Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... , the complainant was not entitled to file the complaint under section 12 of the act. but it has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant that he is a consumer in the sense that he has been using the car, ..... the reply. 4. learned counsel for both the parties were heard. 5. under the consumer protection act (herein after referred as the act) a complaint can be filed by a consumer or by any recognised consumer association or the central or state government. section 12 of the act contains necessary provision with regard thereto. under these circumstances, on the basis of the authorisation slip .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna
..... storeyed building in the adjacent plot. the opposite party no. (vii), on complaint from nearby residents, was restrained by the s.d.m., patna under section 144, criminal procedure code on 17.11.1993. the complainant claims that his construction materials were usurped by the opposite party no. (vii) for which he may ..... operative house construction society limited, lohianagar (hereafter society), opposite party no. (vii), in its written statement, has submitted that the complaint petition under consumer protection act, 1986 preliminarily is not maintainable as the complainant is not a consumer in respect of opposite party no. (vii) and therefore opposite party no. (vii ..... objective, responsive and care-taking towards protection of the interests of the consumer in keeping with the legislative intentions of welfare oriented consumer protection act, 1986. it is disturbing to note the lack of sense of administrative accountability in the organisation. the board has stated in its written statement .....
Tag this Judgment!