Explicitness - Judgment Search Results

K. Savanth Vs. the Mysore State Road Transport Corporation and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1133; [1978(36)FLR371]; (1978)ILLJ518SC; (1978)2SCC378; [1978]3SCR398; 1978(10)LC250(SC)

..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....

Banarsi Dass Chadha and Brothers Vs. Lt. Governor, Delhi Administratio ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1587; [1978(37)FLR249]; (1978)4SCC11; [1979]1SCR271; 1978(10)LC744(SC)

..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....

Jalan Trading Co. (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. D.M. Aney and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC233; [1979(38)FLR58]; (1979)ILLJ162SC; (1979)3SCC220

..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....

Bhajan Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1759; 1979CriLJ7; (1978)4SCC77; [1979]1SCR527; 1978(10)LC737(SC)

..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....

Jagdish Chandra (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Brij Mohan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1318; (1978)2SCC361; [1978]2SCR805; 1978(10)LC151(SC)

..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... regard to these additional characteristics we declared as much in the first cases explicitly to recognize racial distinctions as suspect distinctions between citizens solely because of their ..... programs designed to avoid exclusion of historically disadvantaged minorities even when such programs explicitly take race into account finds direct support in our cases construing congressional legislation .....

Monell Vs. Department of Soc. Svcs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decision of the 1871 debates i would have difficulty inferring from 1983 an explicit congressional declaration against municipal liability for the implementation of official policies in violation ..... unconsidered assumptions of jurisdiction simply cannot outweigh four consistent decisions of this court explicitly considering and rejecting that jurisdiction nor is there any indication that any later .....

Hutto Vs. Finney

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of constitutional dimension we should not permit items of legislative history to substitute for explicit statutory language the court should be hesitant to presume general congressional awareness sec v ..... case in fitzpatrick we held that under 5 of the fourteenth amendment congress could explicitly allow for recovery against state agencies without violating the eleventh amendment but in fitzpatrick .....

Adamo Wrecking Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... unexplained exercise of supposed authority finally as noted in n 4 supra congress has not explicitly adopted the administrator s present position with regard to the meaning of the term emission ..... not affect the administrator s power to promulgate work practice rules because the 1977 amendments explicitly recognize that power but congress has not amended 112 c which continues to permit enforcement .....

Tennessee Valley Auth. Vs. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of public funds which would accompany injunctive relief the court nonetheless decided that the act explicitly commanded precisely that result it is conceivable that the welfare of an endangered species ..... 2 1976 ed emphasis added in addition the legislative history undergirding 7 reveals an explicit congressional decision to require agencies to afford first priority to the declared national policy .....