Exceptions - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: exceptions Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 2,708 results (0.049 seconds)Georgia Vs. South Carolina
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1990
..... special master has submitted two reports making several boundary recommendations both states have filed exceptions held 1 the special master s determination that the barnwell islands are in south ..... carolina is adopted georgia s exception is overruled south carolina has established sovereignty over the islands by prescription and acquiescence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKansas Vs. Utilicorp United
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-21-1990
..... simplicity and certainty that could justify a cost plus contract exception see illinois brick supra 431 u s at 742 p areeda ..... u s 226 reason rather than extending the illinois brick exception to 4 s grant of a cause of action to persons ..... their individual recoveries for these reasons we remain unconvinced that the exception sought by the petitioners would promote antitrust enforcement better than .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHodgson Vs. Minnesota
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1990
..... probable education employment skills financial resources and emotional maturity unwanted motherhood may be exceptionally burdensome for a minor in addition the fact of having a child ..... probable education employment skills financial resources and emotional maturity unwanted motherhood may be exceptionally burdensome for a minor clearly then requiring notification of one parent significantly burdens .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTidaho Vs. Wright
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-1990
..... noted that the child s statements did not fall within a traditional hearsay exception and lacked particularized guarantees of trustworthiness because the doctor had conducted the interview ..... in our assessment of their reliability for constitutional purposes citation omitted the residual hearsay exception by contrast accommodates ad hoc instances in which statements not otherwise falling within .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPennsylvania Vs. Muniz
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-18-1990
..... seven questions are nonetheless admissible because the questions fall within a routine booking question exception which exempts from miranda s coverage questions to secure the biographical data necessary ..... and therefore were not words or actions constituting custodial interrogation with two narrow exceptions not relevant here footnote 17 the dialogue also contained limited and carefully worded .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSawyer Vs. Smith
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-21-1990
..... the conviction on federal habeas corpus unless the rule falls within one of two narrow exceptions the fifth circuit requested supplemental briefing from the parties on the question whether teague ..... procedural defaults against a particular defendant is premised on the dual notion that absent exceptional circumstances a defendant is bound by the tactical decisions of competent counsel and that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJames Vs. Illinois
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1990
..... frustrate rather than further the purposes underlying the exclusionary rule the previously recognized exception penalizes defendants for committing perjury by allowing the prosecution to expose their perjury ..... respect to defendants testimony because even the more limited expansion of the impeachment exception would palpably inhibit defendants presentation of a defense finally the dissent embraces the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPennsylvania Dpw Vs. Davenport
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-1990
..... faithful to the language and structure of the code congress defined debt broadly and carefully excepted particular debts from discharge where policy considerations so warranted in thus securing a broader ..... reasons that if restitution obligations were not debts there would be no need to except them from discharge therefore it says congress clearly intended that criminal restitution orders be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaffle Vs. Parks
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-05-1990
..... in cases on collateral review unless the rule comes within one of two narrow exceptions this limitation on the proper exercise of habeas corpus jurisdiction applies to capital and noncapital ..... today a majority of the court adopts this crabbed construction of the second exception and holds that the exception is limited to watershed rules of criminal procedure implicating the fundamental fairness .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaislIn Indus. Vs. Primary Steel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-21-1990
..... which amendments have the practical effect of making more carriers eligible for the preexisting exception to the filing requirement of 10761 a permitting the commission to exempt them under ..... were unreasonable footnote 2 2 amendments to the act incorporated language that expressly allows exceptions in cases in which the commission determines that strict enforcement would be unreasonable footnote .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial