Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: delhi Year: 2003 Page 14 of about 294 results (0.467 seconds)

Beco Chemicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC117

..... appellant no. 1 was suppressed by them from the department; that the commissioner has given his findings in the impugned order for invoking the provisions of proviso to section 11a(1) of the act; that penalty is thus imposable on both the appellants.7.1. we have considered the submissions of both the sides. notification no. 175/86-c.e. ( ..... and clearance of product was known to the revenue all the time; that none of the ingredients such as suppression, wilful mis-statement, etc., mentioned in proviso to section 11a(1) of the act exists in the instant case. reliance has been placed on the decision in tata iron & steel co.ltd. v. uoi, 1987 (32) e.l.t. 676 (pat ..... (p) ltd. are bearing the brand name "anand" belonging to m/s. bec fertilisers ltd. and whether both of them are 'related persons' in terms of section 4 of the central excise act.2.1 shri l.p. asthana, learned advocate, submitted that m/s. beco chemicals (p) ltd., appellant no. 1 are a small-scale unit manufacturing plant growth .....

Additional Commissioner of Vs. Hughes Services (Far East) (P.)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)87ITD137(Delhi)

..... .3 of cbdt circular no. 779 dated 14-9-1999 reported as 240 itr page 3 (statute) wherein it has been clarified that the amendment by finance act, 1999 in section 9(1)(ii) would apply to assessment year 2000-01 and subsequent assessment years. the legislature has not said that salary for services rendered in india would include ..... co. ltd. v. cit [1954] 26 itr 27 wherein their lordships observed at page 51 as under: the word 'earned' even though it does not appear in section 4 of the act has been very often used in the course of the judgments by learned judges both in the high courts as well as the supreme court (vide cit v. ahmedbhai ..... within four concerns of the taxing provisions.6. before coming to the contention of ld. dr regarding retrospective operation of explanation substituted by finance act, 1999, let us first consider the scope of section 9(1)(ii) as originally enacted and amended from time to time in the light of judicial interpretation. such provisions as originally enacted read .....

Mohan MeakIn Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... (b)? the following points of difference between the learned members constituting the division bench were referred to me as third member by the hon'ble president acting under section 255(4) of the i.t.act, 1961: - "1. whether on facts and in law, the income-tax appellate tribunal committed an apparent mistake by including the following in the directions ..... (1) in view of the supreme court judgment in the case of allied motors, 224 itr 677 wherein it has been held that proviso to section 43b invoked by finance act, 1987 was retrospective and would apply to earlier years also. proceeding further, it was stated that by inadvertence, the tribunal failed to consider the said judgment ..... pressed before us during the hearing as mentioned above, we hold that there was no mistake apparent from record and there is no case for action under section 254(2) of the act. the assessee by raising these points in the misc. application has in fact tried to obtain review of the order which is not permissible under .....

interads Advertising (P) Ltd. Vs. Palmex Enterprises and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VIAD(Delhi)47; I(2004)BC502; 1(2003)DLT106; 2003(71)DRJ795

..... liability or responsibility for the description, quantity, weight, quality, condition, packing, delivery, value or existence of the goods represented thereby, or for the good faith or acts and/or omissions, solvency, performance or standing of the consignor, the carriers of the insurers of the goods or any other person whomsoever. article 16 a. if ..... 's demand, infraction of its obligations, inviting financial liability, would transpire only if the advice of defendant no. 9 was found to be incorrect. banks act through their officers and are bound to third parties for all consequences even if such officers are negligent or premises in the manner in which they discharge their ..... between defendant no. 9 and itself and if this argument is extended to its logical conclusion, there should be no legal infirmity if defendant no. 3 had acted entirely on the advice of defendant no. 9. as already noted above, no discrepancies exist in the documents and it would, thereforee, make no difference whatsoever .....

Assn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333

..... after the coming into force of the commissioner of police system in delhi in 1978, the commissioner of police was notified as the licensing authority under the act. under section 10 of the act, license to be granted to a cinema hall can be either annual or temporary or casual. all cinemas in delhi are, thereforee, required to get their ..... breaker had been provided to control 1000 kva transformer of delhi vidyut board with the provision of over current and earth fault relays at the initial stage. an explosion vent pipe was provided to release gas pressure. it was submitted that since the relays at various sub-stations all over delhi were getting stolen, it was difficult ..... a view of not disturbing the show, the management of uphaar cinema has failed to take steps to lodge complaints expeditiously. on the one hand when the loud explosion took place, there was instant tripping in 0.3 seconds at the substation at aiims which cut off the electricity supply. on the other hand the management of .....

S.K. Malhotra, S/O Shri S.L. Malhotra Vs. Engineering Projects (India) ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)380; 105(2003)DLT906; 2003(71)DRJ730; 2004(1)SLJ172(Delhi)

..... v/s. karunamoy banerjee : (1967)iillj739sc . mr. venkatramani contended that the effect of admission so recorded by the enquiry officer and relied upon section 31 of the indian evidence act. in support of his contentions he further relied upon edward boykin jr., v/s. state of alabama in which it was held :-'.................'presuming waiver ..... upon sub-rule (ii) of rule 2 and said that dishonesty in connection with company's business or property would also fall in the category of acts and omissions constituting misconduct. lastly, it was contended before me that appellate authority examined all the relevant records and passed appropriate decision and the decision of ..... the article of charges in terms of the definition of misconduct on the petitioner by enlacing its scope, it was contended that conduct rules and particularly rule 2 define acts and omissions constituting misconduct. the respondents had implicated the petitioner under rule 2 sub-rules (2), (4) and (9) and (25). it was contended .....

Shri Rajinder Kumar Vs. Shri Iqbal Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)469; AIR2003Delhi441; 2003(69)DRJ622

..... on 1st of april, 2000, the family settlement (annexure p-1) or disclaimer agreement could not be taken as 'instrument of partition' as contemplated under section 2(15) of the act. the partition decree that was passed in the suit simply took note of an existing fact of partition in pursuance of compromise between the parties and it did ..... in severalty, a final order for effecting a partition passed by any civil court is also covered within the purview of 'instrument of partition' as defined in section 2(15) of the act. in view of the recital in 'family settlement' (annexure p-1) and the disclaimer agreement dated 15th of may, 2000, an oral partition of the properties ..... a bond (no.15) for the amount of the value of the separated share or shares of the property. an 'instrument of partition' is defined under section 2 (15) of the act and it reads thus : 'instrument of partition' means any instrument whereby co-owners of any property divide or agree to divide such property in severalty, and .....

P.V. Mahashabdey Vs. Delhi Development Authority,

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)305; 103(2003)DLT88; 2003(68)DRJ102; 2003(3)SLJ367(Delhi)

..... type of cases. it is seen that the cbi had investigated and recommended that the evidence was not strong enough for successful prosecution of the appellant under section 5(1)(e) of the act. it had, however, recommended to take disciplinary action. no doubt, much time elapsed in taking necessary decision at different levels. so, the delay ..... dda has also requested separately to dcp crime & railways to furnish the records. further date of hearing shall be given only after the receipts of the listed section through the disciplinary cell and the po is not responding to the directions given by this office since he belongs to another department i.e. delhi police and ..... offences allegedly committed by the petitioner.6. on 30th january, 1991, a charge-sheet was issued to the petitioner in which it was alleged that he had committed acts of omission and commission, which displayed gross negligence, lack of devotion to duty, and lack of integrity. the charge-sheet was served upon the petitioner on 5th .....

Dr. Kapil Garg and Sh. Hari Singh Shekhawat Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 4(2003)CCR172; 107(2003)DLT228; 2003(70)DRJ621; 2003(3)JCC1488; 2003RLR111

..... all the hospitals informing about his termination and thereby he would not get job anywhere. 3. this act on their part has been brought by the mm within the mischief of 'extortion' and 'criminal intimidation'. offence under section 386 ipc punishes a person who puts any other person in fear of death or grievous hurt for ..... inducing the person to deliver to him any property or valuable security or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security. offence under section 506 ipc prescribes punishment for 'criminal intimidation'. mischief of 'criminal intimidation' means giving threat with an intention to cause any injury to any person or his ..... the presumptive and conjectural premise that management being in much advantageous and dominant position appears to have forced the respondent to resign and thereby committed offences under sections 386/506/34 ipc.9. i am afraid if such cases are allowed to be registered and taken cognizance, then no employer would be safe and .....

Chhaya Rani Vs. Shardanand and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : I(2004)ACC316; 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)47

..... person the multiplier has to be applied considering the age of the parents and unless there are special reasons, the multiplier mentioned in the second schedule of the motor vehicles act should normally be applied to arrive at loss of dependency to the family, however, the facts and circumstances of the present case and keeping in view the fact that the .....