Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : May-24-1985
Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)227
..... the draft by the bank at jodhpur on payment of money by the plaintiff did not vest jurisdiction to jodhpur court to entertain the suit. according to mr. bhandari section 20 cpc clearly provides that suits can be instituted where defendant, resides or cause of action arises and therefore, the order of the learned munsif based on sound reasonings ..... suit. defendant nos. 2, 4 and 5 did not file the written statement and were proceeded exparte. defendant no. 1 (present petitioner no. 1) filed an application under section 20 cpc (here in after to be referred as 'the code') on february 25, 1982 and raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the suit in jodhpur court ..... of 'k' praying for a joint and several decree for the recovery of total sum of draft with interest at madras as both branches of the bank had acted negligently and against the instructions of the firm. an objection was raised that the court at madras had no jurisdiction to try the suit as the entire cause of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-06-1985
Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)304
panna chand jain, j.1. this appeal has been filed under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act against the judgment and award dated april 22, 1982, passed by the motor accident claims tribunal in case no. 104/72, by which an award for payment of compensation amounting .....
Tag this Judgment!