Skip to content


Executable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: executable Sorted by: old Year: 1932 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.023 seconds)
Jan 04 1932 (FN)

Marine Transit Corp. Vs. Dreyfus

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... the award with the further provision that if payment was not made within ten days execution should issue against the marine transit corporation and the stipulator a motion to restrain the ..... them for an amount not exceeding the amount named in such stipulation and that thereupon execution may issue against their goods chattels lands and tenements or other real estate footnote 5 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (FN)

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... a statement was submitted to the commission on behalf of the western association of railway executives directing attention to the serious financial condition of the carriers a further petition for rehearing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (FN)

Matson Navigation Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... s 354 act of june 15 1917 c 29 40 stat 182 183 and an executive order promulgated by the president on july 11 1917 requisitioned for use by the united .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (FN)

United States Ex Rel. Polymeris Vs. Trudell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... syllabus 1 under the immigration act of may 26 1924 13 a b and the executive regulations pursuant thereto an alien who was lawfully domiciled in this country but who went .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (PC)

Akhoy Kumar Kar Vs. Krishna Chandra Saha

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

Reported in: AIR1932Cal569

..... and to certain other matters relating to the formalities connected with the starting of the execution proceedings on 2th april 1931 these objections were dismissed for default of appearance on the ..... to circumstances over which he had no control his previous conduct in connexion with the execution proceedings however has also got to be taken into consideration upon a consideration therefore of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (PC)

Satish Chandra Banerjee Vs. Munilal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

Reported in: AIR1932Cal821

..... invariably are and on 11th january 1929 the order having been transmitted to calcutta for execution the present plaintiff s calcutta shop with the articles therein was attached the present plaintiff ..... to a case where the court had no jurisdiction at all or the writ was executed against a wrong person or against property that was not included in the writ they .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (FN)

Arizona Grocery Co. Vs. Atchison, T. and S.F. Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

arizona grocery co v atchison t s f ry co 284 u s 370 1932 u s supreme court arizona...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (FN)

First National Bank of Boston Vs. Maine

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... the united states and promissory notes all physically within that state some of the notes executed by residents of missouri were secured on lands in that state applying the principles of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1932 (PC)

Mt. Ram Kunwar Vs. Amar Nath and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-05-1932

Reported in: AIR1932All361

..... was the owner of that property and that it was not attachable or saleable in execution of a decree no 140 of 1924 held by defendant 1 against defendant 2 bishambhar ..... recorded for bishambhar singh subsequently to this on 8th september 1915 there was a lease executed by the plaintiff and defendant 2 of their half share in certain property which had .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1932 (PC)

M.V.K. Venkataraman and ors. Vs. S. Sivagurunatha Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-05-1932

Reported in: AIR1933Mad639

..... force to krishnier merely because he does not happen to be an execution purchaser but a pledgee whose money was used for averting the ..... the evidence relating to them the promissory note ex 2 was executed jointly by both sivagnana and manikavachaga and the evidence of d ..... originated in a desire to save these jewels from sale in execution by re pledging them and there is evidence that funds ware .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //