Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: delhi Year: 2006 Page 5 of about 411 results (0.101 seconds)

Shri Mahender Kumar Vs. Land Acquisition Collector

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ240

..... statutory provision for payment of compensation for any damage which may be done during completion of such duty imposed upon the officer, under the provisions of section 4 of the act. in regard to deficiency of the amount so offered or tendered, the dispute could be referred to the collector or the chief revenue officer. after ..... made on 1.5.05 which gave right to the petitioners to claim compensation for their acquired land. the respondents themselves had issued notices under section 12(2) of the act calling upon the claimants to receive the compensation payable to them as determined in the award. these notices had required the claimants to be ..... claimants have been determined, the petitioners made two separate applications one for receiving compensation of the adjudicated amount and the other for enhancement of compensation under section 18 of the act. these were submitted by the petitioners on 14.6.05. according to the petitioners, the awarded compensation comes to rs. 58,5,049.53/-. .....

Veerendra Chopra and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT115

..... of mtnl lines and, thereforee, would come within the definition of utilisation of any telegram facility. in my view, prima facie, the charge under section 25 of the indian telegram act, 1885 can be framed and has been rightly framed.6. coming to the third and last submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, it ..... 3. mr malik, who appears on behalf of the state, submitted that section 25 of the act is clearly made out inasmuch as section 25(c) deals with commission of mischief. he submitted that mischief has been defined in section 425 of the ipc and the acts alleged to have been committed by the petitioners would fall within the scope ..... data circuits by bypassing the vsnl gateway. he submitted that the charges have been framed against the petitioners under sections 20, 20-a and 25 read with section 4 of the indian indian telegraph act, 1885 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said act').2. the learned counsel for the petitioners made three submissions. his first submission was that .....

Electrical Manufacturing Company Ltd. Vs. National thermal Power Corpo ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(1)ARBLR449(Delhi); III(2006)BC575; 129(2006)DLT224; 2006(87)DRJ465

..... a similar plea raised about the appointment of third arbitrator is thus rejected.26. learned senior counsel for the respondent sought to contend that sub-section 3 of section 4 of the said act would have no application in view of the fact that the arbitration proceedings were still not pending on 8.1.1993 as the first sitting was ..... not valid. in state of haryana v. chandra mani and ors. : 2002(143)elt249(sc) while dealing with the issue of condensation of delay under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 it was held by the apex court that certain amount of latitude within reasonable limits is permissible having regard to impersonal bureaucratic set-up involving red ..... from retrospective date. this is not so in the present case. not only that there was no analogous provision to sub-section 3 of section 4 of the said act.17. in the present case the said act was introduced inter alias with the object of dealing with the problem of uneven distributed energy sources in the country and multiplicity .....

Nandu and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ314

..... certainly the respondents would be entitled to exclude the period during which the proceedings were stayed by this court as contemplated under proviso to section 6(1) of the act. the remaining period out of the period of one year prescribed under law would be available to respondents for issuance of such notification/declaration ..... depending upon any relevant date available to the state authorities at the time when they issued the impugned notification under section 4(1) of the act and dispensed with section 5-a inquiry by resorting to section 17 sub-section (4) thereof. the first point is, thereforee, answered in the negative, in favor of the appellants and ..... desire from proceeding with the acquisition proceedings after issuance of the notification in january 1988 and hearing the objections of the petitioners as required under section 5a of the act. these are the decisions to be made by the respondents. the court is of the view that the entire acquisition proceedings are not vitiated .....

P.C. Khanna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ684

..... above narration of factual matrix of the case it is clear that the land stands acquired vide notification dated 10.5.06 issued under section 4 of the act. the provisions of section 31(3) of the act do not give any indefeasible legal right to any person to claim land in lieu of compensation payable for acquisition of his land. ..... lease hold, a tenant or permissive use for a specified purpose. these are merely illustrative examples and the expression cannot be explained exhaustively in a judgment. section 31(4) of the act vests vide powers in the collector to enter into any arrangement with any person interested in the land and competent to contract. wider the power vested, greater ..... to the acquisition of his land. on this premise the petitioner submits that petitioner has a legal right for allotment of land for land in terms of. section 31(3) of the act, particularly when the respondents have already entered into an exchange deed, land for land, in favour of m/s jindal pipes ltd. and had even .....

Shri Ramesh Chandra Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi58

..... argument in this connection which we have to notice was based on sections 126 and 127 of the act. section 126 deals with the preparation by the chief executive officer of the corporation called commissioner, of the annual budget. the budget has to include an estimate of ..... held that when revenue earned out of the impost is substantial, the same would not be justifiable as fee.25. in liberty cinema this court, while interpreting section 548 of the calcutta municipal act providing for grant of a license, observed: air 1116 par 18the reference to the heading of part v can at most indicate that the provisions in it were ..... to the person on whom the levy is imposed, it cannot be a fee wherever it may be placed in the statue. a consideration of where sections 443 and 548 are placed in the act is irrelevant for determining whether the levy imposed by them is a fee or a tax. it was further observed: air 1116 par 1919. the last .....

R.D. Bohet S/O Sh. Bhoop Singh, Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi, Govt. of Nc ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... many of whom are under trials with previous convictions, convicts involved in murder rape and other heinous offences convicts involved in offences under the arms act and explosive act as also the ndps act and further tada and pota under trials, dangerous prisoners like those involved in the attack on parliament on 13th december 2001 and other death sentence ..... though the ccs (cca) rules, 1965 have not taken enough provisions and stringent measures to call for the presence yet under the commission of inquiries act, 1952, section 4 provides as a power of commission to summon and enforce the attendance of any person from any part of india to depose on oath, failing ..... authority has given detailed and cogent reasons for arriving at a decision in this regard. the order is based on violation of the provisions of section 9 of the delhi prisons act, 2000 that provides that the officers (of the jail) shall not have business dealings with the prisoners. the disciplinary authority has clarified that .....

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

..... adjutant air force station, new delhi placing the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the central government under section 161(2) of air force act, 1950; section 65 & 110 of air force act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by general court martial from 10.6.1983 to 21.6.1983 and all ..... feeling of impunity and repeatedly, then there can hardly be any scope left for any court to hold that they are entitled to the benefit of the provisions of section 13 of the act.2. compelled with somewhat similar circumstances, a division bench of this court consisting of dr. mukundakam sharma, j and hima kohli, j, on 8.8.2006 ..... :that in the aforementioned facts & circumstances, the execution of sentence/warrants, if any, is liable to be stayed under section 17(5), 19(3) & 13 read with the proviso to section 12 and sections 13, 9, 8, 6, 5 & 3 of the contempt of courts act, 1971 (as amended in 2006) and with ss. 3, 4 & 12 of the probation of offenders .....

Mohd. Farukh Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(91)DRJ206

..... was carried like hand, shoulder, back or head, etc. therefore, it is not possible to include these articles within the ambit of the word 'person' occurring in section 50 of the act.4. in the latest authority reported in state of haryana v. ranbir singh @ rana 2006 scc 166, the recovery of contraband article from plastic bag carried by accused ..... a hand bag or like and the incriminating article is found therefrom, it would still be a search of the person of the accused requiring compliance with section 50 of the act. however, when an article is lying elsewhere and is not on the person of the accused and is brought to a place where the accused is found ..... colour was recovered from the right hand of the accused which contained the above said contraband. learned counsel for the appellant argued with vehemence that no notice under section 50 of the ndps act was served upon the appellant. in support of his case, he has cited an authority reported in namdi francis nwazor v. union of india 1997 (1) .....

C.L. Khanna and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 136(2007)DLT111; [2007(113)FLR1115]; (2007)2LLJ915Del

..... the central provident fund commissioner.2. the brief facts of the case are that the respondent no. 3 initiated proceedings against the appellant no. 1 under section 7a of the act. section 7a of the act reads as follows:7a. determination of moneys due from employers. - (1) the central provident fund commissioner, any additional provident fund commissioner, any deputy ..... no. 2, m/s. k.f. engineering works and a.pee industries. this was examined in the light of the mandate of section 2a of the act. the sweep of section 2a of the act as extracted above, is wide and covers cases such as the present case. the court is also required to examine the issue of ..... fund commissioner and anr. v. dharamsi morarji chemical co. ltd. : (1998)2scc446 . in the said case, the hon'ble supreme court found that section 2a of the act was not attracted because one unit was making fertilizers and another unit with a separate registration number was manufacturing inorganic chemicals in a separate factory. separate set of .....