Array
(
    [0] =>  ..... is concerned with the offence.6. the above requirements leave no manner of doubt that before the magistrate can invoke the powers vested in him under section 20-a of the act there should be acceptable evidence on record before him that the person proceeded against is also concerned with the offence. the satisfaction to be recorded by .....  was given to the complainant who stated that he has no objection to the summoning of the manufacturer/distributor/dealer in terms of the requirement of section 20-a of the act. thereafter, the petitioner-accused was allowed to examine gurmeet singh as aw-1 and himself as aw-2. gurmeet singh admitted that he is the ..... drawn from him. thus, the statements of the above witnesses examined clearly indicate that the above evidence leaves no manner of doubt that requirement of sections 19 or 20-a of the act as such had not been established by the petitioner-accused. taking notice of these circumstances, the chief judicial magistrate was fully justified in rejecting  ..... 
    [1] => jasbir singh, j.1. petitioner, landlady filed an application before the rent controller for determination of fair rent under section 4 of haryana urban (control of rent and eviction) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the act). it was the case of the petitioner that respondent was a statutory tenant in respect of one shop at the monthly rent of rs. 55/-. it was ..... 
    [2] =>  ..... payment of interest and costs does not arise. secondly, the liability to pay interest on the delayed payment of rent arises under the proviso to section 13(2)(i) of the rent act, only if the tenant has not paid or tendered the rent due in respect of building within 15 days after the expiry of time fixed in ..... subsequent execution of the orders made by the original and the appellate authorities thereunder. it is well settled that beyond the circumscribed limits of sections 16 and 17 of the act in which the relevant sections of the code of civil procedure may be attracted, the rent controller is not bound by any intricate shackles and is wholly free to .....  and ors., (1981)83 p.l.r. 440 has held as under: 'the civil procedure code as such does not govern the proceedings under the act, except to the limited extent provided for under sections 16 and 17 thereof. even by applying these provisions most liberally one cannot bring in either expressly or by necessary implication the rest of the  ..... 
    [3] =>  ..... , (1982)2 supreme court cases 499.in jonsons rubber industries case (supra), the hon'ble high court has held as under:-'arbitration act, 1940 - section 34 - arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 - section 8(2) - recovery suit based on agreement - agreement containing arbitration clause for dispute to be referred to arbitration and also for jurisdiction ..... to be allowed.'23. in food corporation of india'a case (supra), the hon'ble supreme court has made the following observations:-'arbitration act, 1940 (10 of 1940) - section 34 - what constitute steps in the proceedings which if taken before making stay application would disentitled a party to the arbitration agreement to .....  present petitioners, after three months and six days, filed an appeal, against the aforesaid order of the clb, before this court under section 10f of the companies act, 1956. during the pendency of the aforesaid appeal, the petitioners while asserting that there existed an arbitration agreement and they were wanting the ..... 
    [4] =>  .....  1 marla is charand of the village and the same falls within the definition of shamlat deh' as defined in section 2(g) of the act, hence the same vests in the gram panchayat under section 4 of the act. he further pleaded that the aforesaid land in question was earmarked as charand in the consolidation of holdings which took ..... .2. mehar singh petitioner, who is resident of village nabh, tehsil jagadhri, district ambala, filed a suit for declaration under section 13-a of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the act), as applicable to haryana, against respondents no. l to 82 to the effect that the land in question measuring 4/6  .....  this land has been specifically recorded as charand. he further submitted that as per section 2(g)(l) of the act, the lands described in the revenue records as charand will be shamlat deh which vest in the gram panchayat under section 4 of the act. while referring to the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in shish ram  ..... 
    [5] =>  .....  aforesaid factual position and the availability of the documents on record, respondent no. 2 has rightly dismissed the application filed by respondent no. 3 under section 11 of the act while holding that once respondent no. 3 took the land in question on lease from the petitioner, he cannot challenge the ownership of the petitioner. .....  the disputed land on lease from the gram panchayat, therefore, he is not entitled to challenge its ownership and the application filed by him under section 11 of the act for declaring him owner was not maintainable.4. respondent no. 2 vide his order dated 01.10.1996 (annexure p-1) dismissed the aforesaid  ..... ), vide which the appeal filed by respondent no. 3 against the order of dismissal of application filed by him under section 11 of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') was allowed and the order of the divisional deputy director, rural development and panchayats, patiala (exercising the powers of  ..... 
    [6] =>  .....  the impugned order, he submitted that additional director, consolidation was competent and was having jurisdiction to order re-partition of the land in question under section 42 of the act. therefore, there is no illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order passed by respondent no. 2 and the writ petition filed by the petitioner ..... -partition of the musterka malkan land reserved for common purposes of the village in the consolidation being a bachat land amongst the right holders under section 42 of the act. he submitted that before ordering the re-partition of such land, it has to be determined whether such land, which was reserved in consolidation ..... khataunis in column no. 9 of the above said jamabandi. when the contesting respondents no. 4 to 15 filed the petition qua this land under section 42 of the act before the additional director, consolidations, the same was not contested by the gram panchayat. the then sarpanch stated before the additional director, consolidations that  ..... 
    [7] =>  ..... time or casual basis to do manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical or supervisory work in an industry would fall within the definition of workman under section 2(s) of the act.9. in view of the above analysis of the definition of the workman, we hold that every person employed in an industry to do manual, unskilled,  .....  terminated without giving him notice or pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation and this was violative of section 25f of the act. accordingly, he ordered reinstatement of the workman with continuity of service and full back wages from the date of demand notice.6. the only ground on  ..... objection raised on behalf of the employer to the maintainability of the reference and held that a part-time employee falls within the definition of workman under section 2(s) of the act. he further held that the workman had continuously worked as part- time sweeper from june 25, 1982 to october 1, 1997 and his service was ..... 
    [8] =>  ..... . this argument is devoid of any reason. members of gram panchayat, panchayat samiti and zila parishad are covered by definition of panchayat as contained in section 2(zj) of 1994 act. section 208 talks of disqualification qua members of panchayat not of gram panchayat, as such, if any member of panchayat samiti incurs any of the disqualification,  .....  is limited with the government, as compared to the powers available for suspension and removal of sarpanches and panches under section 20 of 1994 act. 16. a perusal of provisions of section 113 and section 2308 of 1994 act, clearly indicates that mere pendency of an fir against a member of panchayat samiti, cannot be made a ground for .....  the effect that in case of registration of a criminal case, a member of panchayat samiti can be removed/suspended from the office. sub-section (1) of section 113 of 1994 act lays down that state government may, during the course of an inquiry suspend a member of a panchayat samiti for any of the reasons for ..... 
    [9] =>  ..... of civil writ petition 4580 of 2002 and other 29 connected writ petitions in which common questions of law arid fact arise.2. section 69 of the haryana municipal act, 1973 (for short the principal act) prescribes for levy of tax payable by the owner of buildings and lands at a certain percentage of the annual value of  .....  value of the land subject of course, to a reasonable depreciation as allowed by the state government. proviso (ii) to clause (c) of section 2(1) as introduced by the amending act, authorises the government to issue directions determining the basis of the assessing the present market value of the land, the cost of erecting the building .....  enables the government to issue directions to any committee for carrying out the purposes of that act. exercising its powers under provision (ii) to section 2(1) (c) read with section 250 of the principal act, the state government has issued directions regarding the amendments of house tax and tax on land (copies of which are annexures p-1 ..... 
)