ..... in conflict with law, and another for juvenile in need of care and protection. in the background of objects and reasons of act of 2000, relevant provisions of the act need to be examined. section 19 of act of 2000, pertaining to removal of disqualification attaching to conviction, reads as follows: (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Lalit Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Police and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... , haryana, in which he had been acquitted on 19.02.2007. it is this order which is under challenge in the present original application filed by him under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. 2. it is not in dispute that the applicant had revealed his involvement in the relevant columns of the application and attestation forms. his selection was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

B.R. Dhameja Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... applicant herein, who superannuated on 31.12.2007 as under secretary from the ministry of rural development, the second respondent herein, has filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking a direction to be issued to the respondents to grant him notional fixation of pay to the next higher post of deputy secretary with effect from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Manjeet Vs. Commissioner of Police and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... vide order dated 11.05.2011 his candidature has been cancelled. it is this order which has been challenged by him in the present original application filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. 2. the impugned order refers to the basic facts of the case, and the inputs on which the candidature of the applicant was to be examined ..... the impugned order that it is a fact that the applicant was involved in a criminal case of rioting and assaulted the bus driver and conductor in a pre-planned act, which caused huge damage to the government property, and that due to fear of reprisals, it appeared that even the material witnesses resiled from their earlier statements, and the court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Joginder Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... of the applicant, who was desirous of being a constable (exe.) in delhi police during the recruitment held in the year 2009, has filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, calling in question order dated 11.05.2011, vide which his candidature has been cancelled. 2. the candidature of the applicant has been cancelled only because ..... of injuries, as it appears that even the doctor who might have examined the injuries had not been produced. the applicant was tried u/s 323/325/506 read with section 149 ipc, which would clearly show that the injuries were simple, or grievous by blunt weapon. who out of the accused caused injuries is not known even from the version .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (TRI)

Brahma Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Police and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... post successfully, has since been cancelled vide order dated 16.06.2011. it is this order which has been challenged by him in this original application filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. 2. the applicant applied for his appointment/recruitment on the post of sub inspector (exe.) male in delhi police in phase-ii-2009 under obc category ..... consideration. 5. we may, at this stage, mention that if in petty matters where the nature of offence may be the minimum of all the provisions in ipc, such as section 323, which may be the minimum offence as regards causing bodily injuries, a person has to be deprived of public employment for life, then it is not known in what .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //