Skip to content


Explain - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explain Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 303 results (0.216 seconds)
1766

STACKHOUSE'S LESSEE Vs. STACKHOUSE

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jutted out to the southward of the meadow fence and he offered parol testimony to explain the meaning of the will for admitting the testimony the following authorities were adduced 2 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1778

Respublica Vs. Carlisle

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states of america with respect to this third species of treason the legislature has further explained the meaning of the words aiding and assisting to be by joining the armies of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1778

Respublica Vs. Malin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... alone do not amount to treason but he insisted that they were proper evidence to explain the defendant s actions on a trial for that crime 1 hawk 39 fost 202 ..... enemy at another time words indicating his intention to join them are proper testimony to explain the motives upon which that intention was afterwards carried into effect the attorney general then .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1781

The Resolution

Court: US Supreme Court

..... voyage to dominica and the taking a cargo there but all these circumstances are easily explained without adopting the idea that the voyage was intended for great britain what is suggested .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1784

Respublica Vs. De Longchamps

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to de longchamps requesting to see him that the defendant readily attended when his excellency explained his reasons for apprehending that he meditated some personal violence upon monsieur marbois and requested .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1784

Talbot Vs. Commanders and Owners of Three Brigs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in qualifying the extent of the original expression we are under the same necessity of explaining the terms of qualification themselves and certainly we have the same right founded on reason ..... and law to explain them that we had to introduce them in doing this we shall find secondly that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1784

Gerard Vs. Basse

Court: US Supreme Court

..... done and to those cases only the adverse authorities are confined 2 bac abr 569 explains the mode of reversing judgments and 2 bac abr 227 is so full upon the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1786

Grier Vs. Grier

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by the replication in the present case were such averment necessary for it is only explaining more particularly what was contained in the award itself upon the whole the court is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1788

Lewis Vs. Maris

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to prove a will the statute of 32 h 8 c i which is merely explained by the 34 and 35 of the same reign enables a man by his will ..... however that neither the statute of henry 8 nor the statutes by which it is explained made any alteration in respect to testaments of goods and chattels and therefore they are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
1788

Penman Vs. Wayne

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to matter of law this rule indeed which applies in all cases of evidence satisfactorily explains why a disjunctive is introduced in the section under consideration why the provision in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT
  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //