Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-12-1973
Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR413
..... the acquittal of the accused for they are seriously prejudiced in such matters in getting the sample analysed from the director of central food laboratory under sub-section (2) of section 13 of the act.9. however, the controversy as to the point of time when the accused must of necessity exercise his right has been raised in the present appeal ..... to be a certificate signed by the director of the central food laboratory, may be used as evidence of the facts stated therein in any proceeding under this act or under sections 272 to 276 of the indian penal code:provided that any document purporting to be a certificate signed by the director of the central food laboratory shall be ..... cause the analysis to be made from the authority mentioned of the sample or the part retained under sub-clause (iii) of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 11 of the act. the right of the accused therefore reaches to both the parts, that is, one part delivered to him and another retained by the food inspector or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-15-1973
Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR659
..... fraud._______________________________________________________________________________________the fact of and the reasons for blacklisting should not be disclosed to the firm.accordingly the directorate general of supplies and disposals cs-4-a section (registration branch), (hereinafter referred to as d.g.s.& d.) new delhi, issued the following confidential circular dated december 18, 1965:the government ..... refused to accept the highest bid made at the auction sale of country liquor shops. the supreme court held that the bihar and orissa excise act (act no. ii of 1915) expressly conferred such power on the government and even apart from that it was open to the government as the owner ..... this apart, the ministry of works, housing and supply (department of supply) is responsible for keeping an upto date list of blacklisted firms and also acts as the coordinating ministry for purpose of reviewing doubtful or marginal cases of blacklisting orders (see clause (7) of the code). further, it is common .....
Tag this Judgment!